You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@tez.apache.org by "Siddharth Seth (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/10/24 19:53:34 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (TEZ-1638) Missing type parametrization in runtime Input/Output configs

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Siddharth Seth updated TEZ-1638:
--------------------------------
    Summary: Missing type parametrization in runtime Input/Output configs  (was: Missing type parametrization in UnorderedKVInputConfig? )

> Missing type parametrization in runtime Input/Output configs
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TEZ-1638
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TEZ-1638
>             Project: Apache Tez
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Kostas Tzoumas
>            Assignee: Kostas Tzoumas
>            Priority: Critical
>             Fix For: 0.5.2
>
>         Attachments: tez1638.patch, tez1638.patch
>
>
> In UnorderedInputConfig (https://github.com/apache/tez/blob/master/tez-runtime-library/src/main/java/org/apache/tez/runtime/library/conf/UnorderedKVInputConfig.java) some methods of SpecificBuilder have a parameterized return type (SpecificBuilder<E>) and some a non-parameterized return type (SpecificBuilder).
> Shouldn't all methods return the parameterized version? 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)