You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@commons.apache.org by Ronald Hinchley <co...@gmail.com> on 2012/05/23 08:01:33 UTC
[scxml]
I notice that none of the examples or cases work. W3C Working Draft 16
February 2012. SCXML seems heavenly to me but is there interest in it?
Re: [scxml]
Posted by Rahul Akolkar <ra...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Ronald Hinchley <co...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I notice that none of the examples or cases work. W3C Working Draft 16
> February 2012. SCXML seems heavenly to me but is there interest in it?
<snip/>
I believe you're asking about the Commons SCXML project, rather than
the W3C SCXML standard itself. See this recent thread:
http://markmail.org/message/wu5rfl25fxjyn7tb
-Rahul
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@commons.apache.org