You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xmlbeans.apache.org by "Johannes Stamminger (JIRA)" <xm...@xml.apache.org> on 2006/08/14 16:30:16 UTC

[jira] Commented: (XMLBEANS-175) Validation of decimal in exponential representation fails

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-175?page=comments#action_12427901 ] 
            
Johannes Stamminger commented on XMLBEANS-175:
----------------------------------------------

I just tried to switch to XmlDecimal ... but it fails the same way as when using the reported mechanism:

        final XmlDecimal decimal = XmlDecimal.Factory.newInstance();
        decimal.setBigDecimalValue(new BigDecimal("4.0E+7"));
        assertFalse(decimal.xmlText().contains("E"));

 fails, the "4.0E+7" stays unchanged.

But the following works, event with the 1E-8 reported not doing so in my first workaround:

        decimal.setStringValue(new BigDecimal("4.0E+7").toPlainString());
        assertFalse(decimal.xmlText().contains("E"));
        decimal.setStringValue(new BigDecimal("1E-8").toPlainString());
        assertFalse(decimal.xmlText().contains("E"));


> Validation of decimal in exponential representation fails
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: XMLBEANS-175
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/XMLBEANS-175
>             Project: XMLBeans
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Validator
>    Affects Versions: Version 2
>            Reporter: Johannes Stamminger
>         Assigned To: Radu Preotiuc-Pietro
>         Attachments: TestExponent.jar, TestExponent.xsd, XMLBeansExponentTest.java
>
>
> Having an attribute of type xsd:decimal. Validating a document having set the attribute to "4.2E1" fails with error message "unexpected char '69'" (char '69' is the E). Value "42" works fine.
> Other XML parsers validate "4.2E1" successfully.
> Parsing fails in org.apache.xmlbeans.impl.values.JavaDecimalHolder#validateLexical(String, ValidationContext).
> BTW: according to my XML documentation, type xsd:decimal is "same as java.math.BigDecimal".
> If this info is correct: IMHO it would be better to rely the BigDecimal-parsing capability ... ?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xmlbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xmlbeans.apache.org