You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@vxquery.apache.org by Vinayak Borkar <vi...@gmail.com> on 2013/10/07 09:33:00 UTC
Re: Binary artifacts
We do have 3 binding votes so far from:
Jochen Wiedmann
Cezar Andrei
Vinayak Borkar
I think we should be able to move to the next step of getting the IPMC
votes.
Vinayak
On 10/7/13 12:23 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
> Very well, so we can at least feed the maven repositories.I'd personally
> still be in favour for a classical binary distribution (if for no other
> reason than to discuss the format: zip, tar.gz, 7z, ....., but we can do
> that on the source archive, if anyone desires.), but getetting out the
> first release is top priority. So, let's go on.
>
> I didn't count. Do we have the 3 binding votes?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jochen,
>>
>> as I tried to say in my first sentence, binary artifacts are available.
>> However, as we have 3 subprojects that each produce a jar, they are in a
>> different directory in the repository.
>> E.g. for vxquery-core they are in
>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery-core/0.2-incubating/
>> In this directory we have the binary jar (and the source and javadoc jars)
>> and it contains a LICENSE and NOTICE in the META-INF folder.
>>
>> Till
>>
>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project
>> that
>>> doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are publishing
>>> binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards like
>>> containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
>>> could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
>>> release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not
>> your
>>> question, I assume?
>>>
>>> So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for
>> the
>>> users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them as
>>> an important part of the release.
>>>
>>> Jochen
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>>
>>>> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available in
>>>> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts
>> and
>>>> that we need to vote on the sources.
>>>>
>>>> Is that right?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Till
>>>>
>>>>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
>>>>>
>>>>> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and perhaps
>>>> not
>>>>> what users expect.)
>>>>>
>>>>> Regardless of the answer, here's my
>>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report is
>>>>>> consistent as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
>>>>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The RAT report is at:
>>>>>>
>>>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release
>> can
>>>>>> currently be found at
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote
>>>>>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>>>>>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>>>> friends
>>>>> with the bully!"
>>>>>
>>>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>> friends
>>> with the bully!"
>>>
>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>
>>
>
>
Re: Binary artifacts
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I'm just reviewing now if you can wait a mo, or I'll just vote on general@.
...ant
On Monday, October 7, 2013, Vinayak Borkar <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We do have 3 binding votes so far from:
>
> Jochen Wiedmann
> Cezar Andrei
> Vinayak Borkar
>
> I think we should be able to move to the next step of getting the IPMC
votes.
>
> Vinayak
>
>
> On 10/7/13 12:23 AM, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>
>> Very well, so we can at least feed the maven repositories.I'd personally
>> still be in favour for a classical binary distribution (if for no other
>> reason than to discuss the format: zip, tar.gz, 7z, ....., but we can do
>> that on the source archive, if anyone desires.), but getetting out the
>> first release is top priority. So, let's go on.
>>
>> I didn't count. Do we have the 3 binding votes?
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>
>>> as I tried to say in my first sentence, binary artifacts are available.
>>> However, as we have 3 subprojects that each produce a jar, they are in a
>>> different directory in the repository.
>>> E.g. for vxquery-core they are in
>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-128/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery-core/0.2-incubating/
>>> In this directory we have the binary jar (and the source and javadoc
jars)
>>> and it contains a LICENSE and NOTICE in the META-INF folder.
>>>
>>> Till
>>>
>>> On Oct 4, 2013, at 3:33 AM, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Source artifacts are essential. However, I am unaware of *any* project
>>>
>>> that
>>>>
>>>> doesn't provide one or more binary artifacts. And, if you are
publishing
>>>> binary artifacts at all, they are also subject to certain standards
like
>>>> containing LICENSE and NOTICE files. I wouldn't make any bets that you
>>>> could (after a lot of discussions) can get approval for a binary-only
>>>> release that simply references an SVN tag, or the like, but that's not
>>>
>>> your
>>>>
>>>> question, I assume?
>>>>
>>>> So, it is standard practice, and by far the esaiest (in particular for
>>>
>>> the
>>>>
>>>> users, for which we are targeting finally) way to go, to consider them
as
>>>> an important part of the release.
>>>>
>>>> Jochen
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:12 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Jochen,
>>>>>
>>>>> Binary, source, and java doc jars for the sub projects are available
in
>>>>> the repository. But I think that those are only convenience artifacts
>>>
>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> that we need to vote on the sources.
>>>>>
>>>>> Is that right?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Till
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Oct 1, 2013, at 0:13, Jochen Wiedmann <jo...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is is intentional, to provide a "source only" release?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (Which is, of course, perfectly fine, just somewhat unusual and
perhaps
>>>>>
>>>>> not
>>>>>>
>>>>>> what users expect.)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regardless of the answer, here's my
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 1, 2013 at 5:37 AM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>>>>>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sigs and checksums work, archive and tag agree, and the rat report
is
>>>>>>> consistent as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 30, 2013, at 6:31 PM, Till Westmann <ti...@westmann.org>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please verify and vote on the third release candidate for our first
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> release apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The tag to be voted on is
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/vxquery/tags/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The artifacts, signatures, md5, and sha1 are at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.asc
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.md5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachevxquery-109/org/apache/vxquery/apache-vxquery/0.2-incubating/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating-source-release.zip.sha1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The RAT report is at:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
http://people.apache.org/~tillw/apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating/rat-report.txt
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> and the KEYS file containing the PGP keys used to sign the release
>>>
>>> can
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> currently be found at
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/incubator/vxquery/KEYS
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The ASF's policy on release can be found here
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#approving-a-release
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 release this package as apache-vxquery-0.2-incubating
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 do not release this package because ...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Till
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>>>>>
>>>>> friends
>>>>>>
>>>>>> with the bully!"
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> "That's what prayers are ... it's frightened people trying to make
>>>
>>> friends
>>>>
>>>> with the bully!"
>>>>
>>>> Terry Pratchett. The Last Hero
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>