You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "joti (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org> on 2009/11/30 17:45:55 UTC
[jira] Created: (MASSEMBLY-451) unpackOptions: Documentation on
maven.apache.org differs from "The definitive Guide", the latter is right
unpackOptions: Documentation on maven.apache.org differs from "The definitive Guide", the latter is right
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: MASSEMBLY-451
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-451
Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: 2.2-beta-4
Environment: Maven 2.2.1, All operating systems.
Reporter: joti
Priority: Minor
Go to http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html
See Documentation on unpackOptions in/excludes.
The documentation raises the belief that it should be:
<excludes>foo</excludes>
instead of
<excludes>
<exclude>foo</exclude>
</excludes>
The latter is the way it is stated in the definitive guide.
The first way, is the way that it is stated in the overview for all in/excludes. Which is correct albeit irritating, maybe give a short example at the top how the abbreviated in/excludes-format is meant.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] Closed: (MASSEMBLY-451) unpackOptions: Documentation on
maven.apache.org differs from "The definitive Guide", the latter is right
Posted by "John Casey (JIRA)" <ji...@codehaus.org>.
[ http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-451?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
John Casey closed MASSEMBLY-451.
--------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.2-beta-6
Assignee: John Casey
> unpackOptions: Documentation on maven.apache.org differs from "The definitive Guide", the latter is right
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: MASSEMBLY-451
> URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MASSEMBLY-451
> Project: Maven 2.x Assembly Plugin
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.2-beta-4
> Environment: Maven 2.2.1, All operating systems.
> Reporter: joti
> Assignee: John Casey
> Priority: Minor
> Fix For: 2.2-beta-6
>
>
> Go to http://maven.apache.org/plugins/maven-assembly-plugin/assembly.html
> See Documentation on unpackOptions in/excludes.
> The documentation raises the belief that it should be:
> <excludes>foo</excludes>
> instead of
> <excludes>
> <exclude>foo</exclude>
> </excludes>
> The latter is the way it is stated in the definitive guide.
> The first way, is the way that it is stated in the overview for all in/excludes. Which is correct albeit irritating, maybe give a short example at the top how the abbreviated in/excludes-format is meant.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira