You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@gump.apache.org by Adam Jack <aj...@trysybase.com> on 2003/07/30 18:16:24 UTC
Anyone seen this?
It seems the ant is failing to run. I've seen other projects succeed w/o a xerces added, so is the xml-apis dependency somehow causing this problem?
regards
Adam
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Build juddi - juddi -- UDDI Toolkit/Repository
Wed Jul 30 06:29:55 EDT 2003
Module: definition home cvs
Dependencies: ant xml-axis commons-logging jakarta-servletapi junit checkstyle xml-apis
Buildfile: build.xml
BUILD FAILED
XML parser factory has not been configured correctly: Provider for javax.xml.parsers.SAXParserFactory cannot be found
Total time: 0 seconds
Re: Anyone seen this?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Fri, 01 Aug 2003, Leo Simons <le...@apache.org> wrote:
> that's the ant build itself if I'm not mistaken.
cat cmdline would tell you if you wanted to be sure, but it looks a
lot like dist-ant or test-ant. Does the log indicate where the
process is hanging?
In either case, some change in Ant could have triggered a VM bug
(RedHat 8 is not exactly Java's favorite Linux distribution).
Stefan
Re: Anyone seen this?
Posted by Leo Simons <le...@apache.org>.
Adam Jack wrote:
> Any clue when they started, or what they were? Can you link start time to
> the timestamps in the gump build log to correlate to a project?
yep, and I can do more than that:
[lsimons /proc/16903]$ pwd
/proc/16903
[lsimons /proc/16903]$ ls -al | grep cwd
lrwxrwxrwx 1 lsimons gump 0 Aug 1 13:00 cwd ->
/data/gump/ant
[lsimons /proc/16903]$ ps -aux | grep java
lsimons 16903 87.6 0.4 235716 1272 ? SN Jul31 1380:50 java
-Xbootclass
[lsimons /proc/16903]$ cat maps > ~/bad-process-memory-map.txt
that's the ant build itself if I'm not mistaken. I'm at a loss as to
what's causing this. I also can't tell when this started as I was on
vacation and the machine hung up in my absence. If anyone recalls seeing
the gump instance on my machine go down, that'd pinpoint the day. Also,
if anyone feels like doing more debugging, I'll get you access to the
machine.
grz,
- Leo
RE: Anyone seen this?
Posted by Adam Jack <aj...@trysybase.com>.
Any clue when they started, or what they were? Can you link start time to
the timestamps in the gump build log to correlate to a project?
regards
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: news [mailto:news@main.gmane.org]On Behalf Of Leo Simons
Sent: Wednesday, July 30, 2003 1:13 PM
To: gump@jakarta.apache.org
Subject: Re: Anyone seen this?
Adam Jack wrote:
> It seems the ant is failing to run. I've seen other projects succeed
> w/o a xerces added, so is the xml-apis dependency somehow causing
> this problem?
there's an issue here I am currently unable to figure out. Last 3 runs
before the run this night on lsd saw gump spawn a delinquent process
eating up 95% of processor time and never quitting (ie I had 3 of them
running, one of them had been on it for 3 days).
However, last night (GMT) things went fine and ant built, and instead
there's loads of dropped projects.
something is definately askew.
- Leo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: gump-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: gump-help@jakarta.apache.org
Re: Anyone seen this?
Posted by Leo Simons <le...@apache.org>.
Adam Jack wrote:
> It seems the ant is failing to run. I've seen other projects succeed
> w/o a xerces added, so is the xml-apis dependency somehow causing
> this problem?
there's an issue here I am currently unable to figure out. Last 3 runs
before the run this night on lsd saw gump spawn a delinquent process
eating up 95% of processor time and never quitting (ie I had 3 of them
running, one of them had been on it for 3 days).
However, last night (GMT) things went fine and ant built, and instead
there's loads of dropped projects.
something is definately askew.
- Leo
RE: Anyone seen this?
Posted by Adam Jack <aj...@trysybase.com>.
> so is the xml-apis dependency somehow causing this problem?
If you add xml-apis, you get a version of SAXFactory that is
configured to use Xerces as its default, unlike the one shipping with
1.4.x. So if you add xml-apis, you should add xerces as well.
Thank you, that makes good sense & totally explains it.
regards
Adam
Re: Anyone seen this?
Posted by Stefan Bodewig <bo...@apache.org>.
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Adam Jack <aj...@trysybase.com> wrote:
> I've seen other projects succeed w/o a xerces added,
Gump runs on 1.4.x by now, this includes a specific version of Crimson
and xml-apis.
> so is the xml-apis dependency somehow causing this problem?
If you add xml-apis, you get a version of SAXFactory that is
configured to use Xerces as its default, unlike the one shipping with
1.4.x. So if you add xml-apis, you should add xerces as well.
Stefan