You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xalan.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/03/10 04:56:19 UTC

[Bug 925] New - Need Xalan "fragment reexecution" interface

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=925

*** shadow/925	Fri Mar  9 19:56:19 2001
--- shadow/925.tmp.12030	Fri Mar  9 19:56:19 2001
***************
*** 0 ****
--- 1,29 ----
+ +============================================================================+
+ | Need Xalan "fragment reexecution" interface                                |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |        Bug #: 925                         Product: XalanJ2                 |
+ |       Status: NEW                         Version: 2.0.0                   |
+ |   Resolution:                            Platform: PC                      |
+ |     Severity: Enhancement              OS/Version:                         |
+ |     Priority:                           Component: Xalan                   |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |  Assigned To: xalan-dev@xml.apache.org                                     |
+ |  Reported By: scott_boag@lotus.com                                         |
+ |      CC list: Cc:                                                          |
+ +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
+ |          URL:                                                              |
+ +============================================================================+
+ |                              DESCRIPTION                                   |
+ From an IBM developer:
+ 
+ Dear Scott,
+ 
+ Here's the first friendly reminder that I'd be so happy once Xalan has methods 
+ to ...
+ 
+ get of copy of the execution state from within a SAXResult ContentHandler 
+ method,
+ restart execution from an existing execution state, and
+ stop execution from within a SAXResult ContentHandler method.
+ 
+ Thanks -- and I look forward to having fun with this :) -- Kristoffer