Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Move ORC to commit-then-review

[Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org>]

Ok, let's try CTR for now. Obviously we can switch back later if it doesn't
work out for us.

Thanks Alan & Prasanth,
   Owen

On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Prasanth J <j....@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1 for CTR.
>
> I think we should at least wait for +1 from pre-commit test run before
> commit so that we won’t break any tests or build.
>
> Thanks
> Prasanth
>
> > On May 31, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Alan Gates <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1, ORC is a small enough project (both in terms of number of
> contributors and code base) that CTR makes the most sense.
> >
> > Alan.
> >
> >> On May 28, 2016, at 23:02, Owen O'Malley <om...@apache.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> All,
> >>  While most of the Hadoop ecosystem projects including ORC work with a
> >> review-then-commit (RTC) process model, other Apache projects use
> >> commit-then-review (CTR) processes. However, as a small project, I think
> >> that we would be better served with CTR. What do other people think?
> >>
> >> .. Owen
> >
>
>