You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@unomi.apache.org by "Serge Huber (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/04/24 06:02:00 UTC
[jira] [Resolved] (UNOMI-442) Creating segment with past event
condition does not engage correctly existing profiles
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Serge Huber resolved UNOMI-442.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
> Creating segment with past event condition does not engage correctly existing profiles
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UNOMI-442
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-442
> Project: Apache Unomi
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 2.0.0, 1.5.5
> Reporter: Kevan Jahanshahi
> Priority: Major
> Fix For: 2.0.0, 1.5.5
>
> Time Spent: 40m
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> When you create a segment definition that contains a past event condition.
> * first we update all the existing profiles for the past event condition
> * then we update the profiles for the segment.
> But the second part is not working because the first part is delayed due to the usage of the BulkProcessor.
> So this actions are actually performed in the bad order.
> Proposed fixed: do not use the bulk processor to update profiles for the past event condition. This way the segment update will be able to engage correctly the profile to the segment.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)