You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com> on 2006/04/18 23:22:28 UTC
Intend to tag/roll 1.3.35
As long as we're doing releases, I'm planning on tagging and releasing
1.3.35 to align with the 2.0 and 2.2 release timeframe...
You've been warned :)
--
===========================================================================
Jim Jagielski [|] jim@jaguNET.com [|] http://www.jaguNET.com/
"If you can dodge a wrench, you can dodge a ball."
Re: Intend to tag/roll 1.3.35
Posted by Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>.
On Apr 18, 2006, at 5:32 PM, Seán C. Farley wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> As long as we're doing releases, I'm planning on tagging and
>> releasing
>> 1.3.35 to align with the 2.0 and 2.2 release timeframe...
>
> It would be nice to pick up a patch[1] I wrote a long time ago for the
> 1.3 series while working at IBM. It adds persistant connection
> support
> to mod_proxy. Most of the code was taken from the 2.0 series.
>
> Note: it probably does not apply cleanly any longer.
>
> Seán
> 1. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37373
> --
> sean-apache@farley.org
At this stage, as close as we are to doing 1.3.35,
as well as not knowing how cleanly this will patch
and work against a post-1.3.27 apache, I'm -1 on folding
this in.
I have no problem with revisiting this for 1.3.36.
Re: Intend to tag/roll 1.3.35
Posted by Ruediger Pluem <rp...@apache.org>.
On 04/19/2006 12:14 AM, Seán C. Farley wrote:
>
> Although it would be nice, I understand. Since I have not followed the
> 2.[02] series, please check the comment I made about connection timeouts
> to the origin server. Look for "Only GET/HEAD requests are re-used" in
> the patch. Would this apply to 2.[02]? There was some scenario that I
> cannot recall--I have slept since then--that would cause 502's to be
> sent to the client.
Please find a discussion for 2.2.x / trunk regarding this in
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200602.mbox/%3c20060220135107.GA4335@redhat.com%3e
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/httpd-dev/200602.mbox/%3c43F0FBFD.6040403@apache.org%3e
and the follow ups.
Currently this issue is open.
Regards
Rüdiger
Re: Intend to tag/roll 1.3.35
Posted by "Seán C. Farley" <se...@farley.org>.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
> Seán C. Farley wrote:
>>
>> It would be nice to pick up a patch[1] I wrote a long time ago for
>> the 1.3 series while working at IBM. It adds persistant connection
>> support to mod_proxy. Most of the code was taken from the 2.0
>> series.
>
> -0.5 here (not quite a veto but close).
>
> Apache 1.3 is effectively in maintainance. I can't fathom how this
> would be a maintainance patch, it definately appears to be feature
> creep ;-)
Although it would be nice, I understand. Since I have not followed the
2.[02] series, please check the comment I made about connection timeouts
to the origin server. Look for "Only GET/HEAD requests are re-used" in
the patch. Would this apply to 2.[02]? There was some scenario that I
cannot recall--I have slept since then--that would cause 502's to be
sent to the client.
Seán
--
sean-apache@farley.org
Re: Intend to tag/roll 1.3.35
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
Seán C. Farley wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
>> As long as we're doing releases, I'm planning on tagging and releasing
>> 1.3.35 to align with the 2.0 and 2.2 release timeframe...
>
>
> It would be nice to pick up a patch[1] I wrote a long time ago for the
> 1.3 series while working at IBM. It adds persistant connection support
> to mod_proxy. Most of the code was taken from the 2.0 series.
-0.5 here (not quite a veto but close).
Apache 1.3 is effectively in maintainance. I can't fathom how this would
be a maintainance patch, it definately appears to be feature creep ;-)
Re: Intend to tag/roll 1.3.35
Posted by "Seán C. Farley" <se...@farley.org>.
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> As long as we're doing releases, I'm planning on tagging and releasing
> 1.3.35 to align with the 2.0 and 2.2 release timeframe...
It would be nice to pick up a patch[1] I wrote a long time ago for the
1.3 series while working at IBM. It adds persistant connection support
to mod_proxy. Most of the code was taken from the 2.0 series.
Note: it probably does not apply cleanly any longer.
Seán
1. http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37373
--
sean-apache@farley.org