You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@camel.apache.org by diwakar <di...@nsn.com> on 2012/03/01 05:21:29 UTC

Re: Camel context

Hi, 

           The context is following
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-Components-as-Pojos-td5080073.html#a5080943.
           From the replies I understand that it should be fine to have
multiple DefaultCamelContext objects.

With Best Regards,
Diwakar


--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-context-tp5523994p5526870.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: Camel context

Posted by Babak Vahdat <ba...@swissonline.ch>.

Hi

The thread you're cross-pointing here did *not* claim anything about the
usage of one single Camel context versus using multiple ones.

The only concern of that thread was to make it clear that *even* in the
absence of Camel *routes* you could still benefit from using Camel as it
would still make life easier for you. For example in the case of
producing/consuming JMS messages.

Maybe go once again back to that thread and read all the responses
*carefully*.

Babak  

--
View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Camel-context-tp5523994p5527325.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.