You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org> on 2004/09/15 15:46:45 UTC
[VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Hi,
I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
Please test and vote,
Sander
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Sander Striker wrote:
>> From: "Sander Striker" <st...@apache.org>
>> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM
>
>
>> Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
>
> Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
> I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours).
Done.
Joshua.
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
> From: "Sander Striker" <st...@apache.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:49 PM
> Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
Could someone please take care of the httpd.apache.org site?
I'm in a bit of a bind currently (for at least another 1-2 hours).
Sander
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net>.
At 10:49 AM 9/15/2004, you wrote:
>Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle?
About one hour.
Bill
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Jess Holle <je...@ptc.com>.
Is there an ETA on the Win32 source bundle?
Thanks.
--
Jess Holle
Sander Striker wrote:
>From: "Joshua Slive" <jo...@slive.ca>
>Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:33 PM
>
>
>>On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>* Sander Striker (striker@apache.org) wrote :
>>>
>>>
>>>>Hi,
>>>>
>>>>I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
>>>>Please test and vote,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>+1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
>>>
>>>
>>+1
>>
>>Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.org), which is ia64 Linux.
>>
>>Joshua.
>>
>>
>
>Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
>
>Sander
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Sander Striker <st...@apache.org>.
From: "Joshua Slive" <jo...@slive.ca>
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 4:33 PM
>
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:
>
> > * Sander Striker (striker@apache.org) wrote :
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
> >> Please test and vote,
> >>
> > +1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
>
> +1
>
> Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.org), which is ia64 Linux.
>
> Joshua.
Thanks. I've moved the tarballs to the distribution area.
Sander
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Joshua Slive <jo...@slive.ca>.
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004, Thom May wrote:
> * Sander Striker (striker@apache.org) wrote :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
>> Please test and vote,
>>
> +1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
+1
Running on ajax.apache.org (www.eu.apache.org), which is ia64 Linux.
Joshua.
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Thom May <th...@planetarytramp.net>.
* Sander Striker (striker@apache.org) wrote :
> Hi,
>
> I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
> Please test and vote,
>
+1 on x86_64 linux. (Worker and prefork. perchild built but not tested)
-Thom
--
That sounds like a lot of work... Can we out source?
The Revolution will not be outsourced!
(Slick/Monique - Sinfest)
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Joe Orton <jo...@redhat.com>.
On Wed, Sep 15, 2004 at 03:46:45PM +0200, Sander Striker wrote:
> I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
> Please test and vote,
+1, build+httpd-test good on the usual Linuxes here, confirmed security
fixes for mod_dav_fs, ap_resolve_env and apr_uri_parse on x86_64.
joe
Re: [VOTE] Apache HTTP Server 2.0.51
Posted by Graham Leggett <mi...@sharp.fm>.
Sander Striker wrote:
> I've put the tarballs for 2.0.51 up at http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/.
> Please test and vote,
Tested the RPM build under RHEL3, and it worked fine: +1.
Regards,
Graham
--