You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spark.apache.org by Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> on 2018/07/17 17:59:52 UTC
[VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Hi everyone,
From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
<https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
.
This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
Please vote in the next 72 hours:
[+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
[-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
Thanks for voting, everyone!
--
Ryan Blue
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Alessandro Solimando <al...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On 18 July 2018 at 17:32, Xiao Li <ga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Like what Ryan and I discussed offline, the contents of implementation
> sketch is not part of this vote.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Xiao
>
> 2018-07-18 8:00 GMT-07:00 Russell Spitzer <ru...@gmail.com>:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido <ma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, <li...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cl...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and
>>>>>> developers, compared to the existing one which only supports
>>>>>> append/overwrite and doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC
>>>>>> table) well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 (not binding)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I
>>>>>>>> think we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write
>>>>>>>> operations for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs
>>>>>>>> to create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>>>>>>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> John Zhuge
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> ---
>>>> Takeshi Yamamuro
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Xiao Li <ga...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Like what Ryan and I discussed offline, the contents of implementation
sketch is not part of this vote.
Cheers,
Xiao
2018-07-18 8:00 GMT-07:00 Russell Spitzer <ru...@gmail.com>:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, <li...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cl...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers,
>>>>> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and
>>>>> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 (not binding)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I
>>>>>>> think we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write
>>>>>>> operations for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>>>>>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>>>>>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> John Zhuge
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> ---
>>> Takeshi Yamamuro
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Russell Spitzer <ru...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 1:32 AM Marco Gaido <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, <li...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jz...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (non-binding)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers,
>>>> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and
>>>> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well.
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 (not binding)
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I
>>>>>> think we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write
>>>>>> operations for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>>>>>> .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>>>>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>>>>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> John Zhuge
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> ---
>> Takeshi Yamamuro
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Marco Gaido <ma...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018, 07:43 Takeshi Yamamuro, <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jz...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (non-binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers,
>>> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and
>>> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well.
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 (not binding)
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>>
>>>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think
>>>>> we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations
>>>>> for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>>>>
>>>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>>>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>>
>>>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>>>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> John Zhuge
>>>>
>>>
>
> --
> ---
> Takeshi Yamamuro
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Takeshi Yamamuro <li...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:41 PM John Zhuge <jz...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers,
>> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and
>> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well.
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (not binding)
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think
>>>> we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations
>>>> for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>>>
>>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>>>> .
>>>>
>>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>>>
>>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>>
>>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ryan Blue
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>>
>>> --
>>> John Zhuge
>>>
>>
--
---
Takeshi Yamamuro
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by John Zhuge <jz...@apache.org>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:06 PM Wenchen Fan <cl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers,
> compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and
> doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well.
>
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 (not binding)
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think
>>> we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations
>>> for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>>
>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>>> .
>>>
>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>>
>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>>
>>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>>
>> --
>> John Zhuge
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Wenchen Fan <cl...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding). I think this is more clear to both users and developers,
compared to the existing one which only supports append/overwrite and
doesn't work with tables in data source(like JDBC table) well.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:06 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 (not binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
>> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
>> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>
>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>> .
>>
>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>
>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>
>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>>
>
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org>.
+1 (not binding)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>
> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
> .
>
> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>
> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>
> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
>
--
Ryan Blue
[RESULT] [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org>.
This vote passes with 4 binding +1s and 9 community +1s.
Thanks for taking the time to vote, everyone!
Binding votes:
Wenchen Fan
Xiao Li
Reynold Xin
Felix Cheung
Non-binding votes:
Ryan Blue
John Zhuge
Takeshi Yamamuro
Marco Gaido
Russel Spitzer
Alessandro Solimando
Henry Robinson
Dongjoon Hyun
Bruce Robbins
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 4:43 PM Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> +1
>
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* Bruce Robbins <be...@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 18, 2018 3:02 PM
> *To:* Ryan Blue
> *Cc:* Spark Dev List
> *Subject:* Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
>> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
>> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>
>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>> .
>>
>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>
>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>
>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>>
>
>
--
Ryan Blue
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Felix Cheung <fe...@hotmail.com>.
+1
________________________________
From: Bruce Robbins <be...@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 3:02 PM
To: Ryan Blue
Cc: Spark Dev List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org>> wrote:
Hi everyone,
From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans<https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>.
This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
Please vote in the next 72 hours:
[+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
[-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
Thanks for voting, everyone!
--
Ryan Blue
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Bruce Robbins <be...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:59 AM, Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>
> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
> .
>
> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>
> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>
> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Dongjoon Hyun <do...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding).
Bests,
Dongjoon.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 11:32 AM Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:12 AM Reynold Xin <rx...@databricks.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will
>> remove the existing plans.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think
>>> we have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations
>>> for DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>>
>>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>>> .
>>>
>>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>>
>>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>>
>>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>>
>>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ryan Blue
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Henry Robinson <he...@cloudera.com.INVALID>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:12 AM Reynold Xin <rx...@databricks.com> wrote:
> +1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will
> remove the existing plans.
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
>> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
>> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>>
>> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
>> .
>>
>> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
>> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>>
>> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>>
>> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
>> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>>
>> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Blue
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
Posted by Reynold Xin <rx...@databricks.com>.
+1 on this, on the condition that we can come up with a design that will
remove the existing plans.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 11:00 AM Ryan Blue <bl...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> From discussion on the proposal doc and the discussion thread, I think we
> have consensus around the plan to standardize logical write operations for
> DataSourceV2. I would like to call a vote on the proposal.
>
> The proposal doc is here: SPIP: Standardize SQL logical plans
> <https://docs.google.com/document/u/1/d/1gYm5Ji2Mge3QBdOliFV5gSPTKlX4q1DCBXIkiyMv62A/edit?ts=5ace0718&usp=gmail#heading=h.m45webtwxf2d>
> .
>
> This vote is for the plan in that doc. The related SPIP with APIs to
> create/alter/drop tables will be a separate vote.
>
> Please vote in the next 72 hours:
>
> [+1]: Spark should adopt the SPIP
> [-1]: Spark should not adopt the SPIP because . . .
>
> Thanks for voting, everyone!
>
> --
> Ryan Blue
>