You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Evan Platt <ev...@espphotography.com> on 2006/07/28 19:28:40 UTC
Rules for short spams?
I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI,
then about 2 more lines.
I've put a sample at http://www.espphotography.com/spam.txt . But
that's about what they generally are. Very short, to the point so to speak.
Any rules that would help these?
Thanks.
Evan
Re: Rules for short spams?
Posted by Benny Pedersen <me...@junc.org>.
On Fri, July 28, 2006 19:28, Evan Platt wrote:
> I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI,
> then about 2 more lines.
>
> I've put a sample at http://www.espphotography.com/spam.txt . But
> that's about what they generally are. Very short, to the point so to speak.
>
> Any rules that would help these?
http://www.uribl.com/ please add URI there if its missing
--
Benny
Re: Rules for short spams?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:03:12PM -0700, Evan Platt wrote:
> On a similiar note: I added
>
> urirhssub URIBL_BLACK multi.uribl.com. A 2
> urirhssub URIBL_GREY multi.uribl.com. A 4
>
> Any ideas?
Any reason you don't just use sa-update which has the uribl.com folks already
included, plus a bunch of other useful new rules?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Fry: Lucy Liu-bot, if I don't survive the corn, I want you to know that I
love you as much as a man can love a computerized image of a gorgeous
celebrity, which it turns out is a lot.
Re: Rules for short spams?
Posted by Evan Platt <ev...@espphotography.com>.
At 10:40 AM 7/28/2006, you wrote:
>Enable network tests. URIBL rules were basically invented for this
>type of spam, and they tend to work quite well.
It looks like I'm not, but I'm not able to see how to - I use
spamassassin on a os/x box. I call spamc from procmail
spamc -s 512000
All google search tells me to not call spamc with -l
On a similiar note: I added
urirhssub URIBL_BLACK multi.uribl.com. A 2
body URIBL_BLACK eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_BLACK')
describe URIBL_BLACK Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
tflags URIBL_BLACK net
score URIBL_BLACK 3.0
urirhssub URIBL_GREY multi.uribl.com. A 4
body URIBL_GREY eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_GREY')
describe URIBL_GREY Contains an URL listed in the URIBL greylist
tflags URIBL_GREY net
score URIBL_GREY 0.25
to my local.cf.
Now I'm seeing in my mail.log:
www spamd[269]: Use of uninitialized value in exists at
/Library/Perl/5.8.6/Mail/SpamAssassin/Plugin/URIDNSBL.pm line 718,
<GEN4> line 384.\n
Any ideas?
Thanks.
Evan
Re: Rules for short spams?
Posted by Kelson <ke...@speed.net>.
Evan Platt wrote:
> I'm getting hammered with short spams. Basically one line, a URI, then
> about 2 more lines.
...
> Any rules that would help these?
Enable network tests. URIBL rules were basically invented for this type
of spam, and they tend to work quite well.
--
Kelson Vibber
SpeedGate Communications <www.speed.net>