You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to ojb-user@db.apache.org by "J. Russell Smyth" <dr...@cox.net> on 2002/11/28 19:49:57 UTC

Re: Status of SapDB suport (newbie)

We are using OJB with SapDB, though not yet in a production. From what
we have experienced, it seems to work ok for our uses so far. I have not
had a chance to look into the unit test failures.

You should also note that there are failures on other platforms as well,
notably DB2 fails many tests. I do not know what the issues are, but I
know that there have been mentions on this list about them before. 

Of course, tracking and repairing the failures would be helpful ;-)

Russell
On Thu, 2002-11-28 at 10:15, detlef schulze wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just downloaded the current CVS version of ojb. I changed build.properties to use sapdb. bin/build junit gives me the following:
> 
> <snip>
> 
> junit-no-compile-no-prepare:
>     [junit] Running org.apache.ojb.broker.AllTests
>     [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties: file:/D:/cvsroot/jakarta-ojb/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
>     [junit] Tests run: 159, Failures: 2, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 82,298 sec
>     [junit] TEST org.apache.ojb.broker.AllTests FAILED
>     [junit] Running org.apache.ojb.odmg.AllTests
>     [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties: file:/D:/cvsroot/jakarta-ojb/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
>     [junit] Tests run: 144, Failures: 1, Errors: 3, Time elapsed: 82,789 sec
>     [junit] TEST org.apache.ojb.odmg.AllTests FAILED
>     [junit] Running org.apache.ojb.soda.AllTests
>     [junit] [BOOT] INFO: OJB.properties: file:/D:/cvsroot/jakarta-ojb/target/test/ojb/OJB.properties
>     [junit] Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Time elapsed: 3,245 sec
> 
> junit-no-compile:
> 
> junit:
> 
> BUILD SUCCESSFUL
> 
> <snip>
> 
> This brings me to the follwing question: it says BUILD SUCCESSFUL although many tests seem to have failed. Is this normal? Is sapDB (fully) supported or should i rather not use OJB with sapDB?
> 
> any comment on this very much appreciated
> 
> cheers,
> Detlef
> 
> 
>