You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@apr.apache.org by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com> on 2001/07/07 08:50:32 UTC
Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms.h apr_portable.h
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:42:24AM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote:
> BTW, do we still need to add the @deffunc lines as we don't seem to
> have been doing in some places. Is this a scandoc change Ben?
Ben's gone on record saying we don't use scandoc anymore, but doxygen.
(Check dev@apr archives around Jun 9th and 10th.)
Go figure. No one else seems to be aware of that. =) -- justin
Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms.h apr_portable.h
Posted by Ian Holsman <ia...@cnet.com>.
On 07 Jul 2001 00:27:03 -0700, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 08:24:17AM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> > Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:42:24AM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote:
> > > > BTW, do we still need to add the @deffunc lines as we don't seem to
> > > > have been doing in some places. Is this a scandoc change Ben?
> > >
> > > Ben's gone on record saying we don't use scandoc anymore, but doxygen.
> > > (Check dev@apr archives around Jun 9th and 10th.)
> > >
> > > Go figure. No one else seems to be aware of that. =) -- justin
> >
> > Ah yes, I meant doxygen not scandoc... That's what you get for being up
> > all night again :)
BTW...
I have a nightly job which runs doxygen on the httpd tree.. available on
docx.webperf.org
> >
> > Maybe Ben would be so kind as to answer this once and for all?
>
> Based on what Ben said in that earlier thread, doxygen doesn't use
> @deffunc (only scandoc does). No one has had the time to yank out
> all of those @deffunc lines with a perl script. Any perl hackers
> out there? -- justin
--
Ian Holsman
Performance Measurement & Analysis
CNET Networks - 415 364-8608
Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms.h apr_portable.h
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 08:24:17AM +0100, David Reid wrote:
> Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:42:24AM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote:
> > > BTW, do we still need to add the @deffunc lines as we don't seem to
> > > have been doing in some places. Is this a scandoc change Ben?
> >
> > Ben's gone on record saying we don't use scandoc anymore, but doxygen.
> > (Check dev@apr archives around Jun 9th and 10th.)
> >
> > Go figure. No one else seems to be aware of that. =) -- justin
>
> Ah yes, I meant doxygen not scandoc... That's what you get for being up
> all night again :)
>
> Maybe Ben would be so kind as to answer this once and for all?
Based on what Ben said in that earlier thread, doxygen doesn't use
@deffunc (only scandoc does). No one has had the time to yank out
all of those @deffunc lines with a perl script. Any perl hackers
out there? -- justin
Re: cvs commit: apr/include apr_sms.h apr_portable.h
Posted by David Reid <dr...@jetnet.co.uk>.
Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 06:42:24AM -0000, dreid@apache.org wrote:
> > BTW, do we still need to add the @deffunc lines as we don't seem to
> > have been doing in some places. Is this a scandoc change Ben?
>
> Ben's gone on record saying we don't use scandoc anymore, but doxygen.
> (Check dev@apr archives around Jun 9th and 10th.)
>
> Go figure. No one else seems to be aware of that. =) -- justin
Ah yes, I meant doxygen not scandoc... That's what you get for being up
all night again :)
Maybe Ben would be so kind as to answer this once and for all?
david