Release 4.6 timeline

[Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>]

Hi Jia,
I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have some more
time to include BP14 in 4.6.
I think that 3 weeks would be good.

Thoughts?

Enrico
-- 


-- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>]

It will be 4.7.0 - http://bookkeeper.apache.org/community/releases/ has the
release schedule and related timelines.

- Sijie



On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:02 PM, Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> wrote:

> I think BP-14 should be bumped to 4.7.0. It's very late in the release
> cycle for such a large feature to go in. When is the next release
> planned after 4.6.0?
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > we also need cycles to fill up the documentation for the new features
> > introduced in 4.6.0, like new API, http endpoints.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> just a reminder here - it has been 2 weeks pass the planned code freeze
> >> week and 2 weeks left for the deadline of 4.6.0 release.
> >>
> >> It is our first release after switch to a time-based release schedule.
> It
> >> would be great that we can stick to the release schedule.
> >>
> >> We already 131 closed issues and 16 open issues for 4.6.0. There are
> quite
> >> a lot of good changes there:
> >>
> >> - fileinfo cache improvement
> >> - replication worker fixes for respecting to placement policy
> >> - http endpoints
> >> - new ledger api
> >> - lifecycle components
> >> - persistable bookie status
> >> - abstract service discovery interface
> >> - protobuf upgrade
> >> - gc related improvements (using netty recycle object pools)
> >>
> >> If BP-14 is going to take much longer time, I would suggest moving it
> into
> >> next release cycle.
> >>
> >> - Sijie
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 👍
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Il ven 20 ott 2017, 06:51 Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> > Thank you
> >>> > Maybe this way we will have time to clean up a few flaky tests
> >>> >
> >>> > Enrico
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi Jia,
> >>> > > > I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have
> some
> >>> > more
> >>> > > > time to include BP14 in 4.6.
> >>> > > > I think that 3 weeks would be good.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thoughts?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Enrico
> >>> > > > --
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > --
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>]

Il lun 30 ott 2017, 20:02 Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org> ha scritto:

> I think BP-14 should be bumped to 4.7.0. It's very late in the release
> cycle for such a large feature to go in.


I agree.
Let's finalize 4.6 and move BP14 to 4.7

Enrico



When is the next release
> planned after 4.6.0?
>
> -Ivan
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > we also need cycles to fill up the documentation for the new features
> > introduced in 4.6.0, like new API, http endpoints.
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> just a reminder here - it has been 2 weeks pass the planned code freeze
> >> week and 2 weeks left for the deadline of 4.6.0 release.
> >>
> >> It is our first release after switch to a time-based release schedule.
> It
> >> would be great that we can stick to the release schedule.
> >>
> >> We already 131 closed issues and 16 open issues for 4.6.0. There are
> quite
> >> a lot of good changes there:
> >>
> >> - fileinfo cache improvement
> >> - replication worker fixes for respecting to placement policy
> >> - http endpoints
> >> - new ledger api
> >> - lifecycle components
> >> - persistable bookie status
> >> - abstract service discovery interface
> >> - protobuf upgrade
> >> - gc related improvements (using netty recycle object pools)
> >>
> >> If BP-14 is going to take much longer time, I would suggest moving it
> into
> >> next release cycle.
> >>
> >> - Sijie
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> 👍
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> > Il ven 20 ott 2017, 06:51 Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >>> >
> >>> > > Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.
> >>> > >
> >>> >
> >>> > Thank you
> >>> > Maybe this way we will have time to clean up a few flaky tests
> >>> >
> >>> > Enrico
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
> >>> eolivelli@gmail.com>
> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > > Hi Jia,
> >>> > > > I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have
> some
> >>> > more
> >>> > > > time to include BP14 in 4.6.
> >>> > > > I think that 3 weeks would be good.
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Thoughts?
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > Enrico
> >>> > > > --
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > >
> >>> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> > > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > --
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >>> >
> >>>
> >>
> >>
>
-- 


-- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Ivan Kelly <iv...@apache.org>]

I think BP-14 should be bumped to 4.7.0. It's very late in the release
cycle for such a large feature to go in. When is the next release
planned after 4.6.0?

-Ivan

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 8:00 PM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> we also need cycles to fill up the documentation for the new features
> introduced in 4.6.0, like new API, http endpoints.
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> just a reminder here - it has been 2 weeks pass the planned code freeze
>> week and 2 weeks left for the deadline of 4.6.0 release.
>>
>> It is our first release after switch to a time-based release schedule. It
>> would be great that we can stick to the release schedule.
>>
>> We already 131 closed issues and 16 open issues for 4.6.0. There are quite
>> a lot of good changes there:
>>
>> - fileinfo cache improvement
>> - replication worker fixes for respecting to placement policy
>> - http endpoints
>> - new ledger api
>> - lifecycle components
>> - persistable bookie status
>> - abstract service discovery interface
>> - protobuf upgrade
>> - gc related improvements (using netty recycle object pools)
>>
>> If BP-14 is going to take much longer time, I would suggest moving it into
>> next release cycle.
>>
>> - Sijie
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> 👍
>>>
>>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Il ven 20 ott 2017, 06:51 Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>>> >
>>> > > Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Thank you
>>> > Maybe this way we will have time to clean up a few flaky tests
>>> >
>>> > Enrico
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
>>> eolivelli@gmail.com>
>>> > > wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > > > Hi Jia,
>>> > > > I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have some
>>> > more
>>> > > > time to include BP14 in 4.6.
>>> > > > I think that 3 weeks would be good.
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Thoughts?
>>> > > >
>>> > > > Enrico
>>> > > > --
>>> > > >
>>> > > >
>>> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> > > >
>>> > >
>>> > --
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>]

we also need cycles to fill up the documentation for the new features
introduced in 4.6.0, like new API, http endpoints.

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 11:58 AM, Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> just a reminder here - it has been 2 weeks pass the planned code freeze
> week and 2 weeks left for the deadline of 4.6.0 release.
>
> It is our first release after switch to a time-based release schedule. It
> would be great that we can stick to the release schedule.
>
> We already 131 closed issues and 16 open issues for 4.6.0. There are quite
> a lot of good changes there:
>
> - fileinfo cache improvement
> - replication worker fixes for respecting to placement policy
> - http endpoints
> - new ledger api
> - lifecycle components
> - persistable bookie status
> - abstract service discovery interface
> - protobuf upgrade
> - gc related improvements (using netty recycle object pools)
>
> If BP-14 is going to take much longer time, I would suggest moving it into
> next release cycle.
>
> - Sijie
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 👍
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Il ven 20 ott 2017, 06:51 Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>> >
>> > > Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Thank you
>> > Maybe this way we will have time to clean up a few flaky tests
>> >
>> > Enrico
>> >
>> >
>> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <
>> eolivelli@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > Hi Jia,
>> > > > I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have some
>> > more
>> > > > time to include BP14 in 4.6.
>> > > > I think that 3 weeks would be good.
>> > > >
>> > > > Thoughts?
>> > > >
>> > > > Enrico
>> > > > --
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> > > >
>> > >
>> > --
>> >
>> >
>> > -- Enrico Olivelli
>> >
>>
>
>

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Sijie Guo <gu...@gmail.com>]

Hi all,

just a reminder here - it has been 2 weeks pass the planned code freeze
week and 2 weeks left for the deadline of 4.6.0 release.

It is our first release after switch to a time-based release schedule. It
would be great that we can stick to the release schedule.

We already 131 closed issues and 16 open issues for 4.6.0. There are quite
a lot of good changes there:

- fileinfo cache improvement
- replication worker fixes for respecting to placement policy
- http endpoints
- new ledger api
- lifecycle components
- persistable bookie status
- abstract service discovery interface
- protobuf upgrade
- gc related improvements (using netty recycle object pools)

If BP-14 is going to take much longer time, I would suggest moving it into
next release cycle.

- Sijie


On Sat, Oct 21, 2017 at 4:27 AM, Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 👍
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Il ven 20 ott 2017, 06:51 Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> >
> > > Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.
> > >
> >
> > Thank you
> > Maybe this way we will have time to clean up a few flaky tests
> >
> > Enrico
> >
> >
> > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eolivelli@gmail.com
> >
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Jia,
> > > > I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have some
> > more
> > > > time to include BP14 in 4.6.
> > > > I think that 3 weeks would be good.
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts?
> > > >
> > > > Enrico
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com>]

👍

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Il ven 20 ott 2017, 06:51 Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
>
> > Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.
> >
>
> Thank you
> Maybe this way we will have time to clean up a few flaky tests
>
> Enrico
>
>
> > On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Jia,
> > > I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have some
> more
> > > time to include BP14 in 4.6.
> > > I think that 3 weeks would be good.
> > >
> > > Thoughts?
> > >
> > > Enrico
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > -- Enrico Olivelli
> > >
> >
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>]

Il ven 20 ott 2017, 06:51 Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com> ha scritto:

> Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.
>

Thank you
Maybe this way we will have time to clean up a few flaky tests

Enrico


> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Jia,
> > I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have some more
> > time to include BP14 in 4.6.
> > I think that 3 weeks would be good.
> >
> > Thoughts?
> >
> > Enrico
> > --
> >
> >
> > -- Enrico Olivelli
> >
>
-- 


-- Enrico Olivelli

Re: Release 4.6 timeline

[Jia Zhai <zh...@gmail.com>]

Sounds good to me. Let's postpone it.

On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:37 AM, Enrico Olivelli <eo...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Jia,
> I think it would be time to freeze 4.6 but I would like to have some more
> time to include BP14 in 4.6.
> I think that 3 weeks would be good.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> Enrico
> --
>
>
> -- Enrico Olivelli
>