You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@lucenenet.apache.org by Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> on 2007/02/22 14:40:34 UTC
Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Hello,
I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
IPort :Lucene.Net2.0 and Java lucene2.0
Thanks
LM
RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Yes, I had to remove all 2.0 ZIP "releases" until when I straighten things
out about releases. Your only option right now is to get the source off
SVN.
I will say more about it in response to Erik's email: "good incubator
citizen".
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Mitiaguin [mailto:mitiaguin@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:35 AM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
if you read readme.txt at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/site/download/
===
As of February 21, 2007, all 2.0 releases of Lucene.Net, Highlighter.Net,
Snowball.Net, SpellChecker.Net, and WordNet.Net have been removed pending
ASF release process review and proper packaging and inclusion of legal
files.
-- George Aroush
===
I don't know what differences are between my check out and your download .
So you may either try to use external adapter if your code identical (
similar )to mine ( I gave an excerpt in previous email ) or wait when
download with Net 2 built-in compression will be available.
On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using Lucene.Net 2.0,..
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Honestly , now I am not sure now what I checked out . I just
> > selected head trunk in tortoiseSVN screen . But just browsing the
> > code it seems to be strange to see : ( I thought there is no
> > backward computability )
> >
> > SupportClass.cs
> >
> > /// <summary>
> > /// Use for .NET 1.1 Framework only.
> > /// </summary>
> > public class CompressionSupport
> > {
> > public interface ICompressionAdapter
> > {
> > byte[] Compress(byte[] input);
> > byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input);
> > }
> >
> > private static ICompressionAdapter compressionAdapter;
> >
> > public static byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input)
> > {
> > CheckCompressionSupport();
> > return compressionAdapter.Uncompress(input);
> > }
> >
> > public static byte[] Compress(byte[] input)
> > {
> > CheckCompressionSupport();
> > return compressionAdapter.Compress(input);
> > }
> >
> > private static void CheckCompressionSupport()
> > {
> > if (compressionAdapter == null)
> > {
> > System.String compressionLibClassName =
> > SupportClass.AppSettings.Get("Lucene.Net.CompressionLib.class", null);
> > if (compressionLibClassName == null)
> > throw new System.SystemException("Compression
> > support not configured");
> >
> > Type compressionLibClass =
> > Type.GetType(compressionLibClassName, true);
> > System.Object compressionAdapterObj =
> > Activator.CreateInstance(compressionLibClass);
> > compressionAdapter = compressionAdapterObj as
> > ICompressionAdapter;
> > if (compressionAdapter == null)
> > throw new System.SystemException("Compression
> > adapter does not support the ICompressionAdapter interface");
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Also I don't what version you are using . If you are in 1.9 try the
> > following , why there is no recognition for Net 2 , I don't know :
> >
> > SharpZipLibAdapter.cs
> > /// To enable compression support in Lucene.Net 1.9 using .NET 1.1.
> > Framework, /// you will need to define 'SHARP_ZIP_LIB' and referance
> > the SharpLibZip /// library. The SharpLibZip library can be downloaded
from:
> > /// http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/
> > ///
> > /// You can use any other cmpression library you have by plugging it
> > into this /// code or by providing your own adapter as in this one.
> >
> >
> > #if SHARP_ZIP_LIB
> > ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > ok..thanks...
> > >
> > > but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion
> > > > version and there were failed tests . One of them :
> > > > Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
> > > > System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we expect some tests to fail ?
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> > > > > exception...while searching using .Net code..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross
> > > > > > compatible. If fact, if you share the lock file, you can
> > > > > > have a Java and a C# Lucene read/write to the same index
> > > > > > concurrently. Just make sure you are using the same release
version if you do this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- George Aroush
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > > > > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java
> > > > > > > code and after that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so
what should i do ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just
> > > > > > work" without anything special.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dean.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com>.
if you read readme.txt at
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/lucene.net/site/download/
===
As of February 21, 2007, all 2.0 releases of Lucene.Net,
Highlighter.Net, Snowball.Net, SpellChecker.Net, and WordNet.Net have
been removed pending ASF release process review and proper packaging
and inclusion of legal files.
-- George Aroush
===
I don't know what differences are between my check out and your download .
So you may either try to use external adapter if your code identical (
similar )to mine ( I gave an excerpt in previous email ) or wait when
download with Net 2 built-in compression will be available.
On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am using Lucene.Net 2.0,..
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Honestly , now I am not sure now what I checked out . I just selected
> > head trunk in tortoiseSVN screen . But just browsing the code it
> > seems to be strange to see : ( I thought there is no backward
> > computability )
> >
> > SupportClass.cs
> >
> > /// <summary>
> > /// Use for .NET 1.1 Framework only.
> > /// </summary>
> > public class CompressionSupport
> > {
> > public interface ICompressionAdapter
> > {
> > byte[] Compress(byte[] input);
> > byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input);
> > }
> >
> > private static ICompressionAdapter compressionAdapter;
> >
> > public static byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input)
> > {
> > CheckCompressionSupport();
> > return compressionAdapter.Uncompress(input);
> > }
> >
> > public static byte[] Compress(byte[] input)
> > {
> > CheckCompressionSupport();
> > return compressionAdapter.Compress(input);
> > }
> >
> > private static void CheckCompressionSupport()
> > {
> > if (compressionAdapter == null)
> > {
> > System.String compressionLibClassName =
> > SupportClass.AppSettings.Get("Lucene.Net.CompressionLib.class", null);
> > if (compressionLibClassName == null)
> > throw new System.SystemException("Compression
> > support not configured");
> >
> > Type compressionLibClass =
> > Type.GetType(compressionLibClassName, true);
> > System.Object compressionAdapterObj =
> > Activator.CreateInstance(compressionLibClass);
> > compressionAdapter = compressionAdapterObj as
> > ICompressionAdapter;
> > if (compressionAdapter == null)
> > throw new System.SystemException("Compression
> > adapter does not support the ICompressionAdapter interface");
> > }
> > }
> > }
> > }
> >
> > Also I don't what version you are using . If you are in 1.9 try the
> > following , why there is no recognition for Net 2 , I don't know :
> >
> > SharpZipLibAdapter.cs
> > /// To enable compression support in Lucene.Net 1.9 using .NET 1.1. Framework,
> > /// you will need to define 'SHARP_ZIP_LIB' and referance the SharpLibZip
> > /// library. The SharpLibZip library can be downloaded from:
> > /// http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/
> > ///
> > /// You can use any other cmpression library you have by plugging it into this
> > /// code or by providing your own adapter as in this one.
> >
> >
> > #if SHARP_ZIP_LIB
> > ...
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > ok..thanks...
> > >
> > > but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ?
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion version
> > > > and there were failed tests . One of them :
> > > > Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
> > > > System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Do we expect some tests to fail ?
> > > >
> > > > Michael
> > > >
> > > > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> > > > > exception...while searching using .Net code..
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > > > > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross compatible. If
> > > > > > fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a Java and a C# Lucene
> > > > > > read/write to the same index concurrently. Just make sure you are using the
> > > > > > same release version if you do this.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -- George Aroush
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > > > > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> > > > > > > that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
> > > > > > anything special.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Dean.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com>.
I am using Lucene.Net 2.0,..
On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Honestly , now I am not sure now what I checked out . I just selected
> head trunk in tortoiseSVN screen . But just browsing the code it
> seems to be strange to see : ( I thought there is no backward
> computability )
>
> SupportClass.cs
>
> /// <summary>
> /// Use for .NET 1.1 Framework only.
> /// </summary>
> public class CompressionSupport
> {
> public interface ICompressionAdapter
> {
> byte[] Compress(byte[] input);
> byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input);
> }
>
> private static ICompressionAdapter compressionAdapter;
>
> public static byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input)
> {
> CheckCompressionSupport();
> return compressionAdapter.Uncompress(input);
> }
>
> public static byte[] Compress(byte[] input)
> {
> CheckCompressionSupport();
> return compressionAdapter.Compress(input);
> }
>
> private static void CheckCompressionSupport()
> {
> if (compressionAdapter == null)
> {
> System.String compressionLibClassName =
> SupportClass.AppSettings.Get("Lucene.Net.CompressionLib.class", null);
> if (compressionLibClassName == null)
> throw new System.SystemException("Compression
> support not configured");
>
> Type compressionLibClass =
> Type.GetType(compressionLibClassName, true);
> System.Object compressionAdapterObj =
> Activator.CreateInstance(compressionLibClass);
> compressionAdapter = compressionAdapterObj as
> ICompressionAdapter;
> if (compressionAdapter == null)
> throw new System.SystemException("Compression
> adapter does not support the ICompressionAdapter interface");
> }
> }
> }
> }
>
> Also I don't what version you are using . If you are in 1.9 try the
> following , why there is no recognition for Net 2 , I don't know :
>
> SharpZipLibAdapter.cs
> /// To enable compression support in Lucene.Net 1.9 using .NET 1.1. Framework,
> /// you will need to define 'SHARP_ZIP_LIB' and referance the SharpLibZip
> /// library. The SharpLibZip library can be downloaded from:
> /// http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/
> ///
> /// You can use any other cmpression library you have by plugging it into this
> /// code or by providing your own adapter as in this one.
>
>
> #if SHARP_ZIP_LIB
> ...
>
>
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > ok..thanks...
> >
> > but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ?
> >
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion version
> > > and there were failed tests . One of them :
> > > Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
> > > System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
> > >
> > >
> > > Do we expect some tests to fail ?
> > >
> > > Michael
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> > > > exception...while searching using .Net code..
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > > > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross compatible. If
> > > > > fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a Java and a C# Lucene
> > > > > read/write to the same index concurrently. Just make sure you are using the
> > > > > same release version if you do this.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- George Aroush
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > > > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > > > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> > > > >
> > > > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> > > > > > that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
> > > > >
> > > > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
> > > > > anything special.
> > > > >
> > > > > Dean.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Hi Michael,
You checked out the latest code base. Look in the AssemblyInfo.cs file and
it should be "[assembly: AssemblyVersion("2.0.0.003")]" -- if so, then you
have the latest version.
In order for the NUnit test to pass the compression test, you have to setup
and provide your compression library. Try SharpZipLib
(http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/)
Regards,
-- George Aroush
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Mitiaguin [mailto:mitiaguin@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 23, 2007 12:09 AM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Honestly , now I am not sure now what I checked out . I just selected head
trunk in tortoiseSVN screen . But just browsing the code it seems to be
strange to see : ( I thought there is no backward computability )
SupportClass.cs
/// <summary>
/// Use for .NET 1.1 Framework only.
/// </summary>
public class CompressionSupport
{
public interface ICompressionAdapter
{
byte[] Compress(byte[] input);
byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input);
}
private static ICompressionAdapter compressionAdapter;
public static byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input)
{
CheckCompressionSupport();
return compressionAdapter.Uncompress(input);
}
public static byte[] Compress(byte[] input)
{
CheckCompressionSupport();
return compressionAdapter.Compress(input);
}
private static void CheckCompressionSupport()
{
if (compressionAdapter == null)
{
System.String compressionLibClassName =
SupportClass.AppSettings.Get("Lucene.Net.CompressionLib.class", null);
if (compressionLibClassName == null)
throw new System.SystemException("Compression
support not configured");
Type compressionLibClass =
Type.GetType(compressionLibClassName, true);
System.Object compressionAdapterObj =
Activator.CreateInstance(compressionLibClass);
compressionAdapter = compressionAdapterObj as
ICompressionAdapter;
if (compressionAdapter == null)
throw new System.SystemException("Compression
adapter does not support the ICompressionAdapter interface");
}
}
}
}
Also I don't what version you are using . If you are in 1.9 try the
following , why there is no recognition for Net 2 , I don't know :
SharpZipLibAdapter.cs
/// To enable compression support in Lucene.Net 1.9 using .NET 1.1.
Framework, /// you will need to define 'SHARP_ZIP_LIB' and referance the
SharpLibZip /// library. The SharpLibZip library can be downloaded from:
/// http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/
///
/// You can use any other cmpression library you have by plugging it into
this /// code or by providing your own adapter as in this one.
#if SHARP_ZIP_LIB
...
On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok..thanks...
>
> but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ?
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion version
> > and there were failed tests . One of them :
> > Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
> > System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
> >
> >
> > Do we expect some tests to fail ?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> > > exception...while searching using .Net code..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross
> > > > compatible. If fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a
> > > > Java and a C# Lucene read/write to the same index concurrently.
> > > > Just make sure you are using the same release version if you do
this.
> > > >
> > > > -- George Aroush
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> > > >
> > > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code
> > > > > and after that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should
i do ?
> > > >
> > > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work"
> > > > without anything special.
> > > >
> > > > Dean.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com>.
Honestly , now I am not sure now what I checked out . I just selected
head trunk in tortoiseSVN screen . But just browsing the code it
seems to be strange to see : ( I thought there is no backward
computability )
SupportClass.cs
/// <summary>
/// Use for .NET 1.1 Framework only.
/// </summary>
public class CompressionSupport
{
public interface ICompressionAdapter
{
byte[] Compress(byte[] input);
byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input);
}
private static ICompressionAdapter compressionAdapter;
public static byte[] Uncompress(byte[] input)
{
CheckCompressionSupport();
return compressionAdapter.Uncompress(input);
}
public static byte[] Compress(byte[] input)
{
CheckCompressionSupport();
return compressionAdapter.Compress(input);
}
private static void CheckCompressionSupport()
{
if (compressionAdapter == null)
{
System.String compressionLibClassName =
SupportClass.AppSettings.Get("Lucene.Net.CompressionLib.class", null);
if (compressionLibClassName == null)
throw new System.SystemException("Compression
support not configured");
Type compressionLibClass =
Type.GetType(compressionLibClassName, true);
System.Object compressionAdapterObj =
Activator.CreateInstance(compressionLibClass);
compressionAdapter = compressionAdapterObj as
ICompressionAdapter;
if (compressionAdapter == null)
throw new System.SystemException("Compression
adapter does not support the ICompressionAdapter interface");
}
}
}
}
Also I don't what version you are using . If you are in 1.9 try the
following , why there is no recognition for Net 2 , I don't know :
SharpZipLibAdapter.cs
/// To enable compression support in Lucene.Net 1.9 using .NET 1.1. Framework,
/// you will need to define 'SHARP_ZIP_LIB' and referance the SharpLibZip
/// library. The SharpLibZip library can be downloaded from:
/// http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/
///
/// You can use any other cmpression library you have by plugging it into this
/// code or by providing your own adapter as in this one.
#if SHARP_ZIP_LIB
...
On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> ok..thanks...
>
> but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ?
>
>
> On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion version
> > and there were failed tests . One of them :
> > Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
> > System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
> >
> >
> > Do we expect some tests to fail ?
> >
> > Michael
> >
> > On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> > > exception...while searching using .Net code..
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross compatible. If
> > > > fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a Java and a C# Lucene
> > > > read/write to the same index concurrently. Just make sure you are using the
> > > > same release version if you do this.
> > > >
> > > > -- George Aroush
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> > > >
> > > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> > > > > that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
> > > >
> > > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
> > > > anything special.
> > > >
> > > > Dean.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Hi Laxmilal,
The current releases of Lucene.Net uses .NET 1.1 framework. Since .NET 1.1
doesn't have compression support, and since I can't add a 3rd party code
into ASF, I had to come up with a workaround. The workaround is the class
CompressionSupport.
If you need to support compressed field, use this class to supply to it a
compression library. I have not tried this, but other folks told me that
using SharpZipLib (http://www.icsharpcode.net/OpenSource/SharpZipLib/) works
and the index remains compatible with Java's Lucene.
Regards,
-- George
-----Original Message-----
From: Laxmilal Menaria [mailto:menarialaxmilal@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 11:34 PM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
ok..thanks...
but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ?
On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion version
> and there were failed tests . One of them :
> Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
> System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
>
>
> Do we expect some tests to fail ?
>
> Michael
>
> On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> > exception...while searching using .Net code..
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross
> > > compatible. If fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a
> > > Java and a C# Lucene read/write to the same index concurrently.
> > > Just make sure you are using the same release version if you do this.
> > >
> > > -- George Aroush
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> > >
> > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and
> > > > after that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do
?
> > >
> > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work"
> > > without anything special.
> > >
> > > Dean.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com>.
ok..thanks...
but what should i do for now .. any other way.. ?
On 2/23/07, Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion version
> and there were failed tests . One of them :
> Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
> System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
>
>
> Do we expect some tests to fail ?
>
> Michael
>
> On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> > exception...while searching using .Net code..
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross compatible. If
> > > fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a Java and a C# Lucene
> > > read/write to the same index concurrently. Just make sure you are using the
> > > same release version if you do this.
> > >
> > > -- George Aroush
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> > >
> > > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> > > > that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
> > >
> > > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
> > > anything special.
> > >
> > > Dean.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by Michael Mitiaguin <mi...@gmail.com>.
Coincidentally I've just run Nunit tests against subversion version
and there were failed tests . One of them :
Lucene.Net.Document.TestBinaryDocument.TestBinaryFieldInIndex :
System.SystemException : Compression support not configured
Do we expect some tests to fail ?
Michael
On 2/23/07, Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
> exception...while searching using .Net code..
>
>
>
> On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> > Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross compatible. If
> > fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a Java and a C# Lucene
> > read/write to the same index concurrently. Just make sure you are using the
> > same release version if you do this.
> >
> > -- George Aroush
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> > To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> >
> > > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> > > that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
> >
> > The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
> > anything special.
> >
> > Dean.
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by Laxmilal Menaria <me...@gmail.com>.
I have tried, Its gives me "Compression not configured"
exception...while searching using .Net code..
On 2/23/07, George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net> wrote:
> Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross compatible. If
> fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a Java and a C# Lucene
> read/write to the same index concurrently. Just make sure you are using the
> same release version if you do this.
>
> -- George Aroush
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
> Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
> To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
>
> > I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> > that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
>
> The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
> anything special.
>
> Dean.
>
>
>
RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by George Aroush <ge...@aroush.net>.
Yes, the index generated by Java or C# Lucene are cross compatible. If
fact, if you share the lock file, you can have a Java and a C# Lucene
read/write to the same index concurrently. Just make sure you are using the
same release version if you do this.
-- George Aroush
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Harding [mailto:dean.harding@dload.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, February 22, 2007 4:24 PM
To: lucene-net-user@incubator.apache.org
Subject: RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
> I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
anything special.
Dean.
RE: Search using .Net code in Java based Index
Posted by Dean Harding <de...@dload.com.au>.
> I am lucene user and I have created a Index using Java code and after
> that I wants to search using VB.Net code, so what should i do ?
The file format is the same, I believe, so it should "just work" without
anything special.
Dean.