You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org on 2021/03/19 00:04:29 UTC
[Bug 7893] New: Add reply-to lists
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7893
Bug ID: 7893
Summary: Add reply-to lists
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Hardware: All
OS: All
Status: NEW
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: spamassassin
Assignee: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
Reporter: jidanni@jidanni.org
Target Milestone: Undefined
On Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf we lean about the various
...list_from
...list_to
OK, that is great, but besides From: and To:, Reply-to: is a next best
contender for its own list.
Else folks would need to do e.g.,
header J_FACEBOOK_ADS Reply-To=~/noreply-ads\@facebookmail\.com/
score J_FACEBOOK_ADS 188
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7893] Add reply-to lists
Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7893
Henrik Krohns <ap...@hege.li> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #3 from Henrik Krohns <ap...@hege.li> ---
(In reply to Henrik Krohns from comment #2)
> Admittedly it's not documented anywhere, so I'll leave this open if someone
> wants to type stuff..
Actually there already is Bug 7767 for WLBLEval documentation, so closing this
one.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7893] Add reply-to lists
Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7893
Henrik Krohns <ap...@hege.li> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |apache@hege.li
--- Comment #2 from Henrik Krohns <ap...@hege.li> ---
It's already possible with WLBLEval check_replyto_in_list(), examples in
72_active.cf:
enlist_addrlist (SUSP_NTLD) *@*.vip
header __REPLYTO_ADDRLIST_SUSPNTLD eval:check_replyto_in_list('SUSP_NTLD')
Admittedly it's not documented anywhere, so I'll leave this open if someone
wants to type stuff..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Bug 7893] Add reply-to lists
Posted by bu...@spamassassin.apache.org.
https://bz.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=7893
Kevin A. McGrail <km...@apache.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |kmcgrail@apache.org
--- Comment #1 from Kevin A. McGrail <km...@apache.org> ---
Doesn't answer your request but HashBL has the ability to do RBL lookups based
on headers including Reply-To and is implemented in KAM.cf if you want to look
at an example.
That's what I use and why I don't have much impetus to work on a block based on
reply-to though I agree it's abused.
A patch to add the feature for 4.0 would be considered if you want to bang on
some keys.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.