You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user-cs@ibatis.apache.org by Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> on 2005/06/29 20:56:18 UTC
[VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
+1
Cheers,
-Gilles
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Ryan Olshan <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 6/29/05, Mohammed Mudassir <mm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> On 6/29/05, Rahul Singh ( Anant ) <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > On 6/29/05, Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > +1
> > >
> > > I didn't experience any Castle dependency issue with this.
> > >
> > > Roberto
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > Cheers,
> > > > -Gilles
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Rahul Singh
> > CEO, Anant
> > rahul.singh@anant.us
> >
>
>
> --
>
> Mudassir
>
> San Jose,CA
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever
> dies.
>
> - The Shawshank Redemption (Movie)
>
--
Thank you,
Ryan Olshan
<asp:WebProgrammer />
TeraNet Systems
http://www.teranetsystems.com
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Mohammed Mudassir <mm...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 6/29/05, Rahul Singh ( Anant ) <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On 6/29/05, Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > I didn't experience any Castle dependency issue with this.
> >
> > Roberto
> >
> >
> > On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > > -Gilles
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Rahul Singh
> CEO, Anant
> rahul.singh@anant.us
>
--
Mudassir
San Jose,CA
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things, and no good thing ever dies.
- The Shawshank Redemption (Movie)
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by "Rahul Singh ( Anant )" <an...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 6/29/05, Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I didn't experience any Castle dependency issue with this.
>
> Roberto
>
>
> On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Gilles
>
>
--
Rahul Singh
CEO, Anant
rahul.singh@anant.us
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com>.
+1
The Castle stuff looks fine in Reflector.
--- Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I didn't experience any Castle dependency issue with this.
>
> Roberto
>
> On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> > Cheers,
> > -Gilles
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1
I didn't experience any Castle dependency issue with this.
Roberto
On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
> Cheers,
> -Gilles
>
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Ron Grabowski <ro...@yahoo.com>.
TimeSpanTypeHandler.cs isn't implemented yet:
public override object GetValueByName(ResultProperty mapping,
IDataReader dataReader)
{
//return GetValueByIndex(dataReader.GetOrdinal(columnName),
dataReader);
return "ToDo";
}
This might be an ok implementation assuming GetDateTime doesn't return
null:
return dataReader.GetDateTime(index).TimeOfDay;
I wonder if there's a more direct way of getting a TimeSpan without
having to first convert it to a DateTime:
public override object ValueOf(Type type, string s)
{
return Convert.ToDateTime(s).TimeOfDay;
}
public override object GetDataBaseValue(object outputValue, Type
parameterType )
{
return Convert.ToDateTime(outputValue).TimeOfDay;
}
That should probably be fixed before the release. Do we get to start
over again :-)
--- Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I ran it through the guantlet again this morning, all tests are
> green,
> and no one bugged me about a conflict, so +1.
>
> -T.
>
> On 6/30/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It's has been fixed.
>
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
I ran it through the guantlet again this morning, all tests are green,
and no one bugged me about a conflict, so +1.
-T.
On 6/30/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It's has been fixed.
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com>.
It's has been fixed.
On 6/30/05, Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> When I tried to install these, I had some trouble with the Castle
> dependency again, though I got around it by reference our Castle DLL
> directly
>
> It it just me, or has the dependency issue been fixed?
>
> -Ted.
>
> On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > +1
> >
> > Cheers,
> > -Gilles
>
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Ted Husted <te...@gmail.com>.
When I tried to install these, I had some trouble with the Castle
dependency again, though I got around it by reference our Castle DLL
directly
It it just me, or has the dependency issue been fixed?
-Ted.
On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> -Gilles
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Roberto R <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1
I didn't experience any Castle dependency issue with this.
Roberto
On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
> Cheers,
> -Gilles
>
Re: [VOTE] upgrade the DataMapper 1.2.1/ DataAccess 1.6.1 to General Availibilty
Posted by Chad Humphries <ch...@gmail.com>.
+1
On 6/29/05, Gilles Bayon <ib...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Cheers,
> -Gilles