You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tinkerpop.apache.org by "stephen mallette (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/02/09 20:29:41 UTC

[jira] [Created] (TINKERPOP-1625) Improvements to has() related steps

stephen mallette created TINKERPOP-1625:
-------------------------------------------

             Summary: Improvements to has() related steps
                 Key: TINKERPOP-1625
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TINKERPOP-1625
             Project: TinkerPop
          Issue Type: Improvement
          Components: process
    Affects Versions: 3.2.3
            Reporter: stephen mallette


A number of issues related to {{has()}} prefixes steps:

* Review {{has()}} for missing tests. {{hasKey}} for example has no tests
* Improve documentation for {{has}} in general. The short descriptions are confusing and don't always make usage clear. 
** Example: "hasKey(keys...): Remove the traverser if its property does not have any of the keys." - not clear that this means {{g.V().properties().hasKey("name")}} and not {{g.V().properties().hasKey("location")}}
* Ensure consistency in the parameter names
** Example: {{hasKeys(keys...)}} is referenced in the docs, but in the code it is: {{hasKey(label, otherLabels)}}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)