Re: [RFC] A libsvn_wc properties optimisation

[solo turn <so...@gmail.com>]

On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 01:11:49 +0100, Branko Čibej <br...@xbc.nu> wrote:
> Barry Scott wrote:
> > I think I've seen that a rewrite of WC is on the cards. Given how hard
> > you say this sort of change is going be to implement the sooner the
> > rewrite the better.
> 
> Sure. Although I do think locking, ACLs and merge tracking are more
> important. An SQL backend is probably less important.
i fully agree.
a "svn destroy" or a "svn destroy -r1:500" are also very important
imo, as it facilitates maintenance, backup and restore. currently it
is rather complicated to get rid of old versions. and we do not want
to apply for http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?SoftwareMasterpiece where a 20
year old change history is an advantage ;)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org