You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@unomi.apache.org by "Don Hinshaw (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2017/10/26 15:20:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (UNOMI-132) ProfileServiceImpl mergeProfiles for nested profile properties

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-132?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Don Hinshaw updated UNOMI-132:
------------------------------
    Description: 
When merging profiles unomi does not look for profile properties that are nested.

   "properties": {
        "nbOfVisits": 1,
        "lastVisit": "2017-10-25T20:04:49Z",
        "group": {
            "user_ids": {
                "site_1": "123_user_id"
            }
        },
        "firstVisit": "2017-10-25T20:04:49Z",
    }

When this profile gets merged, unomi looks for the properties on line 458 in ProfileServiceImpl.

allProfileProperties.addAll(profile.getProperties().keySet());

The keySet() will only include "group", not the values nested inside.  So we cannot define a mergeRule for the values inside.

How can we merge two profiles with different user_id values?

Current work around is to use group_user-id_site-1 : "123_user_id" instead of the nested property.

Any thoughts or is this a new use case?

Thanks,
Donnie

  was:
When merging profiles unomi does not look for profile properties that are nested.

{{    "properties": {
        "nbOfVisits": 1,
        "lastVisit": "2017-10-25T20:04:49Z",
        "group": {
            "user_ids": {
                "site_1": "123_user_id"
            }
        },
        "firstVisit": "2017-10-25T20:04:49Z",
    }t}}

When this profile gets merged, unomi looks for the properties on line 458 in ProfileServiceImpl.

allProfileProperties.addAll(profile.getProperties().keySet());

The keySet() will only include "group", not the values nested inside.  So we cannot define a mergeRule for the values inside.

How can we merge two profiles with different user_id values?

Current work around is to use group_user-id_site-1 : "123_user_id" instead of the nested property.

Any thoughts or is this a new use case?

Thanks,
Donnie


> ProfileServiceImpl mergeProfiles for nested profile properties
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UNOMI-132
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UNOMI-132
>             Project: Apache Unomi
>          Issue Type: Wish
>            Reporter: Don Hinshaw
>            Priority: Minor
>
> When merging profiles unomi does not look for profile properties that are nested.
>    "properties": {
>         "nbOfVisits": 1,
>         "lastVisit": "2017-10-25T20:04:49Z",
>         "group": {
>             "user_ids": {
>                 "site_1": "123_user_id"
>             }
>         },
>         "firstVisit": "2017-10-25T20:04:49Z",
>     }
> When this profile gets merged, unomi looks for the properties on line 458 in ProfileServiceImpl.
> allProfileProperties.addAll(profile.getProperties().keySet());
> The keySet() will only include "group", not the values nested inside.  So we cannot define a mergeRule for the values inside.
> How can we merge two profiles with different user_id values?
> Current work around is to use group_user-id_site-1 : "123_user_id" instead of the nested property.
> Any thoughts or is this a new use case?
> Thanks,
> Donnie



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.4.14#64029)