You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@ofbiz.apache.org by "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/02/28 15:57:00 UTC
[jira] [Created] (OFBIZ-10843) Replace SHA-1 by SHA-512
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-10843:
---------------------------------------
Summary: Replace SHA-1 by SHA-512
Key: OFBIZ-10843
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-10843
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: framework
Affects Versions: Trunk
Reporter: Jacques Le Roux
While working on OFBIZ-10427, I noticed that HashCrypt::cryptBytes uses "SHA" as default hashType (aka algorithm in JDK jargon)
HashCrypt::cryptBytes is notably used by GenericEntity::toString
But if I refer to the "current" documentation https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/guides/security/StandardNames.html#MessageDigest
I can't find any "SHA" algorithm. Even in https://docs.oracle.com/javase/1.5.0/docs/guide/security/CryptoSpec.html#AppA which I guess corresponds to the date of HashCrypt code.
Trying MessageDigest.getInstance("SHA") returns a MessageDigest with a digestSpi.algorithm value of "SHA-1"
Curious I tried HashCrypt.cryptBytes(null, null, "test".getBytes()) and got
$SHA$ggtMOpnFTWdKd$18wkxkG5J0G37Flewu8XSmLQ72U
So it works, but obviously use SHA1 and we know SHA1 is insecure.
So I suggest to replace in HashCrypt::cryptBytes the default by "SHA-512"
After having a look at both code and related articles (below). I found tt's not as easy as I thought, because we need to take into account legacy and transition for users.
https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/48289/how-secure-is-sha1-what-are-the-chances-of-a-real-exploit
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3173616/the-sha1-hash-function-is-now-completely-unsafe.html
https://www.infoworld.com/article/2990831/sha-1-hashing-algorithm-could-succumb-to-75k-attack-researchers-say.html
https://security.googleblog.com/2017/02/announcing-first-sha1-collision.html?m=1
I conclude that it's something we should do without lagging but not ASAP.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)