Re: svn commit: r1230120 - /openejb/trunk/openejb/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/config/DeploymentLoader.java

[David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>]

On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:14 AM, rmannibucau@apache.org wrote:

> Author: rmannibucau
> Date: Wed Jan 11 16:14:34 2012
> New Revision: 1230120
> 
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1230120&view=rev
> Log:
> normally everything should be fine simply scanning pu with the old way

Out of curiosity, what exactly was different about the old way and the new way that was removed?

I see the new way that was removed involved a baseUrl of some kind.  What was that for?


-David

Re: svn commit: r1230120 - /openejb/trunk/openejb/container/openejb-core/src/main/java/org/apache/openejb/config/DeploymentLoader.java

[Romain Manni-Bucau <rm...@gmail.com>]

At a moment while working on tck pu was not parsed in webapp as it was
mounths ago.

I added code to take into account webapp pu since i thought it was the
issue but it seems the issue was we were no more scanning pu in webapp and
its libs.

- Romain

Le 11 janv. 2012 18:45, "David Blevins" <da...@gmail.com> a écrit :

>
> On Jan 11, 2012, at 8:14 AM, rmannibucau@apache.org wrote:
>
> > Author: rmannibucau
> > Date: Wed Jan 11 16:14:34 2012
> > New Revision: 1230120
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1230120&view=rev
> > Log:
> > normally everything should be fine simply scanning pu with the old way
>
> Out of curiosity, what exactly was different about the old way and the new
> way that was removed?
>
> I see the new way that was removed involved a baseUrl of some kind.  What
> was that for?
>
>
> -David
>
>