[GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>]

Again we are into a stand still, can you all please post to the list. 

Can we have a integrated hello world tutorial? 

Suresh

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>]

Thanks Danushka for summarizing these. I think, we really need to get the kinks out and get the projects working end to end. 

Suresh

On Aug 31, 2013, at 11:49 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We basically discussed two issues in the previous hangout.
> 
> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> 
> 2. Receiving messages in XML format (instead of in JSON as expected) from the Registry API.
> 
> The plan was to address these two issues and try a simple end-to-end example using the Web UI.
> 
> I think it is better if we first sort out these two issues and have the sample usecase running before thinking ahead.
> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka 

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I won't be able to attend today hangout. It would be great if we can
arrange next hangout at around 8.30am IST.

Thanks,
Shameera.


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we have
> it at 11.30 IST today?
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>
>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so
>> that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer
>> be there with the update URL's
>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk
>> to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>
>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>
>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Join in at
>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>>>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>>>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>>>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>>>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>>>>>>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>>>>>>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>>>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>>>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>>>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>>>>>>>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>>>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>>>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a
>>>>>>>> look at it too.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>>>>>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work
>>>>>>>> at all.
>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>>>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>>>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>>>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>>>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>>>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>>>>>> not be easy.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>
>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

Sure. I will be there.


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 9:49 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys
>
> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note
>> that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US
>> on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST)
>> either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
>>> right now.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>>>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>>>>>> little more in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can
>>>>>>> we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>>>>>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running
>>>>>>>> by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>>>>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>>>>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>>>>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good
>>>>>>>>>>>> to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like
>>>>>>>>>>>> to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours
>>>>>>>>>>>> from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Subho
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

I missed the hangout too. What was the conclusion?.

Basically what is the way forward in terms of getting the Web UI to work?.
I think we need to plan the next steps.

Thanks,
Danushka


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
> Can somebody summarize what was discussed in the hangout ?
> I could not attend it.
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Shameera/subho/All
>>
>> Please join the hangout
>>
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/fe5577f8e75d014d88ed59c865a6915a5c054425?pqs=1&hl=en&authuser=0
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> Could we have a hangout before we submit the documents
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Did the hangout happened?
>>>>
>>>> We need to wrap up the gsoc projects today. Can all of you please
>>>> provide wiki documents on whats accomplished and what you cannot do. Please
>>>> refer back to the proposals.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Suresh
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > I'm travelling to a workshop this weekend, so I will be busy during
>>>> the day CST. So 10-11.30 am IST works well for me.
>>>> >
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Subho.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi Guys,
>>>> >
>>>> > Please suggest the possible time when we all are available for
>>>> discussion.
>>>> > I am fine with any time between 10 - 11.30 a.m IST or after 9 PM IST.
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >
>>>> > >>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>>> > >>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>>> > >>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
>>>> > publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue
>>>> using
>>>> > curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq).
>>>> >
>>>> > I  also looked at
>>>> > https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
>>>> > for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.
>>>> >
>>>> > But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried
>>>> consuming message from a existing queue, This also does not work .
>>>> >
>>>> > Need to discuss this .
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Vijayendra
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the
>>>> open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for
>>>> these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in
>>>> the context of open source contributions.
>>>> >
>>>> > Suresh
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Hi All,
>>>> > >
>>>> > > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the
>>>> things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
>>>> > >
>>>> > > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master
>>>> project
>>>> > > * Test cases for all the code
>>>> > > * Documentation
>>>> > > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Suresh
>>>> > >
>>>> > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a
>>>> summary of what happened at the hangout...
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Subho.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <
>>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi All
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Vijayendra
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Can we have it shortly?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Danushka
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi Subho,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
>>>> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
>>>> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all
>>>> of you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
>>>> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> In general, the problems we are having -
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>>>> working on)
>>>> > >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>>>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>>>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>>>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me,
>>>> if it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this
>>>> issue?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML
>>>> format. Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data?
>>>> (I have applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> I have changed the request URL to
>>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this
>>>> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in
>>>> json format use
>>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
>>>> if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have
>>>> handle this inside the registryAPI.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >> Shameera.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>>> > >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>>> > >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
>>>> fixed --
>>>> > >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and
>>>> adding it to the tomcat war.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Subho
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi Guys,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be
>>>> great if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can
>>>> follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in
>>>> integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have
>>>> already opened an another thread for it.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >> Shameera.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi Guys
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Join the hangout at :
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> +1.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Danushka
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi Guys
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m
>>>> ist ?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Guys,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please
>>>> kindly note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera
>>>> is in the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e.
>>>> ~10:30 pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works
>>>> for everyone.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >> Danushka
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can
>>>> have it right now.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have
>>>> it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>>>> Wednesday.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>> > >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe
>>>> a little more in advance.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi all
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can
>>>> we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>> hangout.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>> > >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>> > >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>> > >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>> > >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running
>>>> by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >> Danushka
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Join in at
>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi all,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> +1 for the approach.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Regards
>>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi all,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >> Shameera
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>>>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>>>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Thanks,
>>>> > >> Danushka
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >> Hi All,
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>>>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>> in last weeks.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> Suresh
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>> > >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>> > >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a
>>>> look at it too.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work
>>>> at all.
>>>> > >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>> not be easy.
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>>
>>>> > >>> --
>>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>>> > >>> Subho
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Subho
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Subho
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Subho
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >>
>>>> > >> --
>>>> > >> Cheers,
>>>> > >> Subho
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Subho
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Subho
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com>]

Hi
Can somebody summarize what was discussed in the hangout ?
I could not attend it.

Regards
Vijayendra


On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Shameera/subho/All
>
> Please join the hangout
>
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/fe5577f8e75d014d88ed59c865a6915a5c054425?pqs=1&hl=en&authuser=0
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Could we have a hangout before we submit the documents
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Did the hangout happened?
>>>
>>> We need to wrap up the gsoc projects today. Can all of you please
>>> provide wiki documents on whats accomplished and what you cannot do. Please
>>> refer back to the proposals.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>> On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > I'm travelling to a workshop this weekend, so I will be busy during
>>> the day CST. So 10-11.30 am IST works well for me.
>>> >
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Subho.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Guys,
>>> >
>>> > Please suggest the possible time when we all are available for
>>> discussion.
>>> > I am fine with any time between 10 - 11.30 a.m IST or after 9 PM IST.
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > >>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>> > >>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>> > >>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
>>> > publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue
>>> using
>>> > curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq).
>>> >
>>> > I  also looked at
>>> > https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
>>> > for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.
>>> >
>>> > But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried
>>> consuming message from a existing queue, This also does not work .
>>> >
>>> > Need to discuss this .
>>> >
>>> > Regards
>>> > Vijayendra
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the
>>> open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for
>>> these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in
>>> the context of open source contributions.
>>> >
>>> > Suresh
>>> >
>>> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > > Hi All,
>>> > >
>>> > > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the
>>> things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
>>> > >
>>> > > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master
>>> project
>>> > > * Test cases for all the code
>>> > > * Documentation
>>> > > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
>>> > >
>>> > > Suresh
>>> > >
>>> > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >
>>> > >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a
>>> summary of what happened at the hangout...
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Subho.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <
>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi All
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Vijayendra
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Can we have it shortly?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Danushka
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi Subho,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
>>> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
>>> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all
>>> of you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
>>> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> In general, the problems we are having -
>>> > >>
>>> > >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>>> working on)
>>> > >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me,
>>> if it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this
>>> issue?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML
>>> format. Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data?
>>> (I have applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I have changed the request URL to
>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this
>>> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in
>>> json format use
>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
>>> if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have
>>> handle this inside the registryAPI.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Shameera.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>> > >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>> > >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>> > >>
>>> > >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
>>> fixed --
>>> > >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and
>>> adding it to the tomcat war.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Subho
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi Guys,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great
>>> if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can
>>> follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in
>>> integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have
>>> already opened an another thread for it.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Shameera.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi Guys
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Join the hangout at :
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> +1.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Danushka
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi Guys
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist
>>> ?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Guys,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please
>>> kindly note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera
>>> is in the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e.
>>> ~10:30 pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works
>>> for everyone.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Danushka
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have
>>> it right now.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have
>>> it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>>> Wednesday.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>> > >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe
>>> a little more in advance.
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi all
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can
>>> we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>> > >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>> > >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>> > >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>> > >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>> > >>
>>> > >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running
>>> by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Danushka
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Join in at
>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi all,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +1 for the approach.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +1 for 11 PM.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Regards
>>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi all,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Shameera
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Thanks,
>>> > >> Danushka
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >> Hi All,
>>> > >>
>>> > >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>> in last weeks.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> Suresh
>>> > >>
>>> > >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>> > >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>> > >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>> > >>
>>> > >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > >>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look
>>> at it too.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work
>>> at all.
>>> > >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>> not be easy.
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>>
>>> > >>> --
>>> > >>> Cheers,
>>> > >>> Subho
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Subho
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Subho
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Subho
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Best Regards,
>>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> > >>
>>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >>
>>> > >> --
>>> > >> Cheers,
>>> > >> Subho
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Subho
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>>
>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Shameera/subho/All

Please join the hangout
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/fe5577f8e75d014d88ed59c865a6915a5c054425?pqs=1&hl=en&authuser=0

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 6:13 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> Could we have a hangout before we submit the documents
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Did the hangout happened?
>>
>> We need to wrap up the gsoc projects today. Can all of you please provide
>> wiki documents on whats accomplished and what you cannot do. Please refer
>> back to the proposals.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Suresh
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > I'm travelling to a workshop this weekend, so I will be busy during the
>> day CST. So 10-11.30 am IST works well for me.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> > Subho.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi Guys,
>> >
>> > Please suggest the possible time when we all are available for
>> discussion.
>> > I am fine with any time between 10 - 11.30 a.m IST or after 9 PM IST.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > >>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>> > >>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>> > >>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>> >
>> >
>> > I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
>> > publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue
>> using
>> > curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq).
>> >
>> > I  also looked at
>> > https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
>> > for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.
>> >
>> > But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried
>> consuming message from a existing queue, This also does not work .
>> >
>> > Need to discuss this .
>> >
>> > Regards
>> > Vijayendra
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the
>> open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for
>> these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in
>> the context of open source contributions.
>> >
>> > Suresh
>> >
>> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hi All,
>> > >
>> > > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the
>> things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
>> > >
>> > > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master
>> project
>> > > * Test cases for all the code
>> > > * Documentation
>> > > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
>> > >
>> > > Suresh
>> > >
>> > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a
>> summary of what happened at the hangout...
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Subho.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <
>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi All
>> > >>
>> > >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Vijayendra
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Can we have it shortly?
>> > >>
>> > >> Danushka
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi Subho,
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
>> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
>> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>> > >>
>> > >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all
>> of you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
>> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> In general, the problems we are having -
>> > >>
>> > >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>> working on)
>> > >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>> > >>
>> > >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if
>> it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
>> > >>
>> > >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML
>> format. Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data?
>> (I have applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>> > >>
>> > >> I have changed the request URL to
>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this
>> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in
>> json format use
>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
>> if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have
>> handle this inside the registryAPI.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Shameera.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>> > >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>> > >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>> > >>
>> > >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
>> fixed --
>> > >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and
>> adding it to the tomcat war.
>> > >>
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Subho
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi Guys,
>> > >>
>> > >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great
>> if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can
>> follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in
>> integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have
>> already opened an another thread for it.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Shameera.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi Guys
>> > >>
>> > >> Join the hangout at :
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> +1.
>> > >>
>> > >> Danushka
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi Guys
>> > >>
>> > >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Guys,
>> > >>
>> > >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>> everyone.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Danushka
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi
>> > >>
>> > >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have
>> it right now.
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have
>> it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>> Wednesday.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi
>> > >>
>> > >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>> > >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>> little more in advance.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi all
>> > >>
>> > >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can
>> we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>> > >>
>> > >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>> > >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>> > >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>> > >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera
>> so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no
>> longer be there with the update URL's
>> > >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>> > >>
>> > >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running
>> by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>> > >>
>> > >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Danushka
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Join in at
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >>
>> > >> +1 for the approach.
>> > >>
>> > >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>> > >>
>> > >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>> > >>
>> > >> +1 for 11 PM.
>> > >>
>> > >> Regards
>> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> > >> Contact - 9581417330
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> Hi all,
>> > >>
>> > >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>> > >>
>> > >> Hope to meet you all in there.
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Shameera
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>> > >>
>> > >> Thanks,
>> > >> Danushka
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> > >> Hi All,
>> > >>
>> > >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>> > >>
>> > >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>> in last weeks.
>> > >>
>> > >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>> > >>
>> > >> Suresh
>> > >>
>> > >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>> > >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>> > >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look
>> at it too.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work
>> at all.
>> > >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>> this method was unsuccessful.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>> Angular webapp.
>> > >>>
>> > >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>> not be easy.
>> > >>>
>> > >>>
>> > >>> --
>> > >>> Cheers,
>> > >>> Subho
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Best Regards,
>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> > >>
>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Best Regards,
>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> > >>
>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Subho
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Subho
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Best Regards,
>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> > >>
>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Subho
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Best Regards,
>> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> > >>
>> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Cheers,
>> > >> Subho
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Subho
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Subho
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

Hi,
Could we have a hangout before we submit the documents


On Mon, Sep 23, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Did the hangout happened?
>
> We need to wrap up the gsoc projects today. Can all of you please provide
> wiki documents on whats accomplished and what you cannot do. Please refer
> back to the proposals.
>
> Cheers,
> Suresh
>
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm travelling to a workshop this weekend, so I will be busy during the
> day CST. So 10-11.30 am IST works well for me.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Subho.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi Guys,
> >
> > Please suggest the possible time when we all are available for
> discussion.
> > I am fine with any time between 10 - 11.30 a.m IST or after 9 PM IST.
> >
> > Regards
> > Sanchit Aggarwal
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > >>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> > >>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> > >>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
> >
> >
> > I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
> > publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue
> using
> > curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq).
> >
> > I  also looked at
> > https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
> > for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.
> >
> > But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried
> consuming message from a existing queue, This also does not work .
> >
> > Need to discuss this .
> >
> > Regards
> > Vijayendra
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the
> open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for
> these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in
> the context of open source contributions.
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the
> things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
> > >
> > > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master
> project
> > > * Test cases for all the code
> > > * Documentation
> > > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
> > >
> > > Suresh
> > >
> > > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a
> summary of what happened at the hangout...
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Subho.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <
> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi All
> > >>
> > >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Vijayendra
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Can we have it shortly?
> > >>
> > >> Danushka
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi Subho,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
> > >>
> > >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of
> you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> In general, the problems we are having -
> > >>
> > >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
> working on)
> > >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
> > >>
> > >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if
> it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
> > >>
> > >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format.
> Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
> > >>
> > >> I have changed the request URL to
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this
> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in
> json format use
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
> if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have
> handle this inside the registryAPI.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Shameera.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> > >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> > >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
> > >>
> > >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
> fixed --
> > >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and
> adding it to the tomcat war.
> > >>
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Subho
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi Guys,
> > >>
> > >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great
> if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can
> follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in
> integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have
> already opened an another thread for it.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Shameera.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi Guys
> > >>
> > >> Join the hangout at :
> > >>
> > >>
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> > >> Contact - 9581417330
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> +1.
> > >>
> > >> Danushka
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi Guys
> > >>
> > >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> > >> Contact - 9581417330
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Guys,
> > >>
> > >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
> everyone.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Danushka
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have
> it right now.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> > >> Contact - 9581417330
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi
> > >>
> > >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> > >> Contact - 9581417330
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
> > >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
> little more in advance.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi all
> > >>
> > >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
> have it at 11.30 IST today?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> > >> Contact - 9581417330
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
> > >>
> > >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
> > >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
> > >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
> > >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera
> so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no
> longer be there with the update URL's
> > >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
> > >>
> > >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
> > >>
> > >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Danushka
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Join in at
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> +1 for the approach.
> > >>
> > >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
> > >>
> > >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
> > >>
> > >> +1 for 11 PM.
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> > >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> > >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> > >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> > >> Contact - 9581417330
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> Hi all,
> > >>
> > >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
> > >>
> > >> Hope to meet you all in there.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Shameera
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Danushka
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> > >> Hi All,
> > >>
> > >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
> > >>
> > >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see
> a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
> weeks.
> > >>
> > >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
> > >>
> > >> Suresh
> > >>
> > >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> > >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> > >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
> > >>
> > >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> > >>>
> > >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> > >>>
> > >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look
> at it too.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> > >>>
> > >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
> all.
> > >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
> this method was unsuccessful.
> > >>>
> > >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
> Angular webapp.
> > >>>
> > >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
> not be easy.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Cheers,
> > >>> Subho
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> > >>
> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> > >>
> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Subho
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Subho
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> > >>
> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Subho
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Best Regards,
> > >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> > >>
> > >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> > >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Cheers,
> > >> Subho
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Subho
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>]

Did the hangout happened? 

We need to wrap up the gsoc projects today. Can all of you please provide wiki documents on whats accomplished and what you cannot do. Please refer back to the proposals. 

Cheers,
Suresh

On Sep 20, 2013, at 11:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm travelling to a workshop this weekend, so I will be busy during the day CST. So 10-11.30 am IST works well for me.
> 
> Cheers,
> Subho.
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> 
> Please suggest the possible time when we all are available for discussion.
> I am fine with any time between 10 - 11.30 a.m IST or after 9 PM IST.
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> >>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> >>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> >>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
> 
> 
> I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
> publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue using 
> curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq). 
> 
> I  also looked at 
> https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
> for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.
> 
> But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried consuming message from a existing queue, This also does not work .
> 
> Need to discuss this . 
> 
> Regards
> Vijayendra
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in the context of open source contributions.
> 
> Suresh
> 
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
> >
> > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master project
> > * Test cases for all the code
> > * Documentation
> > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a summary of what happened at the hangout...
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Vijayendra
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Can we have it shortly?
> >>
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Subho,
> >>
> >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
> >>
> >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
> >>
> >>
> >> In general, the problems we are having -
> >>
> >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are working on)
> >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served, but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
> >>
> >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
> >>
> >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
> >>
> >> I have changed the request URL to "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in json format use "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true", if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have handle this inside the registryAPI.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameera.
> >>
> >>
> >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
> >>
> >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed --
> >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding it to the tomcat war.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened an another thread for it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameera.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Guys
> >>
> >> Join the hangout at :
> >>
> >> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Guys
> >>
> >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it right now.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
> >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a little more in advance.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
> >>
> >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
> >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
> >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
> >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer be there with the update URL's
> >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
> >>
> >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
> >>
> >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Join in at https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> +1 for the approach.
> >>
> >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
> >>
> >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
> >>
> >> +1 for 11 PM.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
> >>
> >> Hope to meet you all in there.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameera
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
> >>
> >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last weeks.
> >>
> >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
> >>
> >> Suresh
> >>
> >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
> >>
> >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> >>>
> >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> >>>
> >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it too.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> >>>
> >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
> >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
> >>>
> >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular webapp.
> >>>
> >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will not be easy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

I'm travelling to a workshop this weekend, so I will be busy during the day
CST. So 10-11.30 am IST works well for me.

Cheers,
Subho.


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Please suggest the possible time when we all are available for discussion.
> I am fine with any time between 10 - 11.30 a.m IST or after 9 PM IST.
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> >>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>> >>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>> >>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>
>>
>> I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
>> publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue
>> using
>> curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq).
>>
>> I  also looked at
>> https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
>> for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.
>>
>> But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried
>> consuming message from a existing queue, This also does not work .
>>
>> Need to discuss this .
>>
>> Regards
>> Vijayendra
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the
>>> open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for
>>> these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in
>>> the context of open source contributions.
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>> On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi All,
>>> >
>>> > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the
>>> things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
>>> >
>>> > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master
>>> project
>>> > * Test cases for all the code
>>> > * Documentation
>>> > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
>>> >
>>> > Suresh
>>> >
>>> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a
>>> summary of what happened at the hangout...
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Subho.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <
>>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi All
>>> >>
>>> >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Vijayendra
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Can we have it shortly?
>>> >>
>>> >> Danushka
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi Subho,
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
>>> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
>>> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>>> >>
>>> >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of
>>> you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
>>> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> In general, the problems we are having -
>>> >>
>>> >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>>> working on)
>>> >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>>> >>
>>> >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if
>>> it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
>>> >>
>>> >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format.
>>> Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
>>> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>>> >>
>>> >> I have changed the request URL to
>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this
>>> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in
>>> json format use
>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
>>> if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have
>>> handle this inside the registryAPI.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Shameera.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>> >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>> >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>> >>
>>> >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
>>> fixed --
>>> >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and
>>> adding it to the tomcat war.
>>> >>
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Subho
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi Guys,
>>> >>
>>> >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great
>>> if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can
>>> follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in
>>> integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have
>>> already opened an another thread for it.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Shameera.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi Guys
>>> >>
>>> >> Join the hangout at :
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> +1.
>>> >>
>>> >> Danushka
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi Guys
>>> >>
>>> >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Guys,
>>> >>
>>> >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>>> everyone.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Danushka
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi
>>> >>
>>> >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have
>>> it right now.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi
>>> >>
>>> >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>> >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>>> little more in advance.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi all
>>> >>
>>> >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
>>> have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>> >>
>>> >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>> >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>> >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>> >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera
>>> so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no
>>> longer be there with the update URL's
>>> >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>> >>
>>> >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>> >>
>>> >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Danushka
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Join in at
>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 for the approach.
>>> >>
>>> >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>> >>
>>> >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 for 11 PM.
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards
>>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> Hi all,
>>> >>
>>> >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>> >>
>>> >> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Shameera
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>> >>
>>> >> Thanks,
>>> >> Danushka
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>> >> Hi All,
>>> >>
>>> >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>> >>
>>> >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see
>>> a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>> weeks.
>>> >>
>>> >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>> >>
>>> >> Suresh
>>> >>
>>> >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>> >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>> >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>> >>
>>> >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look
>>> at it too.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>> >>>
>>> >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>> all.
>>> >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>> Angular webapp.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>> not be easy.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Cheers,
>>> >>> Subho
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> >>
>>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> >>
>>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Subho
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Subho
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> >>
>>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Subho
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Best Regards,
>>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>> >>
>>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> Cheers,
>>> >> Subho
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Guys,

Please suggest the possible time when we all are available for discussion.
I am fine with any time between 10 - 11.30 a.m IST or after 9 PM IST.

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal



On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> >>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> >>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> >>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>
>
> I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
> publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue using
> curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq).
>
> I  also looked at
> https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
> for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.
>
> But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried
> consuming message from a existing queue, This also does not work .
>
> Need to discuss this .
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the
>> open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for
>> these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in
>> the context of open source contributions.
>>
>> Suresh
>>
>> On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the
>> things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
>> >
>> > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master
>> project
>> > * Test cases for all the code
>> > * Documentation
>> > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
>> >
>> > Suresh
>> >
>> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a
>> summary of what happened at the hangout...
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Subho.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <
>> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi All
>> >>
>> >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Vijayendra
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Can we have it shortly?
>> >>
>> >> Danushka
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Subho,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
>> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
>> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>> >>
>> >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of
>> you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
>> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> In general, the problems we are having -
>> >>
>> >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>> working on)
>> >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>> >>
>> >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if
>> it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
>> >>
>> >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format.
>> Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
>> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>> >>
>> >> I have changed the request URL to
>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this
>> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in
>> json format use
>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
>> if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have
>> handle this inside the registryAPI.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Shameera.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>> >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>> >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>> >>
>> >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
>> fixed --
>> >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding
>> it to the tomcat war.
>> >>
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Subho
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Guys,
>> >>
>> >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if
>> one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow
>> up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration.
>> At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened
>> an another thread for it.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Shameera.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Guys
>> >>
>> >> Join the hangout at :
>> >>
>> >>
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> +1.
>> >>
>> >> Danushka
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi Guys
>> >>
>> >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Guys,
>> >>
>> >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>> everyone.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Danushka
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
>> right now.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi
>> >>
>> >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>> >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>> little more in advance.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi all
>> >>
>> >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
>> have it at 11.30 IST today?
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>> >>
>> >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>> >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>> >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>> >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera
>> so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no
>> longer be there with the update URL's
>> >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>> >>
>> >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>> >>
>> >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Danushka
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Join in at
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> +1 for the approach.
>> >>
>> >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>> >>
>> >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>> >>
>> >> +1 for 11 PM.
>> >>
>> >> Regards
>> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> >> Contact - 9581417330
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi all,
>> >>
>> >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>> >>
>> >> Hope to meet you all in there.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Shameera
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Danushka
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
>> wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>> >>
>> >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see
>> a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>> weeks.
>> >>
>> >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>> >>
>> >> Suresh
>> >>
>> >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>> >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>> >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>> >>
>> >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>> >>>
>> >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>> >>>
>> >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>> it too.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>> >>>
>> >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>> all.
>> >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>> this method was unsuccessful.
>> >>>
>> >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>> Angular webapp.
>> >>>
>> >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>> not be easy.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> Cheers,
>> >>> Subho
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> >>
>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> >>
>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Subho
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Subho
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> >>
>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Subho
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Best Regards,
>> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> >>
>> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Cheers,
>> >> Subho
>> >
>>
>>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

>>(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS


I was able to use management API and able to create a queue.
publish a message to it. Then fetch the message and delete the queue using
curl and rabbitmqadmin (utility provided by rabbitmq).

I  also looked at
https://github.com/smallfish/rabbitmq-http
for HTTP API for  RabbitMQ.

But it has some issues. I was not able to create a queue. I tried consuming
message from a existing queue, This also does not work .

Need to discuss this .

Regards
Vijayendra


On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the open
> source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for
> these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in
> the context of open source contributions.
>
> Suresh
>
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the
> things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
> >
> > * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master
> project
> > * Test cases for all the code
> > * Documentation
> > * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal
> >
> > Suresh
> >
> > On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a
> summary of what happened at the hangout...
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <
> vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi All
> >>
> >> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Vijayendra
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Can we have it shortly?
> >>
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Subho,
> >>
> >> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
> >>
> >> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of
> you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
> >>
> >>
> >> In general, the problems we are having -
> >>
> >> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
> working on)
> >> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
> >>
> >> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it
> is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
> >>
> >> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format.
> Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
> >>
> >> I have changed the request URL to
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this
> will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in
> json format use
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true",
> if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have
> handle this inside the registryAPI.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameera.
> >>
> >>
> >> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> >> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> >> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
> >>
> >> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
> fixed --
> >> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding
> it to the tomcat war.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Guys,
> >>
> >> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if
> one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow
> up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration.
> At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened
> an another thread for it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameera.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Guys
> >>
> >> Join the hangout at :
> >>
> >>
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi Guys
> >>
> >> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Guys,
> >>
> >> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
> everyone.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
> right now.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> Sorry I couldn't make it.
> >> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
> little more in advance.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all
> >>
> >> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
> have it at 11.30 IST today?
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
> >>
> >> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
> >> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
> >> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
> >> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so
> that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer
> be there with the update URL's
> >> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk
> to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
> >>
> >> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
> >>
> >> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Join in at
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> +1 for the approach.
> >>
> >> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world"
> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution
> and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running
> workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
> >>
> >> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
> >>
> >> +1 for 11 PM.
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Sanchit Aggarwal
> >> MS Research (Computer Science)
> >> Center for Visual Information Technology
> >> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> >> Contact - 9581417330
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have
> a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
> i have some issue in being present after that time.
> >>
> >> Hope to meet you all in there.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameera
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Danushka
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
> >>
> >> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
> weeks.
> >>
> >> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
> >>
> >> Suresh
> >>
> >> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> >> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> >> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
> >>
> >> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> >>>
> >>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> >>>
> >>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
> it too.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> >>>
> >>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
> all.
> >>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
> this method was unsuccessful.
> >>>
> >>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
> Angular webapp.
> >>>
> >>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
> not be easy.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Cheers,
> >>> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Best Regards,
> >> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> >>
> >> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> >> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cheers,
> >> Subho
> >
>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>]

Please note that GSoC is geared towards teaching contributions to the open source, and not a coding challenge. Thats why it is very essential for these projects to demonstrate they learned something from this program in the context of open source contributions. 

Suresh

On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:09 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
> 
> We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).
> 
> * Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master project
> * Test cases for all the code
> * Documentation 
> * Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal 
> 
> Suresh
> 
> On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a summary of what happened at the hangout...
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Subho. 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi All
>> 
>> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Vijayendra
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Can we have it shortly?
>> 
>> Danushka
>> 
>> 
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Subho, 
>> 
>> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline. 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>> 
>> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.  
>> 
>> 
>> In general, the problems we are having -
>> 
>> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are working on)
>> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served, but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>> 
>> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
>> 
>> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>> 
>> I have changed the request URL to "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in json format use "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true", if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have handle this inside the registryAPI. 
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Shameera.
>> 
>> 
>> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>> 
>> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed --
>> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding it to the tomcat war.
>> 
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Guys, 
>> 
>> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened an another thread for it. 
>> 
>> Thanks, 
>> Shameera.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Guys
>> 
>> Join the hangout at :
>> 
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> +1.
>> 
>> Danushka
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi Guys 
>> 
>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Guys,
>> 
>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi 
>> 
>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it right now.
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi 
>> 
>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a little more in advance.
>> 
>> 
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all
>> 
>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>> 
>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer be there with the update URL's
>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>> 
>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>> 
>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Join in at https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> +1 for the approach.
>> 
>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>> 
>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>> 
>> +1 for 11 PM. 
>> 
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time. 
>> 
>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka 
>> 
>> 
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>> 
>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last weeks.
>> 
>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>> 
>> Suresh
>> 
>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>> 
>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>> 
>>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>> 
>>> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it too.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>> 
>>> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
>>> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>> 
>>> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular webapp.
>>> 
>>> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will not be easy.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Subho
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> 
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> 
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> 
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>> 
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
> 

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>]

Hi All,

We have three more days and following GSOC guidelines here are the things need to be done for all projects (including Viknes's).

* Have a working integrated hello world from end to end for master project
* Test cases for all the code
* Documentation 
* Description on what the code did and how it addressed the proposal 

Suresh

On Sep 20, 2013, at 9:02 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a summary of what happened at the hangout...
> 
> Cheers,
> Subho. 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <vi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All
> 
> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
> 
> Regards
> Vijayendra
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Can we have it shortly?
> 
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Subho, 
> 
> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline. 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
> 
> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.  
> 
> 
> In general, the problems we are having -
> 
> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are working on)
> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served, but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>  
> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
> 
> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
> 
> I have changed the request URL to "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?isJson=true" this will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML in json format use "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&isJson=true", if you are using my registry api you don't need to change any think i have handle this inside the registryAPI. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Shameera.
>  
> 
> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
> 
> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed --
> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding it to the tomcat war.
> 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys, 
> 
> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration. At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened an another thread for it. 
> 
> Thanks, 
> Shameera.
>  
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys
> 
> Join the hangout at :
> 
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1.
> 
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Guys 
> 
> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Guys,
> 
> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.
> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi 
> 
> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it right now.
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi 
> 
> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry I couldn't make it.
> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a little more in advance.
> 
> 
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all
> 
> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
> 
> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer be there with the update URL's
> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
> 
> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
> 
> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Join in at https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> +1 for the approach.
> 
> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
> 
> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
> 
> +1 for 11 PM. 
> 
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time. 
> 
> Hope to meet you all in there.
> 
> Thanks,
> Shameera
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
> 
> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last weeks.
> 
> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
> 
> Suresh
> 
> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
> 
> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> >
> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> >
> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it too.
> >
> >
> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> >
> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
> >
> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular webapp.
> >
> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will not be easy.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Subho
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
> 
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

I dont think I will be able to make it today. Maybe you can send a summary
of what happened at the hangout...

Cheers,
Subho.


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Vijayendra sdm <vi...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi All
>
> Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Can we have it shortly?
>>
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Subho,
>>>
>>> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
>>>> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
>>>> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of
>>> you guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
>>> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> In general, the problems we are having -
>>>>
>>>> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>>>> working on)
>>>> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>>>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>>>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>>>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it
>>> is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
>>>
>>> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is
>>>> there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
>>>> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have changed the request URL to
>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?*isJson=true*"
>>> this will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML
>>> in json format use
>>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&
>>> *isJson=true*", if you are using my registry api you don't need to
>>> change any think i have handle this inside the registryAPI.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shameera.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>>> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>>> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>>>
>>>> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are
>>>> fixed --
>>>> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding
>>>> it to the tomcat war.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Subho
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if
>>>>> one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow
>>>>> up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration.
>>>>> At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened
>>>>> an another thread for it.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Shameera.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Join the hangout at :
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist
>>>>>>>> ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please
>>>>>>>>> kindly note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera
>>>>>>>>> is in the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e.
>>>>>>>>> ~10:30 pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works
>>>>>>>>> for everyone.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can
>>>>>>>>>> have it right now.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead
>>>>>>>>>>> have it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>>>>>>>>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable
>>>>>>>>>>>> time .
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout
>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a little more in advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FE can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> at a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can take a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> box in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> re-write most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maintaining two of these will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>
>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Subho
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Vijayendra sdm <vi...@gmail.com>]

Hi All

Can we have hangout today at 10.30 PM IST ?

Regards
Vijayendra


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 11:07 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> Can we have it shortly?
>
> Danushka
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Subho,
>>
>> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some
>>> issues with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have
>>> another hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>>>
>>
>> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of you
>> guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
>> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>>
>>
>>
>>> In general, the problems we are having -
>>>
>>> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>>> working on)
>>> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>>>
>>
>> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it
>> is possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
>>
>> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is
>>> there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
>>> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>>>
>>
>> I have changed the request URL to
>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?*isJson=true*"
>> this will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML
>> in json format use
>> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&
>> *isJson=true*", if you are using my registry api you don't need to
>> change any think i have handle this inside the registryAPI.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>>> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>>> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>>
>>> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed
>>> --
>>> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding
>>> it to the tomcat war.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Subho
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Guys,
>>>>
>>>> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if
>>>> one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow
>>>> up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration.
>>>> At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened
>>>> an another thread for it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shameera.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>>
>>>>> Join the hangout at :
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please
>>>>>>>> kindly note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera
>>>>>>>> is in the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e.
>>>>>>>> ~10:30 pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works
>>>>>>>> for everyone.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can
>>>>>>>>> have it right now.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead
>>>>>>>>>> have it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>>>>>>>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time
>>>>>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout
>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a little more in advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> evening.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FE can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can take a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> box in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of these will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>
>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Subho
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

Can we have it shortly?

Danushka


On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi Subho,
>
> Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some issues
>> with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have another
>> hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>>
>
> It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of you
> guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
> conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.
>
>
>
>> In general, the problems we are having -
>>
>> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are
>> working on)
>> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
>> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
>> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
>> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>>
>
> Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it is
> possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?
>
> -- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is
>> there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
>> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>>
>
> I have changed the request URL to
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?*isJson=true*"
> this will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML
> in json format use
> "/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&
> *isJson=true*", if you are using my registry api you don't need to change
> any think i have handle this inside the registryAPI.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>>
>> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
>> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
>> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>>
>> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed
>> --
>> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding it
>> to the tomcat war.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guys,
>>>
>>> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if
>>> one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow
>>> up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration.
>>> At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened
>>> an another thread for it.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shameera.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>
>>>> Join the hangout at :
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1.
>>>>>
>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>>>>>>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>>>>>>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>>>>>>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>>>>>>> everyone.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have
>>>>>>>> it right now.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have
>>>>>>>>> it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>>>>>>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout
>>>>>>>>>>> maybe a little more in advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes
>>>>>>>>>>>> can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hangout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE
>>>>>>>>>>>>> can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample
>>>>>>>>>>>>> running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> box in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of these will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>]

Hi Subho,

Thanks you very much for summary, please see my comment inline.


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some issues
> with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have another
> hangout tomorrow at the same time.
>

It is very difficult to join a hangout at that time for me, as all of you
guys ok with that time, go on and please send a small note about
conclusions and issues addressed in this hangout session.



> In general, the problems we are having -
>
> (Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are working
> on)
> -- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
> corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
> is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
> but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
>

Hi subho i again checked provenance registry and it works for me, if it is
possible lets have an call at around 9.00 PM (EDT) resolve this issue?

-- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is
> there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
> applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)
>

I have changed the request URL to
"/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflows?*isJson=true*"
this will return all workflows in json format. to get a Workflow GraphXML
in json format use
"/airavata/services/registry/userwfregistry/get/workflowgraph?workflowName=SSS&&
*isJson=true*", if you are using my registry api you don't need to change
any think i have handle this inside the registryAPI.

Thanks,
Shameera.


>
> (Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
> -- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
> -- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS
>
> General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed --
> -- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding it
> to the tomcat war.
>
> Cheers,
> Subho
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if
>> one of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow
>> up the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration.
>> At the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened
>> an another thread for it.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guys
>>>
>>> Join the hangout at :
>>>
>>>
>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1.
>>>>
>>>> Danushka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>>
>>>>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>>>>>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>>>>>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>>>>>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>>>>>> everyone.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have
>>>>>>> it right now.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have
>>>>>>>> it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>>>>>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout
>>>>>>>>>> maybe a little more in advance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes
>>>>>>>>>>> can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>>>>>>>>>> hangout.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE
>>>>>>>>>>>> can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample
>>>>>>>>>>>> running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> box in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of these will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Subho
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

Hi Shameera,
We couldnt really discuss a lot in todays hangout, there were some issues
with getting the mics working properly. We are planning to have another
hangout tomorrow at the same time.

In general, the problems we are having -

(Problems relating to registry api and what you, Sanchit and I are working
on)
-- The airavata server is spitting out 405 errors in the links
corresponding to the provenance registry. But I can't seem to pinpoint what
is causing the error. The server logs say that a 405 request was served,
but they don't have anything about why there was an error.
-- The XWF files are still coming down to the WebUI in an XML format. Is
there a separate API end-point for the JSON version of the data? (I have
applied all your patches to my version of the trunk)

(Problems related to what Vijayendra is working on)
-- Usage of HTTP API for RabbitMQ in the frontend
-- Porting Vijayendra's code to AngularJS

General problems that need to be looked at once the ones above are fixed --
-- Adding a phase in the maven build to pull the GSoC files and adding it
to the tomcat war.

Cheers,
Subho


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 4:39 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi Guys,
>
> Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if one
> of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow up
> the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration. At
> the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened an
> another thread for it.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> Join the hangout at :
>>
>>
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1.
>>>
>>> Danushka
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Guys
>>>>
>>>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Guys,
>>>>>
>>>>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>>>>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>>>>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>>>>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>>>>> everyone.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have
>>>>>> it right now.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have
>>>>>>> it Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on
>>>>>>> Wednesday.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe
>>>>>>>>> a little more in advance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes
>>>>>>>>>> can we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>>>>>>>>> hangout.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE
>>>>>>>>>>> can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample
>>>>>>>>>>> running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of these will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>]

Hi Guys,

Extremely sorry i couldn't make it for this call, It would be great if one
of you can put summary or conclusion of the hangout then i can follow up
the process and help you guys to resolve any issues come in integration. At
the moment i am working on Context header thing, i have already opened an
another thread for it.

Thanks,
Shameera.



On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 1:30 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys
>
> Join the hangout at :
>
>
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1.
>>
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Guys
>>>
>>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Guys,
>>>>
>>>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>>>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>>>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>>>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>>>> everyone.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Danushka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
>>>>> right now.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>>>>>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <subs.zero@gmail.com
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe
>>>>>>>> a little more in advance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can
>>>>>>>>> we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>>>>>>>> hangout.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE
>>>>>>>>>> can talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample
>>>>>>>>>> running by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end
>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> two of these will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Guys

Join the hangout at :

https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/f255b37ce77d79200162b13872b0078818f66770?pqs=1&authuser=0&hl=en

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> +1.
>
> Danushka
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Guys
>>
>> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Guys,
>>>
>>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly
>>> note that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in
>>> the US on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30
>>> pm IST) either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for
>>> everyone.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danushka
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
>>>> right now.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>>>>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>>>>>>> little more in advance.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can
>>>>>>>> we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's
>>>>>>>>> hangout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>>>>>>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running
>>>>>>>>> by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end
>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hello world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once
>>>>>>>>>>>> we have a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes
>>>>>>>>>>>> post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be
>>>>>>>>>>>>> good to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would
>>>>>>>>>>>>> like to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3
>>>>>>>>>>>>> hours from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Subho
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

+1.

Danushka


On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Guys
>
> Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note
>> that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US
>> on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST)
>> either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
>>> right now.
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>>>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi
>>>>>
>>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>>>>>> little more in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can
>>>>>>> we have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by
>>>>>>>> Shameera so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout
>>>>>>>> should no longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>>>>>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running
>>>>>>>> by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>>>>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>>>>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>>>>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good
>>>>>>>>>>>> to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like
>>>>>>>>>>>> to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours
>>>>>>>>>>>> from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide
>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> seem commits in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> Subho
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Subho
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi Guys

Are We having a hangout today ? Is it fine to have it at 11 p.m ist ?

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note
> that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US
> on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST)
> either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
>> right now.
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>>>>> little more in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
>>>>>> have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera
>>>>>>> so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no
>>>>>>> longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>>>>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running
>>>>>>> by early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>>>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>>>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>>>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good
>>>>>>>>>>> to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with
>>>>>>>>>>> the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like
>>>>>>>>>>> to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours
>>>>>>>>>>> from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide
>>>>>>>>>>>> on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <
>>>>>>>>>>>> smarru@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> subs.zero@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take
>>>>>>>>>>>>> a look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>>> work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes
>>>>>>>>>>>>> down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most
>>>>>>>>>>>>> of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Subho
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Subho
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

Guys,

Lets have it on Wednesday as I am in office right now. Please kindly note
that daytime (IST) does not work for me. Also I think Shameera is in the US
on a customer engagement. Lets make it our usual time (i.e. ~10:30 pm IST)
either today or tomorrow. Lets check whether that time works for everyone.

Thanks,
Danushka


On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
> right now.
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
>> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>>>> little more in advance.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all
>>>>>
>>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
>>>>> have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera
>>>>>> so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no
>>>>>> longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>>>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>>>>>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good
>>>>>>>>>> to have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with
>>>>>>>>>> the master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like
>>>>>>>>>> to request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours
>>>>>>>>>> from now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide
>>>>>>>>>>> on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I
>>>>>>>>>>> don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that
>>>>>>>>>>> demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may
>>>>>>>>>>> have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with
>>>>>>>>>>> edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it
>>>>>>>>>>> perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe
>>>>>>>>>>> we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <smarru@apache.org
>>>>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated?
>>>>>>>>>>>> We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>>>>>>>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a
>>>>>>>>>>>> look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>>> work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes
>>>>>>>>>>>> down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the
>>>>>>>>>>>> whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of
>>>>>>>>>>>> the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Subho
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>>
>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi

I am fine with any time. If your are available now then we can have it
right now.

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 7:34 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
> Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>>> little more in advance.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all
>>>>
>>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
>>>> have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera
>>>>> so that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no
>>>>> longer be there with the update URL's
>>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can
>>>>> talk to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>>
>>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>>>>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>>
>>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Join in at
>>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>>>>>>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>>>>>>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>>>>>>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>>>>>>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>>>>>>>>>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>>>>>>>>>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>>>>>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>>>>>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>>>>>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>>>>>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>>>>>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated?
>>>>>>>>>>> We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>>>>>>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>>>>>>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a
>>>>>>>>>>> look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> work at all.
>>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update
>>>>>>>>>>> the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes
>>>>>>>>>>> down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the
>>>>>>>>>>> whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of
>>>>>>>>>>> the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Cheers,
>>> Subho
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Subho
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

I will be travelling on Tuesday night (IST), could we instead have it
Tuesday morning 9-10 am IST (which is in a couple of hours) or on Wednesday.


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 3:28 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Sorry I couldn't make it.
>> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
>> little more in advance.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all
>>>
>>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
>>> have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>>>
>>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so
>>>> that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer
>>>> be there with the update URL's
>>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk
>>>> to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>>
>>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>>>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>>
>>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Danushka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Join in at
>>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>>>>>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>>>>>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>>>>>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>>>>>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>>>>>>>>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>>>>>>>>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>>>>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>>>>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>>>>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>>>>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>>>>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>>>>>>>>>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>>>>>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>>>>>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a
>>>>>>>>>> look at it too.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't
>>>>>>>>>> work at all.
>>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update
>>>>>>>>>> the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes
>>>>>>>>>> down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the
>>>>>>>>>> whole this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of
>>>>>>>>>> the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cheers,
>> Subho
>>
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi

Lets have it tomorrow for sure. Please mention the suitable time .

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry I couldn't make it.
> Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a
> little more in advance.
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all
>>
>> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we
>> have it at 11.30 IST today?
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>>
>>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so
>>> that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer
>>> be there with the update URL's
>>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk
>>> to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>>
>>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>>
>>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danushka
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Join in at
>>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards
>>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>>>>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>>>>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>>>>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>>>>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>>>>>>>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>>>>>>>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>>>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>>>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>>>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>>>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>>>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for
>>>>>>>>> Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters
>>>>>>>>> projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I
>>>>>>>>> think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>>>>>>>>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>>>>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>>>>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a
>>>>>>>>> look at it too.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code
>>>>>>>>> Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't
>>>>>>>>> work at all.
>>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>>>>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>>>>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>>>>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of
>>>>>>>>> the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a
>>>>>>>>> problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these
>>>>>>>>> will not be easy.
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>
>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Subho
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

Sorry I couldn't make it.
Next time maybe we can have the announcement for the hangout maybe a little
more in advance.


On Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:54 AM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all
>
> Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we have
> it at 11.30 IST today?
>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>>
>> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
>> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
>> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
>> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so
>> that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer
>> be there with the update URL's
>> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk
>> to RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>>
>> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
>> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>>
>> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Join in at
>>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>>
>>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello
>>>>> world" workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect
>>>>> solution and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have
>>>>> a running workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>>>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>>>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>>>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>>>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on
>>>>>>> the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't
>>>>>>> think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>>>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>>>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>>>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>>>>>>>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time
>>>>>>>> which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to
>>>>>>>> the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline
>>>>>>>> closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code
>>>>>>>> documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has
>>>>>>>> to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a
>>>>>>>> look at it too.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>>>>>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work
>>>>>>>> at all.
>>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>>>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>>>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>>>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>>>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>>>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>>>>>> not be easy.
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>
>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi all

Are we having a hangout to discuss about the progress ? if yes can we have
it at 11.30 IST today?

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 12:23 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.
>
> 1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
> 2. Subho is working on the Registry API
> 3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
> 4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so
> that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer
> be there with the update URL's
> 5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk to
> RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server
>
> *** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by
> early next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.
>
> Guys please add if I have missed out anything.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Join in at
>> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>>
>>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world"
>>>> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution
>>>> and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running
>>>> workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>>
>>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to
>>>>> have a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the
>>>>> master project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to
>>>>> request to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from
>>>>> now, as i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>>
>>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Shameera
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>>>>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>>>>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We
>>>>>>> see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all
>>>>>>> patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits
>>>>>>> in last weeks.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>>>>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>>>>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>>>>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>>>>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>>>>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look
>>>>>>> at it too.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>>>>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work
>>>>>>> at all.
>>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help
>>>>>>> implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box
>>>>>>> in an Angular webapp.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>>>>> not be easy.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> > --
>>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>>
>>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

This is a quick update on what was discussed during today's hangout.

1. Angular JS services are likely to be done by Sunday evening.
2. Subho is working on the Registry API
3. Sanchit is going to start with the Workflow API
4. The REST API resource URL's have already been updated by Shameera so
that the 405 error that was discussed in the last hangout should no longer
be there with the update URL's
5. Danushka is to look at the RabbitMQ REST API so that the FE can talk to
RabbitMQ server directly instead of going through Node.js server

*** Hopefully we are supposed to have an end-to-end sample running by early
next week. We will have the next hangout on Sunday night.

Guys please add if I have missed out anything.

Thanks,
Danushka


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> Join in at
> https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
>> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> +1 for the approach.
>>>
>>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world"
>>> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution
>>> and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running
>>> workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>>
>>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>>
>>
>> +1 for 11 PM.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>>> Contact - 9581417330
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have
>>>> a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
>>>> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
>>>> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
>>>> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>>
>>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Shameera
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>>>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>>>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Danushka
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see
>>>>>> a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>>>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>>>>> weeks.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>>>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>>>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>>>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>>>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>>>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look
>>>>>> at it too.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>>>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work
>>>>>> at all.
>>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>>>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>>>>> Angular webapp.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>>>> not be easy.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > --
>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>>
>>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

Join in at
https://plus.google.com/hangouts/_/3dcdb4ca707eaf3ec76396701aa219c0c9897775?authuser=0&hl=en


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:

>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
> sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> +1 for the approach.
>>
>> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world"
>> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution
>> and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running
>> workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>>
>> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>>
>
> +1 for 11 PM.
>
>
>>
>> Regards
>> Sanchit Aggarwal
>> MS Research (Computer Science)
>> Center for Visual Information Technology
>> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
>> Contact - 9581417330
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have
>>> a hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
>>> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
>>> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
>>> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>>
>>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shameera
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Danushka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>>
>>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see
>>>>> a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>>>> weeks.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look
>>>>> at it too.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera
>>>>> has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been
>>>>> unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>>>> all.
>>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>>>> Angular webapp.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>>> not be easy.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > --
>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>> > Subho
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>]

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Sanchit Aggarwal <
sanchitagarwal108@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> +1 for the approach.
>
> I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world"
> workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution
> and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running
> workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.
>
> Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?
>

+1 for 11 PM.


>
> Regards
> Sanchit Aggarwal
> MS Research (Computer Science)
> Center for Visual Information Technology
> IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
> Contact - 9581417330
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a
>> hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
>> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
>> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
>> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>
>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danushka
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>
>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
>>>> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>>> weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Suresh
>>>>
>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>> >
>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>> >
>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>>>> it too.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>>>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>>>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>> >
>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>>> all.
>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>> >
>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>>> Angular webapp.
>>>> >
>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>> not be easy.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Subho
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi all,

+1 for the approach.

I also think it would be good if we can have a end-to-end "Hello world"
workflow. For the time being lets not concentrate on the perfect solution
and focus on bringing the different pieces together, once we have a running
workflow we can attend to  imperfection and loopholes post GSOC.

Can we all meet around 11 P.M. IST ?

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 8:35 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a
> hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>
> Hope to meet you all in there.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way
>> forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it
>> has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility
>> of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of
>> room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would
>> give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort
>> put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further
>> from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC
>>> projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a
>>> collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>
>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
>>> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>> weeks.
>>>
>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>> >
>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>> >
>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>>> it too.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>> >
>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>> all.
>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>> >
>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>> Angular webapp.
>>> >
>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>> not be easy.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Subho
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Vijayendra sdm <vi...@gmail.com>]

I am fine with it

Regards
Vijayendra


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 9:48 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
> I have a class till 1pm CST. Which I guess is like 11pm IST. Could we talk
> around that time (I will join by 1.15 CST)?
>
> Cheers,
> Subho.
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a
>> hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
>> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
>> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
>> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>>
>> Hope to meet you all in there.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the
>>> way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think
>>> it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates
>>> feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have
>>> loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme
>>> conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when
>>> some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can
>>> revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danushka
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata
>>>> GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects
>>>> and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>>
>>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
>>>> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>>> weeks.
>>>>
>>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>>
>>>> Suresh
>>>>
>>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>>
>>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>> >
>>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>>> >
>>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>>>> it too.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>>>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>>>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>>> >
>>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>>> all.
>>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>>> >
>>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>>> Angular webapp.
>>>> >
>>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>>> not be easy.
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > Cheers,
>>>> > Subho
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Subho
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

Hi,
I have a class till 1pm CST. Which I guess is like 11pm IST. Could we talk
around that time (I will join by 1.15 CST)?

Cheers,
Subho.


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> +1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a
> hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
> project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
> to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
> i have some issue in being present after that time.
>
> Hope to meet you all in there.
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way
>> forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it
>> has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility
>> of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of
>> room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would
>> give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort
>> put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further
>> from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC
>>> projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a
>>> collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>>
>>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
>>> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>>> weeks.
>>>
>>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>>
>>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>> >
>>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>> >
>>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>>> it too.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>>> >
>>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>>> all.
>>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>>> this method was unsuccessful.
>>> >
>>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>>> Angular webapp.
>>> >
>>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>>> not be easy.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Cheers,
>>> > Subho
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>



-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>]

Hi all,

+1 for Danushka's  comments above. I too think it would be good to have a
hangout to sort out and discuss the way onwards from here with the master
project.  If we are going to have the handout today i would like to request
to have it before 12.00 AM IST which is within around 3 hours from now, as
i have some issue in being present after that time.

Hope to meet you all in there.

Thanks,
Shameera


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way
> forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it
> has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility
> of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of
> room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would
> give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort
> put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further
> from there easily (I mean post GSoC).
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC
>> projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a
>> collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
>> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
>> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
>> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
>> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
>> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
>> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>>
>> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
>> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
>> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
>> weeks.
>>
>> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which
>> works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
>> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
>> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
>> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
>> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>>
>> Suresh
>>
>> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
>> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
>> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>>
>> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>> >
>> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>> >
>> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at
>> it too.
>> >
>> >
>> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
>> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
>> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
>> >
>> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at
>> all.
>> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the
>> Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to
>> whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole
>> this method was unsuccessful.
>> >
>> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement)
>> what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an
>> Angular webapp.
>> >
>> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
>> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
>> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
>> not be easy.
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Cheers,
>> > Subho
>>
>>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>]

On Sep 13, 2013, at 2:42 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further from there easily (I mean post GSoC).

+ 1. By no means its expected all of you will magically solve all the challenging technical issues in 2 weeks. But it needs to get to place where the code has to work with all known limitations and bring out next TODO's. 

Suresh

> 
> Thanks,
> Danushka 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
> 
> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last weeks.
> 
> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
> 
> Suresh
> 
> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
> 
> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> >
> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> >
> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it too.
> >
> >
> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> >
> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
> >
> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular webapp.
> >
> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will not be easy.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Subho
> 
> 

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

I think the objective of tonight's hangout should be to decide on the way
forward to get a simple workflow running end-to-end ASAP. I don't think it
has to be a perfect solution, but something that demonstrates feasibility
of  the underlying architecture. Presumably it may have loopholes, a lot of
room for optimization, may not work with edge/extreme conditions, but would
give the impression that we can make it perfect when some additional effort
put in. If we can get there, I believe we can revisit and take it further
from there easily (I mean post GSoC).

Thanks,
Danushka


On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 6:30 AM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC
> projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a
> collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think
> collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got
> deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to
> have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really
> unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it?
> Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the
> integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox.
>
> Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a
> small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches
> in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last
> weeks.
>
> Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works
> for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm
> pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely,
> the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test
> coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard
> to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements.
>
> Suresh
>
> [1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
> [2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
> [3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013
>
> On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> >
> > It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
> >
> > What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it
> too.
> >
> >
> > I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
> written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
> at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> >
> > 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
> > 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular
> models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether
> a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this
> method was unsuccessful.
> >
> > It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what
> else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular
> webapp.
> >
> > The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the
> registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem
> that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will
> not be easy.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Cheers,
> > Subho
>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>]

Hi All,

If you recollect we had some key goals and pre-requite for Airavata GSoC projects [1]. The key one is to have an integrated Masters projects and a collective team responsibility to have a working project. I think collectively the integration really fell through the cracks and got deferred until the end. Inspite of the mid-term warning that we need to have a big picture and how each components will play together, we really unable to get a hello world end to end tutorial. Can we please get to it? Its really hard to judge individual contributions. More over if the integration does not come together, all of the code will RIP in sandbox. 

Can you guys sprint the last mile and get the code integrated? We see a small spike in discussion and nothing beyond that. Can we get all patches in? In contrary to typical GSoC contributions, haven't seem commits in last weeks. 

Can you all have a hangout tonight (India/SL) Friday at a time which works for all and summery clearly a day to day roadmap from now to the firm pencil down data of Septmeber 23rd [3]? Please see the timeline closely, the suggested pencil down date is 16th and a full code documentation, test coverage and all should be done by 23rd. Every one has to really work hard to pass the finals with all gsoc requirements. 

Suresh

[1] - http://markmail.org/message/rmotieckqj3a4xxv
[2] - http://markmail.org/thread/rw2qzpukheow5aiy
[3] - http://www.google-melange.com/gsoc/events/google/gsoc2013

On Sep 1, 2013, at 5:17 PM, Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
> 
> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.  
> 
> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it too.
> 
> 
> I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -
> 
> 1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
> 2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this method was unsuccessful.
> 
> It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular webapp.
> 
> The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the registry API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem that we will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will not be easy. 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Subho Banerjee <su...@gmail.com>]

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>  1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>>
>>
>> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>>
>>
>
> What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it
> too.
>


I am trying to figure out if we can somehow use the code Shameera has
written directly in the angular service. Till now I have been unsuccessful
at getting this to work. I have tried two techniques -

1. Use Shameera's object in an Angular service. This doesn't work at all.
2. Edit Shameera's code to add the $promise values to update the Angular
models. This seems to work intermittently, I think it comes down to whether
a certain set of events fire in the right order. So on the whole this
method was unsuccessful.

It will be great if you guys can suggest (and maybe help implement) what
else we can do to make Shameera's code work out of the box in an Angular
webapp.

The last option we have would be to probably re-write most of the registry
API JS client into an Angular service. Now this creates a problem that we
will end up having two JS clients. Maintaining two of these will not be
easy.


-- 
Cheers,
Subho

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>>
>
> It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.
>
>

What exactly are we trying to solve here?. Maybe I can take a look at it
too.


> 2. Receiving messages in XML format (instead of in JSON as expected) from
>> the Registry API.
>>
>
> Please create JIRAs and assign me or drop a mail to dev  with steps to
> reproduce these issues, Then I would able to provide fixes.
>

Lets try to fix these issues early this week so that we will have something
running by next weekend, before a hangout.

Thanks,
Danushka

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>]

Hi
Dhanushka Thanks for summarize the issues.,

On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 9:19 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> We basically discussed two issues in the previous hangout.
>
> 1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.
>

It would be great if Sanchit and Subho could help me on this.



>
> 2. Receiving messages in XML format (instead of in JSON as expected) from
> the Registry API.
>

Please create JIRAs and assign me or drop a mail to dev  with steps to
reproduce these issues, Then I would able to provide fixes.


Thanks,
Shameera.


> The plan was to address these two issues and try a simple end-to-end
> example using the Web UI.
>
> I think it is better if we first sort out these two issues and have the
> sample usecase running before thinking ahead.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>



-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

We basically discussed two issues in the previous hangout.

1. Using the Registry API inside AngularJS.

2. Receiving messages in XML format (instead of in JSON as expected) from
the Registry API.

The plan was to address these two issues and try a simple end-to-end
example using the Web UI.

I think it is better if we first sort out these two issues and have the
sample usecase running before thinking ahead.

Thanks,
Danushka

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Sanchit Aggarwal <sa...@gmail.com>]

Hi
Are we having a hangout today ?

Regards
Sanchit Aggarwal
MS Research (Computer Science)
Center for Visual Information Technology
IIIT Hyderabad, Gachibowli
Contact - 9581417330



On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Vijayendra Grampurohit <
vijayendra.sdm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi
>
> I am in.
>
> Regards
> Vijayendra
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Guys,
>>
>> Are we in a position to do an end-to-end scenario?. Are we OK with the
>> Registry API?.
>>
>> We should anyway have a hangout tomorrow.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
>> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> If anyone encounter any issue related to registryAPI or struggling on
>>> that please drop a mail to airavata dev list as then I can work on that, (
>>> Also as we have to wrap registryAPI and write angular service, in this case
>>> it would be great if i can have a helping hand on starting that change :) )
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Shameera.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Suresh,
>>>>
>>>> We need to finish the pending work before starting on the tutorial. I
>>>> am not sure where we stand in terms of the work plan (to have a simple
>>>> workflow running end-to-end) as we discussed in our last hangout.
>>>>
>>>> Guys any update on that?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Danushka
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Again we are into a stand still, can you all please post to the list.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can we have a integrated hello world tutorial?
>>>>>
>>>>> Suresh
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards,
>>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>>
>>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>>
>>
>>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Vijayendra Grampurohit <vi...@gmail.com>]

Hi

I am in.

Regards
Vijayendra


On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 10:57 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> Guys,
>
> Are we in a position to do an end-to-end scenario?. Are we OK with the
> Registry API?.
>
> We should anyway have a hangout tomorrow.
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <
> shameerainfo@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> If anyone encounter any issue related to registryAPI or struggling on
>> that please drop a mail to airavata dev list as then I can work on that, (
>> Also as we have to wrap registryAPI and write angular service, in this case
>> it would be great if i can have a helping hand on starting that change :) )
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Shameera.
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
>> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Suresh,
>>>
>>> We need to finish the pending work before starting on the tutorial. I am
>>> not sure where we stand in terms of the work plan (to have a simple
>>> workflow running end-to-end) as we discussed in our last hangout.
>>>
>>> Guys any update on that?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Danushka
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Again we are into a stand still, can you all please post to the list.
>>>>
>>>> Can we have a integrated hello world tutorial?
>>>>
>>>> Suresh
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Best Regards,
>> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>>
>> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
>> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>>
>
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

Guys,

Are we in a position to do an end-to-end scenario?. Are we OK with the
Registry API?.

We should anyway have a hangout tomorrow.

Thanks,
Danushka


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Shameera Rathnayaka <shameerainfo@gmail.com
> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> If anyone encounter any issue related to registryAPI or struggling on that
> please drop a mail to airavata dev list as then I can work on that, ( Also
> as we have to wrap registryAPI and write angular service, in this case it
> would be great if i can have a helping hand on starting that change :) )
>
> Thanks,
> Shameera.
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
> danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Suresh,
>>
>> We need to finish the pending work before starting on the tutorial. I am
>> not sure where we stand in terms of the work plan (to have a simple
>> workflow running end-to-end) as we discussed in our last hangout.
>>
>> Guys any update on that?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danushka
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Again we are into a stand still, can you all please post to the list.
>>>
>>> Can we have a integrated hello world tutorial?
>>>
>>> Suresh
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Shameera Rathnayaka.
>
> email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
> Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/
>

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Shameera Rathnayaka <sh...@gmail.com>]

Hi All,

If anyone encounter any issue related to registryAPI or struggling on that
please drop a mail to airavata dev list as then I can work on that, ( Also
as we have to wrap registryAPI and write angular service, in this case it
would be great if i can have a helping hand on starting that change :) )

Thanks,
Shameera.


On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Danushka Menikkumbura <
danushka.menikkumbura@gmail.com> wrote:

> Suresh,
>
> We need to finish the pending work before starting on the tutorial. I am
> not sure where we stand in terms of the work plan (to have a simple
> workflow running end-to-end) as we discussed in our last hangout.
>
> Guys any update on that?
>
> Thanks,
> Danushka
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> Again we are into a stand still, can you all please post to the list.
>>
>> Can we have a integrated hello world tutorial?
>>
>> Suresh
>>
>
>


-- 
Best Regards,
Shameera Rathnayaka.

email: shameera AT apache.org , shameerainfo AT gmail.com
Blog : http://shameerarathnayaka.blogspot.com/

Re: [GSOC] Status of integrated tutorial

[Danushka Menikkumbura <da...@gmail.com>]

Suresh,

We need to finish the pending work before starting on the tutorial. I am
not sure where we stand in terms of the work plan (to have a simple
workflow running end-to-end) as we discussed in our last hangout.

Guys any update on that?

Thanks,
Danushka


On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Suresh Marru <sm...@apache.org> wrote:

> Again we are into a stand still, can you all please post to the list.
>
> Can we have a integrated hello world tutorial?
>
> Suresh
>