Re: [STATUS] 1.2.1

[Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com>]

> Everyone happy with rolling 1.2.1 final?  Let's not hold it off for the
> hostname debate, we can clear that up for certain in 1.3.  My schedule is
> kind of busy, I won't be able to roll until about 8pm PDT.  I'll also be
> offline for the weekend, leaving tomorrow morning.

If you need me to step in to roll this, let me know.

> Oh btw, blush, I've never used pgp so someone else is going to have to
> sign it. 

What did we decide to do on this signing business?



> Available:
> 
>     * Marc's Very strange bug in mod_dir
> 	<Pi...@valis.worldgate.com>
> 
>     * Marc's [PATCH] PR#something  SCO and -K noinline
> 	<Pi...@alive.znep.com>

I can't test these SCO changes, but would vote +1 on the intent.

Re: [STATUS] 1.2.1

[Brian Behlendorf <br...@organic.com>]

At 10:49 AM 7/3/97 +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
>Here's what I proposed, so far with no response whatsoever:
[for signing code]

I think this is fine, including signing only the .tar.

	Brian


--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--
"Why not?" - TL                brian@organic.com - hyperreal.org - apache.org