You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ant.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/07/13 15:34:39 UTC
[Bug 1213] - Link compiler's used by Javac and EJBJar tasks
http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1213
*** shadow/1213 Sun May 20 17:24:33 2001
--- shadow/1213.tmp.2835 Fri Jul 13 06:34:39 2001
***************
*** 1,19 ****
! Bug#: 1213
! Product: Ant
! Version: 1.3
! Platform: PC
! OS/Version:
! Status: NEW
! Resolution:
! Severity: Enhancement
! Priority:
! Component: Optional Tasks
! AssignedTo: ant-dev@jakarta.apache.org
! ReportedBy: david.ventimiglia@msdw.com
! URL:
! Cc:
! Summary: Link compiler's used by Javac and EJBJar tasks
!
The Javac task makes use of the build.compiler property to determine the
compiler it should use (javac, jikes, etc.). The EJBJar task uses an attribute
in the nested Weblogic element to do the same thing (the attribute
--- 1,19 ----
! +============================================================================+
! | Link compiler's used by Javac and EJBJar tasks |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | Bug #: 1213 Product: Ant |
! | Status: NEW Version: 1.3 |
! | Resolution: Platform: PC |
! | Severity: Enhancement OS/Version: All |
! | Priority: High Component: Optional Tasks |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | Assigned To: conor@cortexebusiness.com.au |
! | Reported By: david.ventimiglia@msdw.com |
! | CC list: Cc: |
! +----------------------------------------------------------------------------+
! | URL: |
! +============================================================================+
! | DESCRIPTION |
The Javac task makes use of the build.compiler property to determine the
compiler it should use (javac, jikes, etc.). The EJBJar task uses an attribute
in the nested Weblogic element to do the same thing (the attribute
***************
*** 32,35 ****
Not a high priority, since I'm sure there's a workaround right now.
Thanks,
! David
--- 32,35 ----
Not a high priority, since I'm sure there's a workaround right now.
Thanks,
! David