You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Hoss Man (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2007/06/05 23:59:26 UTC
[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-908) MANIFEST.MF cleanup (main jar and luci
customizations)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Hoss Man updated LUCENE-908:
----------------------------
Description:
there are several problems with the MANIFEST.MF file used in the core jar, and some inconsistencies in th luci jar:
Lucli's build.xml has an own "jar" target and does not use the jar target from common-build.xml. The result
is that the MANIFEST.MF file is not consistent and the META-INF dir does not contain LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT.
Is there a reason why lucli behaves different in this regard? If not I think we should fix this.
was:
Is there a particular reason why lucli has it's own MANIFEST.MF file? Lucli's build.xml
has an own "jar" target and does not use the jar target from common-build.xml. The result
is that the MANIFEST.MF file does not contain infos like "Created-By Apache Lucene Java",
neither does META-INF contain LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT.
Is there a reason why lucli behaves different in this regard? If not I think we should fix this.
Summary: MANIFEST.MF cleanup (main jar and luci customizations) (was: Lucli doesn't include standard MANIFEST.MF)
> MANIFEST.MF cleanup (main jar and luci customizations)
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-908
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-908
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Build
> Reporter: Michael Busch
> Assignee: Michael Busch
> Priority: Trivial
> Fix For: 2.2
>
>
> there are several problems with the MANIFEST.MF file used in the core jar, and some inconsistencies in th luci jar:
> Lucli's build.xml has an own "jar" target and does not use the jar target from common-build.xml. The result
> is that the MANIFEST.MF file is not consistent and the META-INF dir does not contain LICENSE.TXT and NOTICE.TXT.
> Is there a reason why lucli behaves different in this regard? If not I think we should fix this.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org