MISSING_SUBJECT misfiring?

[Greg Troxel <gd...@ir.bbn.com>]

This morning I had 4 messages in my folder for >=1 and < 2 points.
(Yes, I get it that this deviates from the >= 5 recommendation.)  I'm
not complaining about that per se, but in scanning the rules that fired,
I found a lot + and -, and they seemed correct.  All four were
mailinglist mail and I consider them ham.  This is normal so far.

All four had MISSING_SUBJECT, but when I looked at the headers they had
valid subjects.

I checked a message from a colleague in my inbox, and it too had
MISSING_SUBJECT, but enough - points to 

So I wonder if there is some recent breakage in the MISSING_SUBJECT
rule.

SpamAssassin version 3.4.1
  running on Perl version 5.22.0

and I have rules from 12/21 - hmm.   And I can't see that the rule looks
different or how one could make it not work.

Is anyone else seeing this?

Re: MISSING_SUBJECT misfiring?

[RW <rw...@googlemail.com>]

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016 10:01:15 -0500
Greg Troxel wrote:

> ...
> All four had MISSING_SUBJECT, but when I looked at the headers they
> had valid subjects.
> ...
> So I wonder if there is some recent breakage in the MISSING_SUBJECT
> rule.

I'm not seeing this.

Perhaps something is corrupting your headers before it gets to SA
and breaking header parsing.