You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Karol Szkudlarek <ka...@mikronika.com.pl> on 2003/12/12 12:54:59 UTC
unnecessary files in .svn directory
Hello!
I'm trying to persuade my collegues to change our cvs
productive repositorium to svn. And I am thinking that it
will be my success... :-)... but I have one complaint/request... :-)
In my opinion in .svn administrative directory should contain
only neccessary files. For example file README.TXT is redundant. And
.svn directory (in my opinion also :-)) is overcomplicated. It contains
too many subdirectories and many files with diffrent extensions for example
.svn-base, .svn-work. Maybe .svn requires some cleaning?
Redundant files are annoying very much when I am comparing two huge
directory trees (via external
diff program).
ps.
I am using 0.33.1 release server and client.
Many greets,
Karol Szkudlarek
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: unnecessary files in .svn directory
Posted by Erik Huelsmann <e....@gmx.net>.
> >In my opinion in .svn administrative directory should contain
> >only neccessary files. For example file README.TXT is redundant. And
> >.svn directory (in my opinion also :-)) is overcomplicated. It contains
> >too many subdirectories and many files with diffrent extensions for
> example
> >.svn-base, .svn-work. Maybe .svn requires some cleaning?
> I think people have talked about fixing up the README.TXT thing, not
> sure if it's going to happen pre-1.0.
yeah, we did. There were different opinions on the matter, but the one I
liked very much was to integrate the function of the format file into the
readme. The readme is a warning not to meddle with the administrative directories.
There was some discussion about using /dev/null (on unix) or NUL (on windows)
as a replacement for empty-file. That probably is not pre-1.0 .
The .svn-base files are required at least as long as we have locally
administered working copies.
> >Redundant files are annoying very much when I am comparing two huge
> >directory trees (via external
> >diff program).
This seems the best solution you can expect for the short term...
bye,
Erik.
--
+++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++
Neu: Preissenkung für MMS und FreeMMS! http://www.gmx.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: unnecessary files in .svn directory
Posted by Mike Mason <mg...@thoughtworks.net>.
Karol Szkudlarek wrote:
>In my opinion in .svn administrative directory should contain
>only neccessary files. For example file README.TXT is redundant. And
>.svn directory (in my opinion also :-)) is overcomplicated. It contains
>too many subdirectories and many files with diffrent extensions for example
>.svn-base, .svn-work. Maybe .svn requires some cleaning?
>
>
>
I think people have talked about fixing up the README.TXT thing, not
sure if it's going to happen pre-1.0.
>Redundant files are annoying very much when I am comparing two huge
>directory trees (via external
>diff program).
>
>
Tell your diff program to ignore .svn directories. For Gnu diff, use
"--exclude=.svn".
Cheers,
Mike.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org