You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2002/01/02 13:57:31 UTC

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 5654] - PS rendering doesn't seem to support landscape pages

DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG 
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5654>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND 
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=5654

PS rendering doesn't seem to support landscape pages

jeremias.maerki@outline.ch changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |RESOLVED
         Resolution|                            |WORKSFORME



------- Additional Comments From jeremias.maerki@outline.ch  2002-01-02 04:57 -------
PostScript does not care about "portrait" or "landscape". These facets are 
often device-dependent. Device-dependent stuff has not been adressed yet in the 
PostScript renderer. Of course, there is, for example, no "BoundingBox" 
or "PageOrientation" generated in the DSC comments at the moment, so Viewers or 
Printers may have problems deciding what paper to choose. If you can force the 
output device to use landscape (ex. GhostView) then the document will be 
displayed correctly.

For the device-dependent stuff I currently patch each PostScript file adding 
some commands at the appropriate places that setup the output device (paper bin 
etc.). Since PS renderer generates ASCII-type Postscript files and most DSC-
Comments, this is pretty simple and fast.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, email: fop-dev-help@xml.apache.org