You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to xindice-dev@xml.apache.org by Kimbro Staken <ks...@xmldatabases.org> on 2002/02/19 14:41:25 UTC
Shipping 1.0?
What are peoples thoughts on getting 1.0 out the door? RC1 had a issue
with index corrupted errors that is fixed in CVS. I was planning to do a
small 1.0RC1A release or something, but I'm kind of inclined just to call
it 1.0 and move on. What do you think?
Kimbro Staken
XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
http://www.xmldatabases.org/
Re: Shipping 1.0?
Posted by Kimbro Staken <ks...@xmldatabases.org>.
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 07:48 AM, Kurt Ward wrote:
>
> --- Chad La Joie <cl...@vt.edu> wrote:
>> I think I'd release an RC2 (w/ the index corruption
>> fix) and let it sit for
>> a week. If no one comes back with bugs then tag it
>> 1.0
>
> I agree. It seems that there are still a couple of
> minor things that would be nice to have fixed before
> 1.0
I agree now too. 1.0RC2 should probably be the next release.
>
>> At 08:41 AM 2/19/2002, you wrote:
>>> What are peoples thoughts on getting 1.0 out the
>> door? RC1 had a issue
>>> with index corrupted errors that is fixed in CVS. I
>> was planning to do a
>>> small 1.0RC1A release or something, but I'm kind of
>> inclined just to call
>>> it 1.0 and move on. What do you think?
>>>
>>> Kimbro Staken
>>> XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
>>> http://www.xmldatabases.org/
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> http://sports.yahoo.com
>
>
Kimbro Staken - http://www.kstaken.org - http://www.xmldatabases.org
Apache Xindice native XML database http://xml.apache.org
XML:DB Initiative http://www.xmldb.org
Senior Technologist (Your company name here)
Re: Shipping 1.0?
Posted by Kurt Ward <ku...@yahoo.com>.
--- Chad La Joie <cl...@vt.edu> wrote:
> I think I'd release an RC2 (w/ the index corruption
> fix) and let it sit for
> a week. If no one comes back with bugs then tag it
> 1.0
I agree. It seems that there are still a couple of
minor things that would be nice to have fixed before
1.0
> At 08:41 AM 2/19/2002, you wrote:
> >What are peoples thoughts on getting 1.0 out the
> door? RC1 had a issue
> >with index corrupted errors that is fixed in CVS. I
> was planning to do a
> >small 1.0RC1A release or something, but I'm kind of
> inclined just to call
> >it 1.0 and move on. What do you think?
> >
> >Kimbro Staken
> >XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
> >http://www.xmldatabases.org/
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
Re: Shipping 1.0?
Posted by Chad La Joie <cl...@vt.edu>.
I think I'd release an RC2 (w/ the index corruption fix) and let it sit for
a week. If no one comes back with bugs then tag it 1.0
At 08:41 AM 2/19/2002, you wrote:
>What are peoples thoughts on getting 1.0 out the door? RC1 had a issue
>with index corrupted errors that is fixed in CVS. I was planning to do a
>small 1.0RC1A release or something, but I'm kind of inclined just to call
>it 1.0 and move on. What do you think?
>
>Kimbro Staken
>XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
>http://www.xmldatabases.org/
Re: Indexing Bug [was Shipping 1.0?]
Posted by Kurt Ward <ku...@yahoo.com>.
> On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 04:26 PM, Tom Bradford wrote:
> > You mean the part after </database>? That's ok. When you overwrite a
> > page, it won't zero out old data, it will simply overwrite it, and use
> > a length field on the page to determine how much to read in.
Thanks for clarifying. I was thinking maybe this was the case since there
were
no errors on starting on the db.
> BTW, you can always retrieve the database configuration:
>
> % xindice rd -c /db/system/SysConfig -n database.xml
Thanks for the tip, this will certainly com in handy.
> --
> Tom Bradford - http://www.tbradford.org
> Architect - XQRL (XQuery Engine) - http://www.xqrl.com
> Apache Xindice (Native XML Database) - http://xml.apache.org
> Project Labrador (Web Services Framework) - http://notdotnet.org
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Indexing Bug [was Shipping 1.0?]
Posted by Tom Bradford <to...@mac.com>.
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 04:26 PM, Tom Bradford wrote:
> You mean the part after </database>? That's ok. When you overwrite a
> page, it won't zero out old data, it will simply overwrite it, and use
> a length field on the page to determine how much to read in.
BTW, you can always retrieve the database configuration:
% xindice rd -c /db/system/SysConfig -n database.xml
--
Tom Bradford - http://www.tbradford.org
Architect - XQRL (XQuery Engine) - http://www.xqrl.com
Apache Xindice (Native XML Database) - http://xml.apache.org
Project Labrador (Web Services Framework) - http://notdotnet.org
Re: Indexing Bug [was Shipping 1.0?]
Posted by Tom Bradford <to...@mac.com>.
On Friday, February 22, 2002, at 04:29 PM, Kurt Ward wrote:
> <database name="db"><xmlobjects /><collections><collection
> compressed="true"
> name="test"><filer class="org.apache.xindice.core.filer.BTreeFiler"
> /><indexes /><xmlobjects /></collection></collections></database>**exer"
> name="test" pattern="test" />**</indexes><xmlobjects
> /></collection></collections></database>**me="test2" pattern="test"
> /></indexes><xmlobjects /></collection>**</collections></database>
>
> In particular, notice that both indexes I created remain as a fragment
> of
> the original node (highlighted with ** **), along with some portions
> of the
> remaining collection configuration.
You mean the part after </database>? That's ok. When you overwrite a
page, it won't zero out old data, it will simply overwrite it, and use a
length field on the page to determine how much to read in.
--
Tom Bradford - http://www.tbradford.org
Architect - XQRL (XQuery Engine) - http://www.xqrl.com
Apache Xindice (Native XML Database) - http://xml.apache.org
Project Labrador (Web Services Framework) - http://notdotnet.org
Re: Indexing Bug [was Shipping 1.0?]
Posted by Kurt Ward <ku...@yahoo.com>.
Kimbro,
I tested updated from CVS and tested on Win2k and Linux (Slackware 8).
Looks like the problem
was fixed that was reporting the error, but I am still concerned about the
document fragments in the
SysConfig.tbl file. Using the command line tools, I created a collection,
added a single document, and created to indexes. When I drop the indexes,
the .tbl file looks like this:
<database name="db"><xmlobjects /><collections><collection compressed="true"
name="test"><filer class="org.apache.xindice.core.filer.BTreeFiler"
/><indexes /><xmlobjects /></collection></collections></database>**exer"
name="test" pattern="test" />**</indexes><xmlobjects
/></collection></collections></database>**me="test2" pattern="test"
/></indexes><xmlobjects /></collection>**</collections></database>
In particular, notice that both indexes I created remain as a fragment of
the original node (highlighted with ** **), along with some portions of the
remaining collection configuration.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kimbro Staken" <ks...@xmldatabases.org>
To: <xi...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 5:40 PM
Subject: Re: Shipping 1.0?
> Can you update from CVS and see if this is fixed? I was able to reproduce
> it, and it works for me now.
>
> On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 07:45 AM, Kurt Ward wrote:
>
> > Using the command line tools, I received this error on
> > creating in index:
> >
> > DEBUG> Index Creation: ione
> > DEBUG>
> > org.apache.xindice.core.filer.FilerException: Error
> > performing flush!
> > at
> > org.apache.xindice.core.filer.Paged.flush(Unknown
> > Source)
> > at
> > org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.ValueIndexer.flush(Unknown
> > Source)
> > at
> > org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager.populateNewIndexers(Unkn
> > own Source)
> > at
> > org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager.access$300(Unknown
> > Sourc
> > e)
> > at
> > org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager$AutoIndexer.run(Unknown
> > Source)
> > DEBUG> Index Complete: ione
> > DEBUG> Populated Indexes: 250ms
> >
> > I get this same error if I call the createIndexer()
> > function via XML-RPC also. This is on Win2k, CVS
> > from today.
> >
> > Also, I'm still seeing the fragments in the
> > SysConfig.tbl file after creating and then dropping
> > an index(s).
> >
> > Any ideas?
> >
> >
> > --- Kimbro Staken <ks...@xmldatabases.org> wrote:
> >> What are peoples thoughts on getting 1.0 out the
> >> door? RC1 had a issue
> >> with index corrupted errors that is fixed in CVS. I
> >> was planning to do a
> >> small 1.0RC1A release or something, but I'm kind of
> >> inclined just to call
> >> it 1.0 and move on. What do you think?
> >>
> >> Kimbro Staken
> >> XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
> >> http://www.xmldatabases.org/
> >>
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> > http://sports.yahoo.com
> >
> >
> Kimbro Staken - http://www.kstaken.org - http://www.xmldatabases.org
> Apache Xindice native XML database http://xml.apache.org
> XML:DB Initiative http://www.xmldb.org
> Senior Technologist (Your company name here)
_________________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Shipping 1.0?
Posted by Kimbro Staken <ks...@xmldatabases.org>.
Can you update from CVS and see if this is fixed? I was able to reproduce
it, and it works for me now.
On Tuesday, February 19, 2002, at 07:45 AM, Kurt Ward wrote:
> Using the command line tools, I received this error on
> creating in index:
>
> DEBUG> Index Creation: ione
> DEBUG>
> org.apache.xindice.core.filer.FilerException: Error
> performing flush!
> at
> org.apache.xindice.core.filer.Paged.flush(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.ValueIndexer.flush(Unknown
> Source)
> at
> org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager.populateNewIndexers(Unkn
> own Source)
> at
> org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager.access$300(Unknown
> Sourc
> e)
> at
> org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager$AutoIndexer.run(Unknown
> Source)
> DEBUG> Index Complete: ione
> DEBUG> Populated Indexes: 250ms
>
> I get this same error if I call the createIndexer()
> function via XML-RPC also. This is on Win2k, CVS
> from today.
>
> Also, I'm still seeing the fragments in the
> SysConfig.tbl file after creating and then dropping
> an index(s).
>
> Any ideas?
>
>
> --- Kimbro Staken <ks...@xmldatabases.org> wrote:
>> What are peoples thoughts on getting 1.0 out the
>> door? RC1 had a issue
>> with index corrupted errors that is fixed in CVS. I
>> was planning to do a
>> small 1.0RC1A release or something, but I'm kind of
>> inclined just to call
>> it 1.0 and move on. What do you think?
>>
>> Kimbro Staken
>> XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
>> http://www.xmldatabases.org/
>>
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
> http://sports.yahoo.com
>
>
Kimbro Staken - http://www.kstaken.org - http://www.xmldatabases.org
Apache Xindice native XML database http://xml.apache.org
XML:DB Initiative http://www.xmldb.org
Senior Technologist (Your company name here)
Re: Shipping 1.0?
Posted by Kurt Ward <ku...@yahoo.com>.
Using the command line tools, I received this error on
creating in index:
DEBUG> Index Creation: ione
DEBUG>
org.apache.xindice.core.filer.FilerException: Error
performing flush!
at
org.apache.xindice.core.filer.Paged.flush(Unknown
Source)
at
org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.ValueIndexer.flush(Unknown
Source)
at
org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager.populateNewIndexers(Unkn
own Source)
at
org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager.access$300(Unknown
Sourc
e)
at
org.apache.xindice.core.indexer.IndexManager$AutoIndexer.run(Unknown
Source)
DEBUG> Index Complete: ione
DEBUG> Populated Indexes: 250ms
I get this same error if I call the createIndexer()
function via XML-RPC also. This is on Win2k, CVS
from today.
Also, I'm still seeing the fragments in the
SysConfig.tbl file after creating and then dropping
an index(s).
Any ideas?
--- Kimbro Staken <ks...@xmldatabases.org> wrote:
> What are peoples thoughts on getting 1.0 out the
> door? RC1 had a issue
> with index corrupted errors that is fixed in CVS. I
> was planning to do a
> small 1.0RC1A release or something, but I'm kind of
> inclined just to call
> it 1.0 and move on. What do you think?
>
> Kimbro Staken
> XML Database Software, Consulting and Writing
> http://www.xmldatabases.org/
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com