You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwebbeans.apache.org by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID> on 2017/09/01 11:21:03 UTC
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Hi lords & ladies!
The VOTE has passed with the following
+1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
no -1 nor 0 got received.
I'll continue with the release steps.
Should hit maven.central shortly..
txs and LieGrue,
strub
> Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
>
> Hi folks!
>
> I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
>
> This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
>
> The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
>
> Bug
> • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
> • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
> • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
> • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
> • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
> Task
> • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
>
>
> The staging repo can be found here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
>
> The source release is under
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
>
>
> Please VOTE
>
> [+1] go for it!
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
>
> The VOTE is open for 72h
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
Glad you found it finally and thanks for voting!
Next tasks on the list is to continue with OpenJPA-3.0.0 and TomEE8 :)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 03.09.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Mark
>
> I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
>
> I dreamt it?
>
>
> On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Glad you found it finally and thanks for voting!
Next tasks on the list is to continue with OpenJPA-3.0.0 and TomEE8 :)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 03.09.2017 um 19:12 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>:
>
> Hi Mark
>
> I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
>
> I dreamt it?
>
>
> On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark
I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time
tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
I dreamt it?
On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard
> Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.INVALID
> >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in
> 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
>
Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache OpenWebBeans-2.0.1
Posted by Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <je...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark
I remember you mentioned a meecrowave vote was ongoing. Had a bit of time
tonight to review and vote but can't find the thread.
I dreamt it?
On ven. 1 sept. 2017 à 13:21 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> Hi lords & ladies!
>
> The VOTE has passed with the following
>
> +1: Romain Manni-Bucau, John Ament, Jean-Louis Monteiro, Reinhard
> Sandtner, Gerhard Petracek, Matthew Broadhead, Mark Struberg
>
> no -1 nor 0 got received.
>
> I'll continue with the release steps.
> Should hit maven.central shortly..
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> > Am 29.08.2017 um 11:16 schrieb Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de.INVALID
> >:
> >
> > Hi folks!
> >
> > I did run the necessary steps to ship OWB-2.0.1 from trunk, which is our
> CDI-2.0 implementation.
> > We improved the SE support (hope to finish it soon and ship all in
> 2.0.2) and a few Instance and Event fixes.
> >
> > This build passes the standalone CDI TCK and we already fixed a few EE
> integration bugs as well while integrating OWB in the upcoming TomEE8.
> >
> > The following bugs and enhancements got fixed:
> >
> > Bug
> > • [OWB-1199] - CDISeScannerService.autoScanning should be true by
> default
> > • [OWB-1203] - GProcessSyntheticBean not handled correctly for
> extensions leading to incorrect ProcessBean behavior
> > • [OWB-1204] - Interceptor and Decorator ignored in annotated mode
> if not decorated with @Dependent
> > • [OWB-1205] - We should not fire ProcessInjectionPoint for CDI
> Extension Observers
> > • [OWB-1207] - Inconsistent behavior of the instance behind
> CDI.current()
> > • [OWB-1209] - Custom bean with isAlternative()=true should not be
> automatically enabled
> > • [OWB-1210] - Providing an own alternative implementation of
> Provider<T> might disable some Instance<T> resolving
> > • [OWB-1211] - OWB is not firing BeforeDestroyed on contexts
> > • [OWB-1213] - producer of URI or other classes with private ct
> blow up with a NPE
> > Task
> > • [OWB-1086] - initial setup for cdi-2.0
> >
> >
> > The staging repo can be found here:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/
> >
> > The source release is under
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheopenwebbeans-1031/org/apache/openwebbeans/openwebbeans/2.0.1/
> >
> >
> > Please VOTE
> >
> > [+1] go for it!
> > [+0] meh, don't care
> > [-1] stop because there is a ${showstopper}
> >
> > The VOTE is open for 72h
> >
> > txs and LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
> >
>
>