You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@calcite.apache.org by "Stamatis Zampetakis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2019/04/16 12:42:00 UTC

[jira] [Resolved] (CALCITE-2994) Least restrictive type among structs does not consider nullability

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2994?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Stamatis Zampetakis resolved CALCITE-2994.
------------------------------------------
    Resolution: Fixed

Fixed in [395aa85085e0dad1ba14d8761aeb79b2b11c3809|https://github.com/apache/calcite/commit/395aa85085e0dad1ba14d8761aeb79b2b11c3809]!

> Least restrictive type among structs does not consider nullability 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CALCITE-2994
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2994
>             Project: Calcite
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Assignee: Stamatis Zampetakis
>            Priority: Major
>              Labels: pull-request-available
>             Fix For: 1.20.0
>
>          Time Spent: 50m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Consider the following high-level example:
> {code:sql}
> CREATE TYPE Coordinates AS (
>   x INT,
>   y INT);
> CREATE TABLE Address (
>   loc1 Coordinates NOT NULL,
>   loc2 Coordinates)
> {code}
> The least restrictive type between loc1 and loc2 is the type of loc2 (i.e., a nullable Coordinates type). 
> The existing code (i.e., RelDataTypeFactory#leastRestrictive) does take into account nullability when the type is structured type (or row type). 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)