You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@struts.apache.org by Michael McGrady <mi...@michaelmcgrady.com> on 2004/09/18 23:45:33 UTC
DispatchUtil and SimpleDispatchAction
Lets compare and contrast, on the one hand, DispatchAction and its
progeny, and, on the other hand, DispatchUtil and SimpleDispatchAction.
What they have in common is that they are patterns relating to Strust
which obtain the method name for a class. This was important initially
because <input type='image'> does not have a parameter name one can
mine, obtain, get, etc., when there are multiple images involved.
Different Code
The two patterns use completely different logic to obtain the name of
the method to use reflection on. DispatchAction and its progeny go for
the value of some parameter or property in HttpServletRequest or
ActionMapping. DispatchUtil and its assciated class go for the NAME of
some request parameter or property in HttpServletRequest or
ActionMapping. If you don't want to use Struts, DispatchUtil has
ImageTagUtil as your choice. If you don't use Struts, the pattern in
DispatchAction won't work for you without huge changes. There are many,
many other options we could discuss, if people did not keep thinking
there was no difference and remain blind to the situation.
Common Code
The common code is the code that employs reflection AFTER the method
name is obtain. Niall notices this and thinks that the different
classes are almost identical. This reflection code is, of course,
completely generic and has almost nothing to do with either action, and
could be jettisoned without much ado.
Michael McGradt
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org