[jira] [Commented] (HDFS-6092) DistributedFileSystem#getCanonicalServiceName() and DistributedFileSystem#getUri() may return inconsistent results w.r.t. port

["Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6092?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14628282#comment-14628282 ] 

Hadoop QA commented on HDFS-6092:
---------------------------------

\\
\\
| (x) *{color:red}-1 overall{color}* |
\\
\\
|| Vote || Subsystem || Runtime || Comment ||
| {color:red}-1{color} | patch |   0m  0s | The patch command could not apply the patch during dryrun. |
\\
\\
|| Subsystem || Report/Notes ||
| Patch URL | http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/attachment/12634494/HDFS-6092-v4.patch |
| Optional Tests | javadoc javac unit findbugs checkstyle |
| git revision | trunk / edcaae4 |
| Console output | https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-HDFS-Build/11715/console |


This message was automatically generated.

> DistributedFileSystem#getCanonicalServiceName() and DistributedFileSystem#getUri() may return inconsistent results w.r.t. port
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HDFS-6092
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-6092
>             Project: Hadoop HDFS
>          Issue Type: Bug
>    Affects Versions: 2.3.0
>            Reporter: Ted Yu
>              Labels: BB2015-05-TBR
>         Attachments: HDFS-6092-v4.patch, haosdent-HDFS-6092-v2.patch, haosdent-HDFS-6092.patch, hdfs-6092-v1.txt, hdfs-6092-v2.txt, hdfs-6092-v3.txt
>
>
> I discovered this when working on HBASE-10717
> Here is sample code to reproduce the problem:
> {code}
>     Path desPath = new Path("hdfs://127.0.0.1/");
>     FileSystem desFs = desPath.getFileSystem(conf);
>     
>     String s = desFs.getCanonicalServiceName();
>     URI uri = desFs.getUri();
> {code}
> Canonical name string contains the default port - 8020
> But uri doesn't contain port.
> This would result in the following exception:
> {code}
> testIsSameHdfs(org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.TestFSHDFSUtils)  Time elapsed: 0.001 sec  <<< ERROR!
> java.lang.IllegalArgumentException: port out of range:-1
>         at java.net.InetSocketAddress.checkPort(InetSocketAddress.java:143)
>         at java.net.InetSocketAddress.<init>(InetSocketAddress.java:224)
>         at org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.FSHDFSUtils.getNNAddresses(FSHDFSUtils.java:88)
> {code}
> Thanks to Brando Li who helped debug this.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)