should we label our NetCAT-reported issues with netcat90 or something like that?

[Alied Pérez Martínez <al...@gmail.com>]

Well, that which I wrote in the subject. In past events we (actually the
bug submission form did it) used to add a prefix like "[cat82]". I think
we could take advantage of Jira's labels for that. Also we can label the
issues reported while running Synergy tests and even (when integrated)
the exception reporter can have it's label as well. What do you think?

Re: should we label our NetCAT-reported issues with netcat90 or something like that?

[Jiří Kovalský <ji...@oracle.com>]

I don't think anything like that is needed or in other words all bug 
reporters are equal.

My two cents,
-Jirka

Dne 3.4.2018 v 04:45 Alied Pérez Martínez napsal(a):

> Well, that which I wrote in the subject. In past events we (actually the
> bug submission form did it) used to add a prefix like "[cat82]". I think
> we could take advantage of Jira's labels for that. Also we can label the
> issues reported while running Synergy tests and even (when integrated)
> the exception reporter can have it's label as well. What do you think?

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: netcat-unsubscribe@netbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: netcat-help@netbeans.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists