You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@xmlbeans.apache.org by sendy <se...@posterita.org> on 2009/07/13 09:09:02 UTC
Entitized characters in attribute values
Hi everybody,
It seems that special characters < and & are entitized as < and &
respectively, but not >.
Is there any reason to that? According to xml specs, or at least to my
understanding of it :-) , shouldn't > be entitized even when in attribute
value?
Thanks,
Sendy
--
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Entitized-characters-in-attribute-values-tp24457087p24457087.html
Sent from the Xml Beans - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xmlbeans.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xmlbeans.apache.org
Re: Entitized characters in attribute values
Posted by David Waite <ma...@akuma.org>.
The textual contents of an element is controlled by the CharData
symbol ( http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#NT-CharData ):
[14] CharData ::= [^<&]* - ([^<&]* ']]>' [^<&]*)
Only '<', and '&' are disallowed (as they indicate the start of other
XML symbols) , so quotes, double-quotes and greater than ('>') symbols
do not require any encoding.
Similarly for AttValue ( http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/#NT-AttValue ):
[10] AttValue ::= '"' ([^<&"] | Reference)* '"'
| "'" ([^<&'] | Reference)* "'"
Only '<', '&' and the particular quoting character used to surround
the attribute value are disallowed; the other quote character and
greater than ('>') do not require any encoding.
Of course these characters could be encoded (just as any character
could be specified with a numeric character reference) - there just
isn't a need to, and it increases the document size and processing
required.
-DW
On Jul 13, 2009, at 1:09 AM, sendy wrote:
>
> Hi everybody,
>
> It seems that special characters < and & are entitized as < and
> &
> respectively, but not >.
> Is there any reason to that? According to xml specs, or at least to my
> understanding of it :-) , shouldn't > be entitized even when in
> attribute
> value?
>
> Thanks,
> Sendy
> --
> View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Entitized-characters-in-attribute-values-tp24457087p24457087.html
> Sent from the Xml Beans - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@xmlbeans.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@xmlbeans.apache.org
>