You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> on 2007/11/21 14:32:05 UTC

openejb-core dependency on activemq-core

In the org.apache.openejb.config.sys.PropertiesAdapter class, there is a
reference to org.apache.activemq.util.ByteArrayOutputStream.  I'm wondering
if this is a type and should be a reference to the java.util class instead.
This would remove a hard dependency on activemq.
Thoughts ?

Btw, I've deployed a new set of snapshots yesterday as there was a problem
with the latest ones: it seems they have not been completely deployed due to
permissions problems that Jacek solved in the snapshot repo (which caused
only a few jars to be uploaded).

-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Re: openejb-core dependency on activemq-core

Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
On Nov 21, 2007 11:26 PM, David Blevins <da...@visi.com> wrote:

>
> On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:
>
> > Btw, I've created a jira (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-725
> > )
> > and attached a small patch.
> >
> > On Nov 21, 2007 2:32 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> In the org.apache.openejb.config.sys.PropertiesAdapter class, there
> >> is a
> >> reference to org.apache.activemq.util.ByteArrayOutputStream.  I'm
> >> wondering if this is a type and should be a reference to the
> >> java.utilclass instead.  This would remove a hard dependency on
> >> activemq.
> >> Thoughts ?
>
> Thanks!  That shouldn't have been there.


I've raised a JIRA with a patch attached for that.


>
>
> >> Btw, I've deployed a new set of snapshots yesterday as there was a
> >> problem
> >> with the latest ones: it seems they have not been completely
> >> deployed due to
> >> permissions problems that Jacek solved in the snapshot repo (which
> >> caused
> >> only a few jars to be uploaded).
>
> Is it solved or still unsolved?  Can ask an admin to chmod our repo if
> not.


The repo permissions are solved afaik, but my upload failed a bit before the
end so that
it is still a bit inconsistent (though most of the jars have been uploaded
successfully).


>
>
> -David
>
>


-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/

Re: openejb-core dependency on activemq-core

Posted by David Blevins <da...@visi.com>.
On Nov 21, 2007, at 5:45 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote:

> Btw, I've created a jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-725 
> )
> and attached a small patch.
>
> On Nov 21, 2007 2:32 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In the org.apache.openejb.config.sys.PropertiesAdapter class, there  
>> is a
>> reference to org.apache.activemq.util.ByteArrayOutputStream.  I'm
>> wondering if this is a type and should be a reference to the  
>> java.utilclass instead.  This would remove a hard dependency on  
>> activemq.
>> Thoughts ?

Thanks!  That shouldn't have been there.

>> Btw, I've deployed a new set of snapshots yesterday as there was a  
>> problem
>> with the latest ones: it seems they have not been completely  
>> deployed due to
>> permissions problems that Jacek solved in the snapshot repo (which  
>> caused
>> only a few jars to be uploaded).

Is it solved or still unsolved?  Can ask an admin to chmod our repo if  
not.

-David


Re: openejb-core dependency on activemq-core

Posted by Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com>.
Btw, I've created a jira (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-725)
and attached a small patch.

On Nov 21, 2007 2:32 PM, Guillaume Nodet <gn...@gmail.com> wrote:

> In the org.apache.openejb.config.sys.PropertiesAdapter class, there is a
> reference to org.apache.activemq.util.ByteArrayOutputStream.  I'm
> wondering if this is a type and should be a reference to the java.utilclass instead.  This would remove a hard dependency on activemq.
> Thoughts ?
>
> Btw, I've deployed a new set of snapshots yesterday as there was a problem
> with the latest ones: it seems they have not been completely deployed due to
> permissions problems that Jacek solved in the snapshot repo (which caused
> only a few jars to be uploaded).
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Guillaume Nodet
> ------------------------
> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/




-- 
Cheers,
Guillaume Nodet
------------------------
Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/