You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@karaf.apache.org by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> on 2011/10/17 11:03:54 UTC

Re: The new command aliases in Karaf 2.2.4

Hi Claus,

You are right: it depends if the command accepts several bundles or not.

For instance:

- bundles:start 23 34 56
- system:shutdown (no argument)

On trunk, you will see bundle:* or bundles:* commands. It's the same: it 
depends if the commands accept several bundles, or only one.

No problem to discuss if it's better to use the singular name (bundle:*, 
service:*, system:*). I'm fine with that, let see what the others think ;)

For Camel, I plan more to use sub-shell in the future:

karaf@root> camel
karaf@root/camel> routes:list
karaf@root/camel> contexts:list

I will work on sub-shells on Karaf trunk.

Regards
JB

On 10/17/2011 10:53 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was reading Jean's blog about the Karaf 2.2.4 release
> http://blog.nanthrax.net/2011/10/whats-new-in-karaf-2-2-4/
>
> And read about the command aliases, which IMHO seems like a good thing.
>
> However just wondering why you use the plural naming?
> - bundles
> - services
>
> And then you have a non plural for system
> - system
>
> I guess the answer is that there is always 1 system, and you can have
> 0..N bundles/services.
>
> I am just used to have singular naming such as
> - system
> - bundle
> - service
>
> And for 3rd party plugins, we have a Camel plugin that is singular as well
> - camel
>
> Anyway tab completion will help me pick the right command :)
>
>

-- 
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com

Re: The new command aliases in Karaf 2.2.4

Posted by mikevan <mv...@comcast.net>.

+1 to this change on 3.0.  I like the idea of leaving the console commands
the same on the 2.x branches.


Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> 
> Hi Claus,
> 
> it's my plan: leave packages:* command as it is on karaf-2.2.x branch, 
> but change it on trunk (to be consistent).
> 
> Regards
> JB
> 
> On 10/18/2011 11:11 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré&lt;jb@&gt;  wrote:
>>> What do you think about packages:* commands ? Does it make sense to
>>> rename
>>> it to package:* ?
>>>
>>
>> I think the Karaf community is to be asked :)
>>
>> Yeah I like singular as consistency. But for already released and used
>> names it can be hard to change.
>> Possible consider name changes for Karaf 3.0.0 and leave it as is on
>> the 2.x branches.
>>
>>
>>> Regards
>>> JB
>>>
>>> On 10/17/2011 12:20 PM, Ioannis Canellos wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 on the singular.
>>>>
>>>> Moreover, it will save you a<TAB>    when you are using auto completion
>>>> :-D
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
>>> jbonofre@
>>> http://blog.nanthrax.net
>>> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>>>
>>
>>
>>
> 
> -- 
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
> 


-----
Mike Van  (All links open in new tabs)
Committer - Kalumet 

Atraxia Technologies 

NCI Inc 

Mike Van's Open Source Technologies Blog 
--
View this message in context: http://karaf.922171.n3.nabble.com/Re-The-new-command-aliases-in-Karaf-2-2-4-tp3427657p3431339.html
Sent from the Karaf - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.