You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com> on 2015/02/13 02:05:15 UTC
Sqoop developer meetings
Hi Sqoop developers
Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off meetings to discuss issues.
I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled every other week or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
What do you guys think?
Thanks
Venkat
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Sounds good to me. Thanks man!
On Thu, Feb 26, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Sorry for the delay
>
> I am down with flu for most of the week. Arvind requested that
> " first document the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing
> list, and put it a vote for approval"
>
> We can start with the documenting the process on the wiki. I will put up
> something shortly once I feel better and we can discuss and put it to vote
> as suggested.
>
> Sounds good?
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
> ________________________________________
> From: Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 2:59 PM
> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
>
> Venkat,
>
> It has been about a week since the last member of the community has added
> to this thread. Let's set a date and location?
>
> -Abe
>
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Arvind for chiming in! I wanted to make sure we get an idea from
> > the contributors
> > About the mechanics before we write up a proposal and vote on it.
> > +1 for having a process along the lines outlined below.
> >
> >
> > Venkat
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/18/15, 1:50 PM, "Ahmed Radwan" <ah...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >Thanks Arvind! +1 for following this process.
> > >
> > >On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>
> > >wrote:
> > >
> > >> While I appreciate the enthusiasm of folks on this thread who would
> > >>like to
> > >> see such calls/meetings happen - I am a bit wary for the reasons noted
> > >> below.
> > >>
> > >> Those of us who were on the Sqoop PMC during mid-2012 will recall that
> > >>the
> > >> project did such meetings before too. They will also recall that it
> > >>raised
> > >> some questions from the board regarding the conduct of these meetings.
> > >> Specifically - to ensure that anyone from anywhere could join the
> calls,
> > >> that no decisions were made on these calls, and that important
> > >>discussions
> > >> that sparked off in the call be brought back to the mailing list for
> > >> further continuation and conclusion. Thanks to the members of the
> Sqoop
> > >>PMC
> > >> at that time, we followed this with due diligence and were able to
> > >>ensure
> > >> that these conditions were adequately met. The specifics of the
> process
> > >>at
> > >> that time were as follows:
> > >>
> > >> 1. A one-week notice for the meetings (eg [1]), using a system that
> > >>allowed
> > >> easy participation from anywhere in the world. At that time we were
> > >>using
> > >> WebEx call bridge that provided toll-free access numbers for various
> > >> countries. The announcement was also posted on the JIRA being
> discussed
> > >>in
> > >> these meetings (eg [2])
> > >>
> > >> 2. The meeting minutes were sent out on the email list (eg [3]), and
> > >> recorded on the wiki for posterity (eg [4]).
> > >>
> > >> 3. Any actionable items discussed were brought back to the Jira with
> > >>full
> > >> context and follow-up through the regular mailing-list/Jira resolution
> > >> process (eg [5]).
> > >>
> > >> That was done in mid-2012. If we were to do this now, I would request
> > >>the
> > >> PMC to follow the process diligently to ensure that it stays open,
> > >> transparent, and inclusive to the broader community that Sqoop has. To
> > >>that
> > >> affect, I would request the champions of these meetings to first
> > >>document
> > >> the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put
> > >>it to
> > >> a vote for approval.
> > >>
> > >> [1] http://s.apache.org/9tF
> > >> [2] http://s.apache.org/Pzb
> > >> [3] http://s.apache.org/Map
> > >> [4]
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Weekly+Meeting+M
> > >>inutes
> > >> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-491
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Arvind Prabhakar
> > >>
> > >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, SHANKAR REDDY <
> > >> sankara.telukutla@gmail.com
> > >> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> > '+1
> > >> >
> > >> > Kind Regards,
> > >> > Sankara Telukutla
> > >> > +1 510 936 0999
> > >> >
> > >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > >> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > > Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over
> > >>couple
> > >> > of
> > >> > > meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Developers/Contributors
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Please share ideas on how you want to do it
> > >> > >
> > >> > > Thanks
> > >> > > Venkat
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > >
> > >> > > On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >> > >
> > >> > > >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular
> > >> community
> > >> > > >contributor sync ups :)
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >Jarcec
> > >> > > >
> > >> > > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> > >> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since
> some
> > >> > folks
> > >> > > >> +are in China :)
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> Regards
> > >> > > >> Richard
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> > > >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> > >> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> > >> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > >> > > >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> +1
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
> > >> > > >><vb...@cloudera.com>
> > >> > > >> wrote:
> > >> > > >>
> > >> > > >>> +1. Love to.
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> Regards
> > >> > > >>> Veena
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > >> > > >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one
> off
> > >> > > >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might
> be a
> > >> good
> > >> > > >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say
> scheduled
> > >> > > >>>> every other
> > >> > > >>> week
> > >> > > >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> What do you guys think?
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> Thanks
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>> Venkat
> > >> > > >>>>
> > >> > > >>>
> > >> > > >
> > >> > >
> > >> >
> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Sorry for the delay
I am down with flu for most of the week. Arvind requested that
" first document the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put it a vote for approval"
We can start with the documenting the process on the wiki. I will put up something shortly once I feel better and we can discuss and put it to vote as suggested.
Sounds good?
Thanks
Venkat
________________________________________
From: Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>
Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 2:59 PM
To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Venkat,
It has been about a week since the last member of the community has added
to this thread. Let's set a date and location?
-Abe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks Arvind for chiming in! I wanted to make sure we get an idea from
> the contributors
> About the mechanics before we write up a proposal and vote on it.
> +1 for having a process along the lines outlined below.
>
>
> Venkat
>
>
>
>
> On 2/18/15, 1:50 PM, "Ahmed Radwan" <ah...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Arvind! +1 for following this process.
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> While I appreciate the enthusiasm of folks on this thread who would
> >>like to
> >> see such calls/meetings happen - I am a bit wary for the reasons noted
> >> below.
> >>
> >> Those of us who were on the Sqoop PMC during mid-2012 will recall that
> >>the
> >> project did such meetings before too. They will also recall that it
> >>raised
> >> some questions from the board regarding the conduct of these meetings.
> >> Specifically - to ensure that anyone from anywhere could join the calls,
> >> that no decisions were made on these calls, and that important
> >>discussions
> >> that sparked off in the call be brought back to the mailing list for
> >> further continuation and conclusion. Thanks to the members of the Sqoop
> >>PMC
> >> at that time, we followed this with due diligence and were able to
> >>ensure
> >> that these conditions were adequately met. The specifics of the process
> >>at
> >> that time were as follows:
> >>
> >> 1. A one-week notice for the meetings (eg [1]), using a system that
> >>allowed
> >> easy participation from anywhere in the world. At that time we were
> >>using
> >> WebEx call bridge that provided toll-free access numbers for various
> >> countries. The announcement was also posted on the JIRA being discussed
> >>in
> >> these meetings (eg [2])
> >>
> >> 2. The meeting minutes were sent out on the email list (eg [3]), and
> >> recorded on the wiki for posterity (eg [4]).
> >>
> >> 3. Any actionable items discussed were brought back to the Jira with
> >>full
> >> context and follow-up through the regular mailing-list/Jira resolution
> >> process (eg [5]).
> >>
> >> That was done in mid-2012. If we were to do this now, I would request
> >>the
> >> PMC to follow the process diligently to ensure that it stays open,
> >> transparent, and inclusive to the broader community that Sqoop has. To
> >>that
> >> affect, I would request the champions of these meetings to first
> >>document
> >> the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put
> >>it to
> >> a vote for approval.
> >>
> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/9tF
> >> [2] http://s.apache.org/Pzb
> >> [3] http://s.apache.org/Map
> >> [4]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Weekly+Meeting+M
> >>inutes
> >> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-491
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Arvind Prabhakar
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, SHANKAR REDDY <
> >> sankara.telukutla@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > '+1
> >> >
> >> > Kind Regards,
> >> > Sankara Telukutla
> >> > +1 510 936 0999
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over
> >>couple
> >> > of
> >> > > meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
> >> > >
> >> > > Developers/Contributors
> >> > >
> >> > > Please share ideas on how you want to do it
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > Venkat
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular
> >> community
> >> > > >contributor sync ups :)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Jarcec
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> >> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> >> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> >> > > >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some
> >> > folks
> >> > > >> +are in China :)
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Regards
> >> > > >> Richard
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> >> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> >> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> +1
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
> >> > > >><vb...@cloudera.com>
> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> +1. Love to.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Regards
> >> > > >>> Veena
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >> > > >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> >> > > >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a
> >> good
> >> > > >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> >> > > >>>> every other
> >> > > >>> week
> >> > > >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> What do you guys think?
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Thanks
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Venkat
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Venkat,
It has been about a week since the last member of the community has added
to this thread. Let's set a date and location?
-Abe
On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 7:46 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks Arvind for chiming in! I wanted to make sure we get an idea from
> the contributors
> About the mechanics before we write up a proposal and vote on it.
> +1 for having a process along the lines outlined below.
>
>
> Venkat
>
>
>
>
> On 2/18/15, 1:50 PM, "Ahmed Radwan" <ah...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >Thanks Arvind! +1 for following this process.
> >
> >On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> While I appreciate the enthusiasm of folks on this thread who would
> >>like to
> >> see such calls/meetings happen - I am a bit wary for the reasons noted
> >> below.
> >>
> >> Those of us who were on the Sqoop PMC during mid-2012 will recall that
> >>the
> >> project did such meetings before too. They will also recall that it
> >>raised
> >> some questions from the board regarding the conduct of these meetings.
> >> Specifically - to ensure that anyone from anywhere could join the calls,
> >> that no decisions were made on these calls, and that important
> >>discussions
> >> that sparked off in the call be brought back to the mailing list for
> >> further continuation and conclusion. Thanks to the members of the Sqoop
> >>PMC
> >> at that time, we followed this with due diligence and were able to
> >>ensure
> >> that these conditions were adequately met. The specifics of the process
> >>at
> >> that time were as follows:
> >>
> >> 1. A one-week notice for the meetings (eg [1]), using a system that
> >>allowed
> >> easy participation from anywhere in the world. At that time we were
> >>using
> >> WebEx call bridge that provided toll-free access numbers for various
> >> countries. The announcement was also posted on the JIRA being discussed
> >>in
> >> these meetings (eg [2])
> >>
> >> 2. The meeting minutes were sent out on the email list (eg [3]), and
> >> recorded on the wiki for posterity (eg [4]).
> >>
> >> 3. Any actionable items discussed were brought back to the Jira with
> >>full
> >> context and follow-up through the regular mailing-list/Jira resolution
> >> process (eg [5]).
> >>
> >> That was done in mid-2012. If we were to do this now, I would request
> >>the
> >> PMC to follow the process diligently to ensure that it stays open,
> >> transparent, and inclusive to the broader community that Sqoop has. To
> >>that
> >> affect, I would request the champions of these meetings to first
> >>document
> >> the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put
> >>it to
> >> a vote for approval.
> >>
> >> [1] http://s.apache.org/9tF
> >> [2] http://s.apache.org/Pzb
> >> [3] http://s.apache.org/Map
> >> [4]
> >>
> >>
> >>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Weekly+Meeting+M
> >>inutes
> >> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-491
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Arvind Prabhakar
> >>
> >> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, SHANKAR REDDY <
> >> sankara.telukutla@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >> > '+1
> >> >
> >> > Kind Regards,
> >> > Sankara Telukutla
> >> > +1 510 936 0999
> >> >
> >> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over
> >>couple
> >> > of
> >> > > meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
> >> > >
> >> > > Developers/Contributors
> >> > >
> >> > > Please share ideas on how you want to do it
> >> > >
> >> > > Thanks
> >> > > Venkat
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > > >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular
> >> community
> >> > > >contributor sync ups :)
> >> > > >
> >> > > >Jarcec
> >> > > >
> >> > > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> >> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> >> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> >> > > >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some
> >> > folks
> >> > > >> +are in China :)
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> Regards
> >> > > >> Richard
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> >> > > >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> >> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> >> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> >> > > >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> +1
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
> >> > > >><vb...@cloudera.com>
> >> > > >> wrote:
> >> > > >>
> >> > > >>> +1. Love to.
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> Regards
> >> > > >>> Veena
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >> > > >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> >> > > >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a
> >> good
> >> > > >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> >> > > >>>> every other
> >> > > >>> week
> >> > > >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> What do you guys think?
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Thanks
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>> Venkat
> >> > > >>>>
> >> > > >>>
> >> > > >
> >> > >
> >> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks Arvind for chiming in! I wanted to make sure we get an idea from
the contributors
About the mechanics before we write up a proposal and vote on it.
+1 for having a process along the lines outlined below.
Venkat
On 2/18/15, 1:50 PM, "Ahmed Radwan" <ah...@apache.org> wrote:
>Thanks Arvind! +1 for following this process.
>
>On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>
>wrote:
>
>> While I appreciate the enthusiasm of folks on this thread who would
>>like to
>> see such calls/meetings happen - I am a bit wary for the reasons noted
>> below.
>>
>> Those of us who were on the Sqoop PMC during mid-2012 will recall that
>>the
>> project did such meetings before too. They will also recall that it
>>raised
>> some questions from the board regarding the conduct of these meetings.
>> Specifically - to ensure that anyone from anywhere could join the calls,
>> that no decisions were made on these calls, and that important
>>discussions
>> that sparked off in the call be brought back to the mailing list for
>> further continuation and conclusion. Thanks to the members of the Sqoop
>>PMC
>> at that time, we followed this with due diligence and were able to
>>ensure
>> that these conditions were adequately met. The specifics of the process
>>at
>> that time were as follows:
>>
>> 1. A one-week notice for the meetings (eg [1]), using a system that
>>allowed
>> easy participation from anywhere in the world. At that time we were
>>using
>> WebEx call bridge that provided toll-free access numbers for various
>> countries. The announcement was also posted on the JIRA being discussed
>>in
>> these meetings (eg [2])
>>
>> 2. The meeting minutes were sent out on the email list (eg [3]), and
>> recorded on the wiki for posterity (eg [4]).
>>
>> 3. Any actionable items discussed were brought back to the Jira with
>>full
>> context and follow-up through the regular mailing-list/Jira resolution
>> process (eg [5]).
>>
>> That was done in mid-2012. If we were to do this now, I would request
>>the
>> PMC to follow the process diligently to ensure that it stays open,
>> transparent, and inclusive to the broader community that Sqoop has. To
>>that
>> affect, I would request the champions of these meetings to first
>>document
>> the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put
>>it to
>> a vote for approval.
>>
>> [1] http://s.apache.org/9tF
>> [2] http://s.apache.org/Pzb
>> [3] http://s.apache.org/Map
>> [4]
>>
>>
>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Weekly+Meeting+M
>>inutes
>> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-491
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arvind Prabhakar
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, SHANKAR REDDY <
>> sankara.telukutla@gmail.com
>> > wrote:
>>
>> > '+1
>> >
>> > Kind Regards,
>> > Sankara Telukutla
>> > +1 510 936 0999
>> >
>> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over
>>couple
>> > of
>> > > meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
>> > >
>> > > Developers/Contributors
>> > >
>> > > Please share ideas on how you want to do it
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> > > Venkat
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular
>> community
>> > > >contributor sync ups :)
>> > > >
>> > > >Jarcec
>> > > >
>> > > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
>> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
>> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
>> > > >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
>> > > >>
>> > > >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some
>> > folks
>> > > >> +are in China :)
>> > > >>
>> > > >>
>> > > >> Regards
>> > > >> Richard
>> > > >>
>> > > >> -----Original Message-----
>> > > >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
>> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
>> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
>> > > >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
>> > > >>
>> > > >> +1
>> > > >>
>> > > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
>> > > >><vb...@cloudera.com>
>> > > >> wrote:
>> > > >>
>> > > >>> +1. Love to.
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> Regards
>> > > >>> Veena
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> > > >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> > > >>>
>> > > >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
>> > > >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a
>> good
>> > > >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
>> > > >>>> every other
>> > > >>> week
>> > > >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> What do you guys think?
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Thanks
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>> Venkat
>> > > >>>>
>> > > >>>
>> > > >
>> > >
>> >
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Ahmed Radwan <ah...@apache.org>.
Thanks Arvind! +1 for following this process.
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org> wrote:
> While I appreciate the enthusiasm of folks on this thread who would like to
> see such calls/meetings happen - I am a bit wary for the reasons noted
> below.
>
> Those of us who were on the Sqoop PMC during mid-2012 will recall that the
> project did such meetings before too. They will also recall that it raised
> some questions from the board regarding the conduct of these meetings.
> Specifically - to ensure that anyone from anywhere could join the calls,
> that no decisions were made on these calls, and that important discussions
> that sparked off in the call be brought back to the mailing list for
> further continuation and conclusion. Thanks to the members of the Sqoop PMC
> at that time, we followed this with due diligence and were able to ensure
> that these conditions were adequately met. The specifics of the process at
> that time were as follows:
>
> 1. A one-week notice for the meetings (eg [1]), using a system that allowed
> easy participation from anywhere in the world. At that time we were using
> WebEx call bridge that provided toll-free access numbers for various
> countries. The announcement was also posted on the JIRA being discussed in
> these meetings (eg [2])
>
> 2. The meeting minutes were sent out on the email list (eg [3]), and
> recorded on the wiki for posterity (eg [4]).
>
> 3. Any actionable items discussed were brought back to the Jira with full
> context and follow-up through the regular mailing-list/Jira resolution
> process (eg [5]).
>
> That was done in mid-2012. If we were to do this now, I would request the
> PMC to follow the process diligently to ensure that it stays open,
> transparent, and inclusive to the broader community that Sqoop has. To that
> affect, I would request the champions of these meetings to first document
> the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put it to
> a vote for approval.
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/9tF
> [2] http://s.apache.org/Pzb
> [3] http://s.apache.org/Map
> [4]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Weekly+Meeting+Minutes
> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-491
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, SHANKAR REDDY <
> sankara.telukutla@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > '+1
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Sankara Telukutla
> > +1 510 936 0999
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over couple
> > of
> > > meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
> > >
> > > Developers/Contributors
> > >
> > > Please share ideas on how you want to do it
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Venkat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular
> community
> > > >contributor sync ups :)
> > > >
> > > >Jarcec
> > > >
> > > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
> > > >>
> > > >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some
> > folks
> > > >> +are in China :)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Richard
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
> > > >><vb...@cloudera.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1. Love to.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards
> > > >>> Veena
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > > >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> > > >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a
> good
> > > >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> > > >>>> every other
> > > >>> week
> > > >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> What do you guys think?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Venkat
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
This makes complete sense to me and I'm still +1 w/ the process Arvind
outlined.
If a place w/ stable internet and a webex bridge is needed, we could have
the meeting at Cloudera's offices in Palo Alto or San Francisco.
-Abe
On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:57 AM, Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org> wrote:
> While I appreciate the enthusiasm of folks on this thread who would like to
> see such calls/meetings happen - I am a bit wary for the reasons noted
> below.
>
> Those of us who were on the Sqoop PMC during mid-2012 will recall that the
> project did such meetings before too. They will also recall that it raised
> some questions from the board regarding the conduct of these meetings.
> Specifically - to ensure that anyone from anywhere could join the calls,
> that no decisions were made on these calls, and that important discussions
> that sparked off in the call be brought back to the mailing list for
> further continuation and conclusion. Thanks to the members of the Sqoop PMC
> at that time, we followed this with due diligence and were able to ensure
> that these conditions were adequately met. The specifics of the process at
> that time were as follows:
>
> 1. A one-week notice for the meetings (eg [1]), using a system that allowed
> easy participation from anywhere in the world. At that time we were using
> WebEx call bridge that provided toll-free access numbers for various
> countries. The announcement was also posted on the JIRA being discussed in
> these meetings (eg [2])
>
> 2. The meeting minutes were sent out on the email list (eg [3]), and
> recorded on the wiki for posterity (eg [4]).
>
> 3. Any actionable items discussed were brought back to the Jira with full
> context and follow-up through the regular mailing-list/Jira resolution
> process (eg [5]).
>
> That was done in mid-2012. If we were to do this now, I would request the
> PMC to follow the process diligently to ensure that it stays open,
> transparent, and inclusive to the broader community that Sqoop has. To that
> affect, I would request the champions of these meetings to first document
> the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put it to
> a vote for approval.
>
> [1] http://s.apache.org/9tF
> [2] http://s.apache.org/Pzb
> [3] http://s.apache.org/Map
> [4]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Weekly+Meeting+Minutes
> [5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-491
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, SHANKAR REDDY <
> sankara.telukutla@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > '+1
> >
> > Kind Regards,
> > Sankara Telukutla
> > +1 510 936 0999
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over couple
> > of
> > > meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
> > >
> > > Developers/Contributors
> > >
> > > Please share ideas on how you want to do it
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > > Venkat
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular
> community
> > > >contributor sync ups :)
> > > >
> > > >Jarcec
> > > >
> > > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com>
> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
> > > >>
> > > >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some
> > folks
> > > >> +are in China :)
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Regards
> > > >> Richard
> > > >>
> > > >> -----Original Message-----
> > > >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> > > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> > > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > > >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
> > > >>
> > > >> +1
> > > >>
> > > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
> > > >><vb...@cloudera.com>
> > > >> wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>> +1. Love to.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Regards
> > > >>> Veena
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > > >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > > >>>
> > > >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> > > >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a
> good
> > > >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> > > >>>> every other
> > > >>> week
> > > >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> What do you guys think?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Thanks
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Venkat
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
While I appreciate the enthusiasm of folks on this thread who would like to
see such calls/meetings happen - I am a bit wary for the reasons noted
below.
Those of us who were on the Sqoop PMC during mid-2012 will recall that the
project did such meetings before too. They will also recall that it raised
some questions from the board regarding the conduct of these meetings.
Specifically - to ensure that anyone from anywhere could join the calls,
that no decisions were made on these calls, and that important discussions
that sparked off in the call be brought back to the mailing list for
further continuation and conclusion. Thanks to the members of the Sqoop PMC
at that time, we followed this with due diligence and were able to ensure
that these conditions were adequately met. The specifics of the process at
that time were as follows:
1. A one-week notice for the meetings (eg [1]), using a system that allowed
easy participation from anywhere in the world. At that time we were using
WebEx call bridge that provided toll-free access numbers for various
countries. The announcement was also posted on the JIRA being discussed in
these meetings (eg [2])
2. The meeting minutes were sent out on the email list (eg [3]), and
recorded on the wiki for posterity (eg [4]).
3. Any actionable items discussed were brought back to the Jira with full
context and follow-up through the regular mailing-list/Jira resolution
process (eg [5]).
That was done in mid-2012. If we were to do this now, I would request the
PMC to follow the process diligently to ensure that it stays open,
transparent, and inclusive to the broader community that Sqoop has. To that
affect, I would request the champions of these meetings to first document
the full process on the wiki, discuss it on the mailing list, and put it to
a vote for approval.
[1] http://s.apache.org/9tF
[2] http://s.apache.org/Pzb
[3] http://s.apache.org/Map
[4]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SQOOP/Sqoop2+Weekly+Meeting+Minutes
[5] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SQOOP-491
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:31 AM, SHANKAR REDDY <sankara.telukutla@gmail.com
> wrote:
> '+1
>
> Kind Regards,
> Sankara Telukutla
> +1 510 936 0999
>
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over couple
> of
> > meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
> >
> > Developers/Contributors
> >
> > Please share ideas on how you want to do it
> >
> > Thanks
> > Venkat
> >
> >
> >
> > On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular community
> > >contributor sync ups :)
> > >
> > >Jarcec
> > >
> > >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
> > >>
> > >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some
> folks
> > >> +are in China :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >> Richard
> > >>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> > >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> > >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
> > >>
> > >> +1
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
> > >><vb...@cloudera.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >>> +1. Love to.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Regards
> > >>> Veena
> > >>>
> > >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> > >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> > >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good
> > >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> > >>>> every other
> > >>> week
> > >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> What do you guys think?
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Thanks
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Venkat
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >
> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by SHANKAR REDDY <sa...@gmail.com>.
'+1
Kind Regards,
Sankara Telukutla
+1 510 936 0999
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:44 AM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over couple of
> meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
>
> Developers/Contributors
>
> Please share ideas on how you want to do it
>
> Thanks
> Venkat
>
>
>
> On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular community
> >contributor sync ups :)
> >
> >Jarcec
> >
> >> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> >> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
> >>
> >> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some folks
> >> +are in China :)
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards
> >> Richard
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> >> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> >> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
> >>
> >> +1
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
> >><vb...@cloudera.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1. Love to.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards
> >>> Veena
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Sqoop developers
> >>>>
> >>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> >>>> meetings to discuss issues.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good
> >>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> >>>> every other
> >>> week
> >>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> >>>>
> >>>> What do you guys think?
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks
> >>>>
> >>>> Venkat
> >>>>
> >>>
> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks Jarcec. In fact myself and Jarcec spoke about this over couple of
meetings also. Let us get the mechanics in order!
Developers/Contributors
Please share ideas on how you want to do it
Thanks
Venkat
On 2/16/15, 7:08 AM, "Jarek Jarcec Cecho" <ja...@apache.org> wrote:
>This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular community
>contributor sync ups :)
>
>Jarcec
>
>> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com> wrote:
>>
>> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
>> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
>> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
>>
>> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some folks
>> +are in China :)
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Richard
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
>> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
>> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
>>
>> +1
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj
>><vb...@cloudera.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1. Love to.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>> Veena
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Sqoop developers
>>>>
>>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
>>>> meetings to discuss issues.
>>>>
>>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good
>>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
>>>> every other
>>> week
>>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
>>>>
>>>> What do you guys think?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>>
>>>> Venkat
>>>>
>>>
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Jarek Jarcec Cecho <ja...@apache.org>.
This is a wonderful idea Venkat, I’m strong +1 to have regular community contributor sync ups :)
Jarcec
> On Feb 12, 2015, at 11:24 PM, Xu, Qian A <qi...@intel.com> wrote:
>
> Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
>
> +1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some folks
> +are in China :)
>
>
> Regards
> Richard
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
> To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
>
> +1
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj <vb...@cloudera.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1. Love to.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Regards
>> Veena
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Sqoop developers
>>>
>>> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
>>> meetings to discuss issues.
>>>
>>> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good
>>> time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
>>> every other
>> week
>>> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
>>>
>>> What do you guys think?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Venkat
>>>
>>
RE: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by "Xu, Qian A" <qi...@intel.com>.
Oh yes. Chinese people are in GMT+8
-----Original Message-----
From: Zhou, Richard [mailto:richard.zhou@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:27 AM
To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
Subject: RE: Sqoop developer meetings
+1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some folks
+are in China :)
Regards
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
+1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj <vb...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> +1. Love to.
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Veena
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sqoop developers
> >
> > Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> > meetings to discuss issues.
> >
> > I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good
> > time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> > every other
> week
> > or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Venkat
> >
>
RE: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by "Zhou, Richard" <ri...@intel.com>.
+1, one suggestion, we should choose a good time slot, since some folks are in China :)
Regards
Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Abraham Elmahrek [mailto:abe@cloudera.com]
Sent: Friday, February 13, 2015 9:24 AM
To: dev@sqoop.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sqoop developer meetings
+1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj <vb...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> +1. Love to.
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Veena
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sqoop developers
> >
> > Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off
> > meetings to discuss issues.
> >
> > I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good
> > time to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled
> > every other
> week
> > or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Venkat
> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
+1
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:06 PM, Veena Basavaraj <vb...@cloudera.com>
wrote:
> +1. Love to.
>
>
>
>
> Regards
> Veena
>
> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi Sqoop developers
> >
> > Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off meetings
> > to discuss issues.
> >
> > I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good time
> > to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled every other
> week
> > or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
> >
> > What do you guys think?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Venkat
> >
>
Re: Sqoop developer meetings
Posted by Veena Basavaraj <vb...@cloudera.com>.
+1. Love to.
Regards
Veena
On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 5:05 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Hi Sqoop developers
>
> Over the years I have been involved here, we have had one off meetings
> to discuss issues.
>
> I think with the rapid clip of progress going on, it might be a good time
> to think about having more regular meetings (say scheduled every other week
> or once a month) to discuss Sqoop development tasks.
>
> What do you guys think?
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>