You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@flex.apache.org by Fuad Kamal <fu...@anaara.com> on 2013/10/04 01:06:29 UTC
Fwd: users Digest 3 Oct 2013 22:50:46 -0000 Issue 287
> From: Fuad Kamal <fu...@anaara.com>
> Subject: Re: users Digest 3 Oct 2013 22:50:46 -0000 Issue 287
> Date: October 3, 2013 7:04:15 PM EDT
> To: users-digest@flex.apache.org
>
> ok, thanks. I am working on a multicast-capable video player for a client based on David Hassoun's REOPS player. I'll let you know if I run into any issues using the latest OSMF build with the current Apache Flex SDK.
>
> Fuad Kamal
> Anaara LLC
> www.anaara.com
> 240.515.7578 (m)
> 214.279.1890 (f)
> twitter: @flexRonin
> linkedIn: linkedin.com/in/anaara
> photography:
> http://500px.com/fuad2
>
> On Oct 3, 2013, at 6:50 PM, users-digest-help@flex.apache.org wrote:
>
>> On 10/2/13 7:46 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wednesday, October 2, 2013, Fuad Kamal wrote:
>>>
>>>> If we are using a fresh build of OSMF in our flex projects, is it
>>>> necessary to delete the OSMF swc from the Apache Flex framework
>>>> (/frameworks/libs/osmf.swf), or will the compiler be smart enough to
>>>> know
>>>> to prefer the OSMF swc in the project libs folder over the one in the
>>>> SDK?
>>>> Any particular reason why the latest SDK uses such an old build of OSMF
>>>> (pre-dating multicast capabilities)?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I don't think there is any particular reason. We should be able to
>>> bump up the downloaded osmf version.
>> Fuad, the reason is that it is the version Adobe certified with Adobe Flex
>> 4.6. Upgrading to the newer one may result in unexpected results. If you
>> can help us out by testing the newer version, then that might help us
>> determine that it is safe to make that the new default.
>>
>> The compiler should pick up both SWCs and use the time stamps in the
>> catalog.xml in the SWC and choose the newer one. There is a chance that
>> an old version was re-compiled more recently than a new version in order
>> to slipstream some bug fix or if you built it yourself from sources. But
>> usually it works as expected.
>>
>> -Alex
>