You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@hyrumwright.org> on 2009/10/07 12:03:42 UTC
Re: 1.6.6 on Oct. 14
On Sep 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> It's that time again: time for another great-tasting release of
> Subversion! This one will be baked on Oct. 14 as Subversion 1.6.6.
> Get your nominations and votes in, to help make this the best release
> yet.
>
> [ Note to translators, et. al.: I'm not sure what time on Oct. 14 the
> 1.6.6 tarball will roll, but you can safely assume that it will be
> after 0000 UTC. In other words, if your translations and other
> updates are on the branch by the end of the day on Oct. 13, you've
> nothing to fear about missing the deadline. The same applies for
> votes and nominations in STATUS. ]
T minus 6.5 days, and counting.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2404480
Re: ruby test failure, 1.6.6 roll on hold (was Re: 1.6.6 on Oct.
14)
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Oct 14, 2009, at 1:48 PM, Mark Phippard wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <hyrum@hyrumwright.org
> > wrote:
>> On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>>> On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sep 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> It's that time again: time for another great-tasting release of
>>>>> Subversion! This one will be baked on Oct. 14 as Subversion
>>>>> 1.6.6.
>>>>> Get your nominations and votes in, to help make this the best
>>>>> release
>>>>> yet.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ Note to translators, et. al.: I'm not sure what time on Oct. 14
>>>>> the
>>>>> 1.6.6 tarball will roll, but you can safely assume that it will be
>>>>> after 0000 UTC. In other words, if your translations and other
>>>>> updates are on the branch by the end of the day on Oct. 13, you've
>>>>> nothing to fear about missing the deadline. The same applies for
>>>>> votes and nominations in STATUS. ]
>>>>
>>>> T minus 6.5 days, and counting.
>>>
>>> One more reminder: I'll be rolling 1.6.6 sometime after 0000 UTC on
>>> Oct. 14. It may be several hours later, but any changes approved in
>>> STATUS and translations on the 1.6.x branch are guaranteed to be in
>>> the release.
>>>
>>> Please nominate, review and vote on items in STATUS in the next
>>> couple
>>> of days.
>>
>> Getting ready to roll the tarball, I ran 'make check-swig-rb' on the
>> 1.6.x branch. I get the following segfault:
>>
>> test_merge(SvnClientTest): /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/
>> bindings/swig/ruby/test/my-assertions.rb:31: [BUG] Segmentation fault
>> ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [x86_64-linux]
>>
>> I'm planning on holding the roll until we determine the status of
>> this
>> bug.
>
> I am not getting this problem. But I did have a test failure. I do
> not know that this same failure did not also happen with other 1.6.x
> releases:
>
> Started
> ...............................................................................................F
> ...........................................................................................................................
> Finished in 535.915051 seconds.
>
> 1) Failure:
> test_mime_type_detect_with_type_map(SvnCoreTest)
> [/Users/mphippard/work/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/
> test_core.rb:631]:
> <Svn::Error::BadFilename> exception expected but none was thrown.
>
> 219 tests, 1483 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors
Digging further, I see the following:
test_merge(SvnClientTest):
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
[Switching to Thread 0x7fad06c586f0 (LWP 13356)]
0x00007fad0151cf46 in apr_hash_next (hi=0x1a01210) at tables/
apr_hash.c:128
128 hi->this = hi->ht->array[hi->index++];
(gdb) backtrace
#0 0x00007fad0151cf46 in apr_hash_next (hi=0x1a01210) at tables/
apr_hash.c:128
#1 0x00007fad051449c9 in c2r_hash_with_key_convert (hash=0x1a01200,
key_conv=0x7fad05142edc <c2r_string>, key_ctx=0x0,
value_conv=0x7fad05142c0f <svn_swig_rb_from_swig_type>,
value_ctx=0x7fad053a5348)
at subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/libsvn_swig_ruby/swigutil_rb.c:
1409
#2 0x00007fad05144a7c in c2r_hash (hash=0x1a01200,
value_conv=0x7fad05142c0f <svn_swig_rb_from_swig_type>,
ctx=0x7fad053a5348)
at subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/libsvn_swig_ruby/swigutil_rb.c:
1429
#3 0x00007fad05144ae8 in svn_swig_rb_apr_hash_to_hash_swig_type
(hash=0x1a01200,
type_name=0x7fad053a5348 "svn_log_changed_path_t *")
at subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/libsvn_swig_ruby/swigutil_rb.c:
1447
#4 0x00007fad05364a00 in _wrap_svn_log_entry_t_changed_paths_get
(argc=0,
argv=0x0, self=140381006173800) at subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/
core.c:5171
#5 0x00007fad06791c40 in rb_call0 (klass=140381119398840,
recv=140381006173800,
id=16729, oid=16729, argc=0, argv=0x0, body=0x7fad06c131e8,
flags=<value optimized out>) at eval.c:5904
#6 0x00007fad06791dfa in rb_call (klass=140381119398840,
recv=140381006173800,
mid=16729, argc=0, argv=0x0, scope=0, self=140381005113880) at
eval.c:6151
#7 0x00007fad0678bcf0 in rb_eval (self=140381005113880, n=<value
optimized out>)
at eval.c:3492
...
I can't reproduce this when running the test singly, though.
If others can't reproduce, I'll consider it an anomaly and continue to
roll.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2407696
Re: ruby test failure, 1.6.6 roll on hold (was Re: 1.6.6 on Oct.
14)
Posted by Mark Phippard <ma...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Hyrum K. Wright <hy...@hyrumwright.org> wrote:
> On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
>> On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>>> On Sep 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>>
>>>> It's that time again: time for another great-tasting release of
>>>> Subversion! This one will be baked on Oct. 14 as Subversion 1.6.6.
>>>> Get your nominations and votes in, to help make this the best
>>>> release
>>>> yet.
>>>>
>>>> [ Note to translators, et. al.: I'm not sure what time on Oct. 14
>>>> the
>>>> 1.6.6 tarball will roll, but you can safely assume that it will be
>>>> after 0000 UTC. In other words, if your translations and other
>>>> updates are on the branch by the end of the day on Oct. 13, you've
>>>> nothing to fear about missing the deadline. The same applies for
>>>> votes and nominations in STATUS. ]
>>>
>>> T minus 6.5 days, and counting.
>>
>> One more reminder: I'll be rolling 1.6.6 sometime after 0000 UTC on
>> Oct. 14. It may be several hours later, but any changes approved in
>> STATUS and translations on the 1.6.x branch are guaranteed to be in
>> the release.
>>
>> Please nominate, review and vote on items in STATUS in the next couple
>> of days.
>
> Getting ready to roll the tarball, I ran 'make check-swig-rb' on the
> 1.6.x branch. I get the following segfault:
>
> test_merge(SvnClientTest): /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/
> bindings/swig/ruby/test/my-assertions.rb:31: [BUG] Segmentation fault
> ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [x86_64-linux]
>
> I'm planning on holding the roll until we determine the status of this
> bug.
I am not getting this problem. But I did have a test failure. I do
not know that this same failure did not also happen with other 1.6.x
releases:
Started
...............................................................................................F...........................................................................................................................
Finished in 535.915051 seconds.
1) Failure:
test_mime_type_detect_with_type_map(SvnCoreTest)
[/Users/mphippard/work/svn-1.6.x/subversion/bindings/swig/ruby/test/test_core.rb:631]:
<Svn::Error::BadFilename> exception expected but none was thrown.
219 tests, 1483 assertions, 1 failures, 0 errors
--
Thanks
Mark Phippard
http://markphip.blogspot.com/
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2407694
ruby test failure, 1.6.6 roll on hold (was Re: 1.6.6 on Oct. 14)
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Oct 12, 2009, at 11:28 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
>> On Sep 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>
>>> It's that time again: time for another great-tasting release of
>>> Subversion! This one will be baked on Oct. 14 as Subversion 1.6.6.
>>> Get your nominations and votes in, to help make this the best
>>> release
>>> yet.
>>>
>>> [ Note to translators, et. al.: I'm not sure what time on Oct. 14
>>> the
>>> 1.6.6 tarball will roll, but you can safely assume that it will be
>>> after 0000 UTC. In other words, if your translations and other
>>> updates are on the branch by the end of the day on Oct. 13, you've
>>> nothing to fear about missing the deadline. The same applies for
>>> votes and nominations in STATUS. ]
>>
>> T minus 6.5 days, and counting.
>
> One more reminder: I'll be rolling 1.6.6 sometime after 0000 UTC on
> Oct. 14. It may be several hours later, but any changes approved in
> STATUS and translations on the 1.6.x branch are guaranteed to be in
> the release.
>
> Please nominate, review and vote on items in STATUS in the next couple
> of days.
Getting ready to roll the tarball, I ran 'make check-swig-rb' on the
1.6.x branch. I get the following segfault:
test_merge(SvnClientTest): /home/hwright/dev/svn-1.6.x/subversion/
bindings/swig/ruby/test/my-assertions.rb:31: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.8.7 (2008-08-11 patchlevel 72) [x86_64-linux]
I'm planning on holding the roll until we determine the status of this
bug.
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2407685
Re: 1.6.6 on Oct. 14
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@hyrumwright.org>.
On Oct 7, 2009, at 7:03 AM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
> On Sep 28, 2009, at 1:20 PM, Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>
>> It's that time again: time for another great-tasting release of
>> Subversion! This one will be baked on Oct. 14 as Subversion 1.6.6.
>> Get your nominations and votes in, to help make this the best release
>> yet.
>>
>> [ Note to translators, et. al.: I'm not sure what time on Oct. 14 the
>> 1.6.6 tarball will roll, but you can safely assume that it will be
>> after 0000 UTC. In other words, if your translations and other
>> updates are on the branch by the end of the day on Oct. 13, you've
>> nothing to fear about missing the deadline. The same applies for
>> votes and nominations in STATUS. ]
>
> T minus 6.5 days, and counting.
One more reminder: I'll be rolling 1.6.6 sometime after 0000 UTC on
Oct. 14. It may be several hours later, but any changes approved in
STATUS and translations on the 1.6.x branch are guaranteed to be in
the release.
Please nominate, review and vote on items in STATUS in the next couple
of days.
Thanks,
-Hyrum
------------------------------------------------------
http://subversion.tigris.org/ds/viewMessage.do?dsForumId=462&dsMessageId=2406726