Re: Keeping up with Toby :)

[Martin Gilday <ma...@imap.cc>]

I've contacted Toby to see what he considers the greatest changes he has
made to WW recently.  Below is the list he replied with.  

I have had a crack at WW-1485, which alreadt existed as WW-2294. As it
is really more of a XWork issue I have created
http://jira.opensymphony.com/browse/XW-593
I've ported over the test Toby made as well and all are still passing. 
If someone could give it a quick look that would be great.  There were
just a couple of files I was unsure of, and listed on the JIRA issue.

WW-1466 (Updgrate Ognl dependency to 2.7 for WebWork 2.2.6 release)  //
DONE
WW-1485 (Parameterizing i18n messages) // WW-2294 + XW-593
WW-1453 (customOnSubmit_parameters​.id() function name cause
problem when parameters.id contains forbidden characters)
WW-1456 (IE not friendly to SSL headers in JasperReportsResult)
WW-1475 (ChainingInterceptor does not properly parse the incoming
included or excluded methods)
WW-1489 (Handling of unchecked checkboxes) //DONE?


----- Original message -----
From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 09:40:33 -0500
Subject: Re: Keeping up with Toby :)

That would be great, Wes. There's plenty to go around.

On Nov 30, 2007 9:21 AM, Wes Wannemacher <we...@wantii.com> wrote:
> Ted,
>
> I'd like to take a crack at this one. I am not a committer, but I've
> worked in both the s2 and xwork2 codebase.
>
> -Wes
>
>
> On 11/30/07, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > I'd also suggest focusing on the 2.1.x head, rather than worrying
> > about backporting to the 2.0.x branch, unless of course it's something
> > so nasty that we should roll a 2.0.12 release.
> >
> > We're probably in good shape for 2.1.x. I believe it's mainly a matter
> > of catching up on the patches and wrapping up the CodeBehind/SmartURLs
> > merger.
> >
> > -T.
> >
> > On Nov 30, 2007 8:43 AM, Ted Husted <hu...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > Sure. Just try to see if there is already a matching ticket. Phil
> > > created a few during the transition period that might still be open.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Nov 30, 2007 8:15 AM, Martin Gilday <ma...@imap.cc> wrote:
> > > > Should we just create a matching Struts 2 JIRA issue, linking to the WW
> > > > one and attach the patch there?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original message -----
> > > > From: "Ted Husted" <hu...@apache.org>
> > > > To: "Struts Developers List" <de...@struts.apache.org>
> > > > Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 07:50:05 -0500
> > > > Subject: Keeping up with Toby :)
> > > >
> > > > Our good friend Toby (tm_jee) has been closing a lot of tickets on the
> > > > WebWork side. I expect that some of these could be ported to Struts 2.
> > > > If anyone is looking for an opportunity to learn more about Struts 2,
> > > > we could use volunteers to review Toby's WW patches and port them to
> > > > S2. Of course, if the volunteer were not a committer, I'd be happy to
> > > > apply the patches on this side (though, I can't promise same day
> > > > service!).
> > > >
> > > > -Ted.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@struts.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@struts.apache.org