You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ofbiz.apache.org by "Jacques Le Roux (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/09/29 09:34:33 UTC

[jira] [Comment Edited] (OFBIZ-3329) commonext component has dependency on party management component

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3329?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14151214#comment-14151214 ] 

Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-3329 at 9/29/14 7:33 AM:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Quoting [~diveshdut] on dev ML
{quote}
Today we looked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3329 . Its 5 years old issue. OFBiz community have put lots of efforts in moving some of the components in special-purose. Did we conclude any thing about “commonext” component in “applications”  ? I think its more of demo component to show how can you extend any application in OFBiz. 

Is commonest component is  good candidate for moving in special-purpose folder ?
{quote}


I thought the commonext component was put by Hans for the Setup component (I know it's used by it). But it seems it was really committed (at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=748144) as a "common component for applications". 

I know this component is also used by other applications components and I see not need to remove it but dependencies to it from framework should be removed of course, as dependencies from it to other applicationd component, though this is IMO less an issue, since we tolerate dependency between applications component


was (Author: jacques.le.roux):
Quoting Deepak on dev ML
{quote}
Today we looked in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3329 . Its 5 years old issue. OFBiz community have put lots of efforts in moving some of the components in special-purose. Did we conclude any thing about “commonext” component in “applications”  ? I think its more of demo component to show how can you extend any application in OFBiz. 

Is commonest component is  good candidate for moving in special-purpose folder ?
{quote}


I thought the commonext component was put by Hans for the Setup component (I know it's used by it). But it seems it was really committed (at http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=748144) as a "common component for applications". 

I know this component is also used by other applications components and I see not need to remove it but dependencies to it from framework should be removed of course, as dependencies from it to other applicationd component, though this is IMO less an issue, since we tolerate dependency between applications component

> commonext component has dependency on party management component
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OFBIZ-3329
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-3329
>             Project: OFBiz
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: commonext/setup
>    Affects Versions: Trunk
>            Reporter: chris snow
>
> I've just tried commenting out all components except commonext on trunk (i.e. in component-load.xml).
> I  ran the ant tasks create-admin-user-login, then run and then tried to
> access the url https://localhost:8443/webtools/
> I received the following error message:
>     org.ofbiz.widget.screen.ScreenRenderException: Error rendering
> screen [component://common/widget/CommonScreens.xml#GlobalDecorator]:
> org.ofbiz.base.util.GeneralException: Error running Groovy script at
> location [component://commonext/script/changeOrgPartyId.groovy] (Could
> not find definition for entity name PartyAcctgPrefAndGroup) (Error
> running Groovy script at location
> [component://commonext/script/changeOrgPartyId.groovy] (Could not find
> definition for entity name PartyAcctgPrefAndGroup))
> It seems that commonext has a dependency on the party component.  I'm not sure is this is an issue - is there any guidelines on what dependencies can go in commonext?



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)