Tests

["eberhard speer jr." <se...@ducis.net>]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Just for fun I made a VB.Net version of the C# code -- also CLS
(ISO/IEC 23271:2012) complaint.
Truth be told, I'm more comfortable with VB.Net. It showed in the C#
version, so today I removed those shocking/offending bits ;-)

Both compiled DLLs obviously produce identical results, except that
the VB.Net version is faster, coming in consistently at 0.08 ms per
ua-string compared to C#'s 0.11 ms !
A compiler thing, for sure.
So, I'll be using the version compiled from VB.Net, thank you :-)

Anyway, having reached around 96% match with the results from the
'old' resolver, I think we should stop comparing, seeing as we now
know the differences are either due to 'faulty' builder-resource
patterns or bugs in the old resolver.

Enjoy the rest of the weekend,

esjr
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR4dWeAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcs1sIAJbyoDNSqRu3xGtPYGKO7FHa
33qCc/WdD0XFdEs+twE+OqBKGvxmM9H+zBb1p+xDAd17e/Qssvy1Bb4ItyE5ray8
cmITtMmBVVeLEeViLGSMLVq48cHiHBEINS+V2ovNF0qY+LT17/D4DjmsTchyYWfP
vaMz1vUBHi33MK49wF6b0UxVyU9fVthOPkBTv1YQa6MlNKYuCgMtcOfAI84ZxrEv
F7uSDIIRZVz9d1FLijP1wAbtMofuRgioHLspkObgWGNqqG4uqQBzPvjbYVK+++4k
9USI4TV7cpgJnxpCZkJPoQNwB/e39XRm0FX4YAtENSvRoMmO5k9OYzDVtQ5jsPs=
=PcmW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----