SOAP as RPC?

[sac vish <xm...@hotmail.com>]

Soap Gurus,
We want to use SOAP as RPC mechanism between set of indepdently running 
applications. What I found with Apache SOAP is our registerd class (web 
service) gets instantiated by Java reflection and runs under web server 
process. So there is need to have some interprocess mechanism between this 
registered class and actual application. This again brings RMI/CORBA/Sockets 
into picture. We started looking into SOAP to get rid of all these 
technoloiges. But apprently it is not happening.
Am I missing something here? Could u suggest any other implementation where 
I can do RPC without use of any of these technologies?

Thanks
Sac
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com

Re: SOAP as RPC?

[Scott Nichol <sn...@computer.org>]

Look at GLUE, a free download from http://www.themindelectric.com.
It has a built-in HTTP server and servlet engine.

Scott

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "sac vish" <xm...@hotmail.com>
To: <so...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 5:13 PM
Subject: SOAP as RPC?


> Soap Gurus,
> We want to use SOAP as RPC mechanism between set of indepdently running 
> applications. What I found with Apache SOAP is our registerd class (web 
> service) gets instantiated by Java reflection and runs under web server 
> process. So there is need to have some interprocess mechanism between this 
> registered class and actual application. This again brings RMI/CORBA/Sockets 
> into picture. We started looking into SOAP to get rid of all these 
> technoloiges. But apprently it is not happening.
> Am I missing something here? Could u suggest any other implementation where 
> I can do RPC without use of any of these technologies?
> 
> Thanks
> Sac
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
> 

versus

[graham glass <gr...@mindspring.com>]

hi guys,

should structures be encoded using <all> or <sequence>?

cheers,
graham