You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@buildr.apache.org by Magnus Rundberget <mr...@hotmail.com> on 2010/06/24 14:54:20 UTC
buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Hi,
I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ?
kind regards
Magnus
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Posted by Magnus Rundberget <mr...@hotmail.com>.
Should I file a jira/issue for the junit-ant-integration ? Maybe the slowdown is due to changes in ant-junit-1.8.0/1.8.1 on how one should best invoke it ?
I have been testing out gradle for the same build as the one I used as an example for buildr.Out of curiosity I tried downgrading gradles bundled ant(1.8.1 to 1.7.1) to see if I could gain any performance improvement, but it didn´t seem to make any difference there.
I´ve read several postings on people complaining about the ant junit performance after upgrading to version 1.8.0...
cheersMagnus
> From: mrundberget@hotmail.com
> To: users@buildr.apache.org
> Subject: RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:19:00 +0000
>
>
> Changed ant version to 1.7.1 in ant.rb for buildr 1.4.0 and voila 36 seconds for the build :-) I.e approx the same as for buildr 1.3.5
>
>
>
> cheers
>
> Magnus
>
>
>
>
>
> > From: mrundberget@hotmail.com
> > To: users@buildr.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> > Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:19:38 +0000
> >
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > Thx for swift reply!
> >
> >
> >
> > I timestamped the log output and it appears that running junit-tests in one of the subprojects is significantly slower with buildr 1.4.0.
> >
> > 3 seconds with buildr 1.3.5, 16 seconds with buildr 1.4.0.
> >
> >
> >
> > Many of the tests are failing (130 of 200), so I'm running with :fail_on_failure=>false. (The tests are failing because I haven't ported our custom mocking framework using aspects yet).
> >
> >
> >
> > So it appears running tests with junit might be an area to investigate further.
> >
> >
> >
> > cheers
> >
> > Magnus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:23:50 -0700
> > > Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> > > From: alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> > > To: users@buildr.apache.org
> > >
> > > I haven't noticed any slowdown myself but I'm not building big projects much
> > > these days.
> > >
> > > The issue could be Buildr itself or any one of our dependencies. There were
> > > many upgrades in the 1.3.5 -> 1.4.0 transition. To make this actionable,
> > > you would have to identify whether it happens in a specific part of the
> > > build (e.g. a specific project, a specific task like junit testing, ...) or
> > > whether it's just general slowness (not tied to any specific part).
> > >
> > > alex
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Magnus Rundberget
> > > <mr...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr
> > > > 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
> > > >
> > > > On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the
> > > > build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
> > > >
> > > > Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ?
> > > >
> > > > kind regards
> > > > Magnus
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> > > > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> > > >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
_________________________________________________________________
Your E-mail and More On-the-Go. Get Windows Live Hotmail Free.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Posted by Magnus Rundberget <mr...@hotmail.com>.
Changed ant version to 1.7.1 in ant.rb for buildr 1.4.0 and voila 36 seconds for the build :-) I.e approx the same as for buildr 1.3.5
cheers
Magnus
> From: mrundberget@hotmail.com
> To: users@buildr.apache.org
> Subject: RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 11:19:38 +0000
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> Thx for swift reply!
>
>
>
> I timestamped the log output and it appears that running junit-tests in one of the subprojects is significantly slower with buildr 1.4.0.
>
> 3 seconds with buildr 1.3.5, 16 seconds with buildr 1.4.0.
>
>
>
> Many of the tests are failing (130 of 200), so I'm running with :fail_on_failure=>false. (The tests are failing because I haven't ported our custom mocking framework using aspects yet).
>
>
>
> So it appears running tests with junit might be an area to investigate further.
>
>
>
> cheers
>
> Magnus
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:23:50 -0700
> > Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> > From: alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> > To: users@buildr.apache.org
> >
> > I haven't noticed any slowdown myself but I'm not building big projects much
> > these days.
> >
> > The issue could be Buildr itself or any one of our dependencies. There were
> > many upgrades in the 1.3.5 -> 1.4.0 transition. To make this actionable,
> > you would have to identify whether it happens in a specific part of the
> > build (e.g. a specific project, a specific task like junit testing, ...) or
> > whether it's just general slowness (not tied to any specific part).
> >
> > alex
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Magnus Rundberget
> > <mr...@hotmail.com>wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr
> > > 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
> > >
> > > On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the
> > > build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
> > >
> > > Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ?
> > >
> > > kind regards
> > > Magnus
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> > > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> > >
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Posted by Magnus Rundberget <mr...@hotmail.com>.
Hi,
Thx for swift reply!
I timestamped the log output and it appears that running junit-tests in one of the subprojects is significantly slower with buildr 1.4.0.
3 seconds with buildr 1.3.5, 16 seconds with buildr 1.4.0.
Many of the tests are failing (130 of 200), so I'm running with :fail_on_failure=>false. (The tests are failing because I haven't ported our custom mocking framework using aspects yet).
So it appears running tests with junit might be an area to investigate further.
cheers
Magnus
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:23:50 -0700
> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> From: alex.boisvert@gmail.com
> To: users@buildr.apache.org
>
> I haven't noticed any slowdown myself but I'm not building big projects much
> these days.
>
> The issue could be Buildr itself or any one of our dependencies. There were
> many upgrades in the 1.3.5 -> 1.4.0 transition. To make this actionable,
> you would have to identify whether it happens in a specific part of the
> build (e.g. a specific project, a specific task like junit testing, ...) or
> whether it's just general slowness (not tied to any specific part).
>
> alex
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Magnus Rundberget
> <mr...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr
> > 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
> >
> > On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the
> > build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
> >
> > Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ?
> >
> > kind regards
> > Magnus
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> >
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Posted by Alex Boisvert <al...@gmail.com>.
I haven't noticed any slowdown myself but I'm not building big projects much
these days.
The issue could be Buildr itself or any one of our dependencies. There were
many upgrades in the 1.3.5 -> 1.4.0 transition. To make this actionable,
you would have to identify whether it happens in a specific part of the
build (e.g. a specific project, a specific task like junit testing, ...) or
whether it's just general slowness (not tied to any specific part).
alex
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:54 AM, Magnus Rundberget
<mr...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr
> 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
>
> On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the
> build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
>
> Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ?
>
> kind regards
> Magnus
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
>
RE: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Posted by Magnus Rundberget <mr...@hotmail.com>.
Hi,
Well cygwin is what our developer organization use today (with maven 1), we have loads of shellscripts and stuff so windows is not really an option and I don't think linux is going to be an option in the near future either.
I ended up with testing buildr+jruby because I wasn't very successful in getting buildr installed and working with plain ruby.
(tried with cygwins ruby package, but never managed to install buildr using gem install due to rjb version requirement I think)
cheers
Magnus
> From: antoine@lunar-ocean.com
> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 12:08:33 -0500
> Subject: Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
> To: users@buildr.apache.org
>
> I have to ask why you use cygwin and jruby.
>
> No good reason otherwise. I can say in general that jruby 1.5.1 is faster
> than 1.4.
>
> Thanks for using Buildr. We are working (well, I am envisioning) on a
> functional test framework. We will implement performance tests with it at
> some point.
>
> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 07:54, Magnus Rundberget <mr...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr
> > 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
> >
> > On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the
> > build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
> >
> > Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ?
> >
> > kind regards
> > Magnus
> >
> >
> >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> > Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> > https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
> >
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Trusted email with Microsoft’s powerful SPAM protection.
https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
Re: buildr 1.4.0 performance compared to 1.3.5
Posted by Antoine Toulme <an...@lunar-ocean.com>.
I have to ask why you use cygwin and jruby.
No good reason otherwise. I can say in general that jruby 1.5.1 is faster
than 1.4.
Thanks for using Buildr. We are working (well, I am envisioning) on a
functional test framework. We will implement performance tests with it at
some point.
On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 07:54, Magnus Rundberget <mr...@hotmail.com>wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a multiproject build that takes about 35 seconds using buildr
> 1.3.5/jruby1.4.0(or jruby 1.4.1) on cygwin.
>
> On rubyforge i found a buildr-1.4.0 bundled distribution. When I ran the
> build with that it now took about 50 seconds.
>
> Any thoughts on why buildr-1.4.0 appears to be so much slower than 1.3.5 ?
>
> kind regards
> Magnus
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Hotmail: Trusted email with powerful SPAM protection.
> https://signup.live.com/signup.aspx?id=60969
>