[jira] Commented: (OWB-448) More changes for decorator and interceptor passivation support

["Mark Struberg (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-448?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12906853#action_12906853 ] 

Mark Struberg commented on OWB-448:
-----------------------------------

please note that the abstract decorator proxy stuff is currently broken! We _must_ _not_ use ProxyFactors#setHandler(MethodHandler) and instead set the MethodHandler to each ProxyObject!

> More changes for decorator and interceptor passivation support
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: OWB-448
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OWB-448
>             Project: OpenWebBeans
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Interceptor and Decorators
>    Affects Versions: 1.0.0-alpha-2
>            Reporter: YING WANG
>            Assignee: YING WANG
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 1.0.0-alpha-3
>
>
> add some serialization/deserialization code for interceptor, decorator, and @EJB and some of their handlers. Note: due to the nature of abstract decorator and javassist (we use a proxy object to instanciate the abstract decorator class. ),  passivation of abstract decorator is not working right now since the fields in the decorator((proxy object) could not be serialzed by javassist.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.